370 likes | 470 Views
Mechanisms of Change: Relationships that Work for Adults and Children. Adapted by Ellaine B. Miller, Ph.D. From presentation by Margaret Keiley , Ed.D , LMFT Auburn University, AL. Getting to Know Each Other . Challenging Provider Issues Make me Feel Like???. What’s Your Style?.
E N D
Mechanisms of Change: Relationships that Work for Adults and Children Adapted by Ellaine B. Miller, Ph.D. From presentation by Margaret Keiley, Ed.D, LMFT Auburn University, AL
Getting to Know Each Other Challenging Provider Issues Make me Feel Like???
Theoretical Underpinnings Attachment Theory Affect Theory Change Theory
Attachment Theory What is Attachment? Why does attachment exist? • Survival mechanism • To maintain the proximity with a caregiver, especially in a stressful situation • Goal is to reduce arousal and reinstate a sense of felt security • To provide a “secure base” from which to explore What about attachment and caregivers?
Attachment Styles • SecureWarm, available, and responsive caregiver • Ambivalent-insecureInconsistent caregiver • Avoidant-insecureEmotionally unavailable or rejectingcaregiver • DisorganizedIntrusive, abusive caregiver Insecure attachment styles interfere with a person’s ability to regulate affect and to explore his/her world
Internal Working Models • Working models of the world Who attachment figures are and how one might expect them to respond • Working models of the self How acceptable or unacceptable one is in the eyes of attachment figures These internal working models of how attachment relationships operate predispose individuals to habitual forms of engagement with others, including the regulation of affect
Internal Working Models (Cont.) • Secure:Self is worthy and competent; world and others seen as safe and trustworthy • Anxious:Self is unworthy; world and others seen as undependable and rejecting • Avoidant:Self is unlovable, incompetent, never good enough; the world and others are seen as untrustworthy and never satisfied • Disorganized:No organized internal working models Last three attachment IWMs are driven by FEAR of: Rejection, Incompetence, Caregiver
Affect Theory • What is affect? Information about our experience and desire • How is affect regulated? • Affect regulation involves tolerance, awareness, expression, and control of the physiological, behavioral, and experiential aspects of affect • Affect regulation is first co-constructed as part of the attachment process in infancy We need access to the information that is contained in affect in order to make decisions about what we want & how we want get what we want. So it must be regulated.
Link between Affect & Attachment • Secure individuals are able to flexibly manage their emotions and their distance from others in conflictual interactions • Ambivalently (Anxiously) attached individuals tend to heighten distress and anger as well as pursue in conflictural interactions • Avoidantly attached individuals tend to restrict the communication of anger and distress and withdraw from conflictual interactions • Disorganized individuals have no organized attachment strategies or affect regulation strategies: Sometimes pursue and heighten distress, sometimes withdraw and restrict expression
Examples of the Links between Affect & Attachment • Secure Overtly/Hidden: express vulnerable feelings • Ambivalent Overtly: nagging, angry criticism, and pursuit Hidden: fear of rejection or sadness about disconnection • Avoidant Overtly: stonewalling, withdrawing, or flat affect Hidden: anger, hurt, sadness, and fear of incompetence • Disorganized Overtly: stonewalling, withdrawing, flat affect, pursuit, anger Hidden:terror, terror, terror
Summary MAP: Attachment Positions and Affects • Secure:Flexibility in movement toward and away from the other and tolerance of own and others’ affect (not afraid of feelings) • Ambivalent:Pursue, show distress, hide sadness and fear • Avoidant:Withdraw, show little distress, hide anger, fear, and sadness • Disorganized:No organized position, vulnerability always hidden, terrified
Physiology of Affect • The regulation of emotional arousal is the key factor in determining the nature and form of close relationships. (Porges’ Polyvagal Theory and Gray’s Motivational Theory) • Emotional arousal gets our attention. THEN • We are able to calm ourselves, attend to what is in front of us and respond appropriately. We can regulate the arousal in order to keep it in the tolerable zone (SECURE) • Or we move into a highly aroused panic mode that is not cognitively controlled. The result is we revert to a habitual mode of interaction, either fighting (rage, AMBIVALENT/ANXIOUS) or fleeing (fear, AVOIDANT)
High Arousal (Red Zone) • When you are highly aroused and in a panic mode, you CANNOT engage your brain to make decisions • You go directly into a habitual mode of response without thinking: Flight, Fight, or Freeze
