420 likes | 522 Views
The State of Television in Our Crazy World. What’s Your A/V Quality?. We’re Digital. We regained the 700MHz spectrum which we sold in 2008 to balance the Federal budget. Now our cell phone coverage is way better Everyone has those digital converter boxes for their TVs
E N D
The State of Television in Our Crazy World What’s Your A/V Quality?
We’re Digital • We regained the 700MHz spectrum • which we sold in 2008 to balance the Federal budget. • Now our cell phone coverage is way better • Everyone has those digital converter boxes for their TVs • Everything is fine, right?
Hmm, Maybe • Why doesn’t the picture fill the screen? • Why does the picture look blurry & blocky? • Sometimes I have no picture at all
What Happened? • With every change, there is a challenge • As SMPTE members, let’s see we can fix some of these problems
History – Let’s get into our WABAC1 Machine 1Wavelength Acceleration Bidirectional Asynchronous Controller
First, are we re-inventing the wheel? • Movies until the 1950s were shot in 35mm (4:3) • Movie attendance decreased in the 1950s • Introduction of wide-screen (1.67:1, 1.85:1, and 2.35:1) • Movie attendance decreased in the 2000s • Introduction of home theater
In the early 80s – most people didn’t notice • Just display it • But how? • Put borders • Anamorphic scaling • Center cut • Who cares? • It’s just an old movie after all
With Home Theaters - Film • We Care • Great picture quality • Sound fidelity • We Complain • Twitter • Facebook • Blog
What Has Happened to Viewers • People want to watch • at home • while mobile • in a theater • The experience must be great everywhere
Different Devices and Formats • How do we display the formats • Label the format at the origin so we try to get it right • We need a plan
SMPTE Working Group - 2016 - AFD • Dr Kerns Powers – Sarnoff • He cut out little squares and tried to fit all of the aspects ratios on a grid • 1.33:1 (4:3) – (35mm) • 1.67:1 (European Wide) -(16mm) • 1.85:1 (American Wide) • 2.20:1 (70mm/PanaVision) • 2.35:1 (Anamorphic Wide Screen/CinemaScope)
The Discovery • 16:9 is the geometric mean • Everything could be converted to it and from it • Most new movies are shot in CinemaScope using Center Cut so the action stays in the 1.78:1 middle
SMPTE 2016 – Specification • Active Format Description • The AFD is most commonly on line 11 in the Video Index Information (HD recommendation) • Can be on line 9 through VANC-Y (last line)
AFD Right 4:3 Source, 16:9 TV, AFD #9 16:9 Source (4:3) Protected, 4:3 TV, AFD #15 16:9 Source, 4:3 TV, AFD #10
Next Step Labeling • Benefits of labeling the aspect ratio • Save bandwidth • Compress the original aspect ratio. Play the others. • Put the station logos and graphic overlays in the right place • Display the image properly • Get the up/down conversion correct
What Does this mean • AFD Must Be • Tightly coupled with the video asset • Frame accurate • Survive work-flow processing – compression, insertion, transmission, etc. • Updated when scaling • AFD Must Not be • In the Active Video • Set your VTRs, disk recorders, and frame grabbers properly • AFD Can be • Held as meta data per frame
Where does it lead • Every pixel may not light up • Black on the top/bottom for 16:9 content shown on a 4:3 TV • Black on the sides for 4:3 content shown on a 16:9 TV • Anamorphic Scaling can fix some of this with the correct AFD settings • The user must stop fiddling with the knobs • They will continue to fiddle until the picture automatically does the right thing • Set and preserve the AFD!
System Considerations • AFD must be carried through the entire workflow • Production • Processing • Distribution • Tape decks, Capture devices must • Preserve the VANC data • Not call it active video • If the AFD is missing, • Pick a safe, repeatable behavior
After All That, Does it Work? • NO! • At home, the consumer has too many knobs to twiddle • MAYBE! • Set-top boxes (STB or IRD) are becoming AFD aware • The Head-End (HE) can set the artistic action • This is part of the consumer electronic (CE) specifications • There is HOPE!
System Considerations • Test the Behavior • Ensure devices maintain AFD • Ensure scalars change AFD correctly • Ensure scalars react properly when AFD is missing • Monitor/Test the result • Send out a known A/V sequence • Record the processed A/V sequence • Verify that the results are as expected frame-by-frame
Why Monitor? • Save Time • Prevent angry tweets, calls • Save Money • Prevent the negative press • Ensure advertisement is shown • Altruistic • Ensure quality
How Do We Monitor • Employ students to watch • After a while they look like this • Then they make mistakes
Why Automated Monitoring? • Saves Time • Finds errors that you may have missed • Logs errors for further analysis • Saves Money • The employee can do something more valuable
Problems seen while Monitoring • Up/Down scaling problems • Loss of A/V quality • Loss of A/V sync • Encoding, transmitting, decoding problems • Loss of ancillary, PSIP Data
Types of Broadcast Monitoring • Full Reference • No Reference • Reduced Reference
Full Reference Monitoring • Compares Reference and Processed A/V streams • Identifies all errors • Problem • Both streams must be co-located • Must be temporally and spatially aligned • Usage • Best in a lab or controlled environment
No Reference • Evaluates the processed sequence • Identifies • Blocking, contouring, blurring • Loss of high frequency • Quantization noise • Packet loss • Problem • Wrongly identifies “Artistic Content” • Usage • Used when the reference is not present • No need for synchronization
What is Artistic Content? • Does anyone remember Jay Leno doing this?
Reduced Reference • Compares some extracted information from the reference and processed • Identifies most errors • Problem • Extracted information must be co-located • Extracted information must be aligned • Usage • Best when a back-channel is present and when full reference cannot be used
What is SMPTE up to? • Working Group 22TV • In-service monitoring • Lip-Sync detection • Audio quality • Video quality • Based on finger printing technology • Reduced Reference
What is Finger Printing • Extract information from the audio and video separately • Resilient to data processing/ compression • Independent of resolution, frame rate, sampling • Independent of logo insertion, graphic overlay, etc. • Computed at the reference point when the data is known to be correct • Compared at the processing point
What is Finger Printing (continued) • Standards-based algorithm which everyone can use • Reduced Reference • Requires us to go back and finger print old movies and shows
What Finger Printing is NOT! • Watermarking • This is carried within the audio/video and can be destroyed by compression • Proprietary approach • All vendors must work together with broadcasters • A short-term fix • We must go back and finger print old movies
Hope • In-service dynamic monitoring • Check A/V quality • Check A/V offset (lip-sync) • Alert on errors • Errors not identified • AFD correct – or any other control variables • It does check if the picture has been scaled though
It Should See this Error • Can you see the error – yes I am playing it slow?
How about if I just show you this • Frames 1-4
Conclusion • You may not fill the entire screen • Live with it • Monitor everything to make sure it works • Find and fix problems before your customers LEAVE • SMPTE is working and with your help it can do more
What Does Video Clarity Do? • Full Reference Monitoring • We find all errors • Save sequences around every error • A/V Quality Analysis • Quantitative measurements • Perceptual measurement • View and hear