Central Nervous System Autonomic Nervous System Sympathetic Nervous System Motivational Functioning Parasympathetic Nervous System Regulatory Functioning Vagal Complex: Vagus Nerve, Dorsal Motor Nucleus, Nucleus Ambiguous Reward System: Behavioral Activation System (BAS) (Dopamine System) Punishment System: Behavioral Inhibition System (BIS) (Serotonin System) Vagal Tone: Emotional Trait Vagal Reactivity or Vagal “Brake”: Emotional State
Vagal Tone (VT): Heart Rate Variability • High VT: Heart rate variability high: Easier to regulate reactivity appropriately; emotional & communication flexibility • Associated with better child, adult outcomes • Low VT: Heart rate variability low: Harder to regulate reactivity appropriately; emotional inflexibility and communication difficulties Associated with both externalizing and internalizing problems Aggression – anger, rage Depression – sadness Anxiety – fear, panic
Vagal Reactivity (VR): RSA Reactivity This vagal “brake” regulates heart rate increases and decreases to deal with environmental demands VR facilitates effective coping with challenges by allocating cognitive and motivational resources VR reflects intra-individual shifts in levels of fear and anger Moderate VR: Optimal engagement, prepare to respond Excessive VR: Emotional lability Vagal tone stabilizes by age 1, but vagal reactivity is somewhat amenable to alteration and change
Porges’ Polyvagal Theory (PNS): Regulatory Functioning Influences on the Heart: Vegetative Vagus – Deceleration of heart rate associated with orienting (older, reptilian brain) Smart Vagus – After orienting Decision Point: One of two decisions (mammalian brain) 1. Attend to and engage:Sustained attention and further deceleration of heart rate 2. Fight-Flight:Rage-Panic:Excessive acceleration of heart rate and enlist SNS
Change is Hard • Why? • What can we do about it?
Stages of Change • Precontemplation • Contemplation • Preparation/Determination • Action/Willpower • Maintenance • Relapse
Mechanisms of Change 1st order : De-escalation 2nd order : Permanent Change
Mechanism of Change • Low Arousal (First Order Change) Cognitive change – Reframe allows for awareness of initial internal working models (Emotional and Cognitive changes) Behavioral changes – De-escalation of cycles • High Arousal(Second Order Change) Repeated in-session Change of Cycles Consolidation of change of relationship cycles (out-of-session change)
Low Arousal: 1st Order Change De-Escalation of Cycles with Reframe • The trainer reframes providers’ overt feelings and behaviors to illuminate their vulnerable feelings, attachment desires and positions, and the consequences of their behaviors • The results of reframing are: Cognitive change Internal working models change (Emotional and Cognitive changes) Behavioral changes – De-escalation of cycles
High Arousal: 2nd Order Change Training Visit Interventions and Directives • The trainer directs the provider to respond in a different way. To express his/her vulnerable feelings to the other, that is to ask directly for what she or he wants Or to help him/her to hear, understand, and respond to this expression of vulnerable feelings and attachment needs This directive RAISES the AROUSAL LEVEL of the participants • Over time, the participants learn to take new positions with each other and that helps to reorganize their interactional patterns
Evoking High Arousal • Only evoke the vulnerable feelings of the provider • Fear • Sadness • Incompetence/Anger of the withdrawer • Do not evoke the overt or defensive feelings • Rage, Anger • Shame • Embarrassment
Q&A • Do we think we know what our own attachment style is? • Do we have an idea of what our providers’ attachment styles are? • Having and idea about our own and others’ styles can help us engage with others in a more positive and productive way.
Types of Providers • What are the characteristics of the providers you are involved with? • Can we create profiles?
Styles of Engagement • How do we relate to or engage in meaningful conversation with each type? • Is this a one-size fits all approach? • Do we need different approaches?
Process of Change in Training/Mentoring 1. Engagement 2. Assessment 3. 1st Order Change: Reframe 4. 2nd Order Change: Directives 5. Consolidation
Engagement Strategies Empathy Validation & Normalization Heightening Vulnerable Feelings The Use of Metaphors & Stories
Assessment What is assessed? • Attachment positions • Overt and vulnerable feelings related to positions • Interactional cycles and consequences We assess these things by tracking and reflecting the interactional cycles and the consequences
1st Order Change -- REFRAME • Address negative feelings (yours and provider’s) • Change the script • Stop the cycle
2nd order change -- DIRECTIVES • Change the cycle • Stop • Think • Respond differently • Practice, practice, practice • Needs to hold up under stress
Practicing Strategies • Applying the theories • Role play
Summary • Attachment style • Affect/vagal tone • Change is hard • Culture • Family of origin • Present situations • History • Trust