320 likes | 556 Views
Astronomy 535 Stellar Structure Evolution. Course Philosophy. “Crush them, crush them all!” -Professor John Feldmeier. Course Philosophy. Contextual stellar evolution What we see stars doing The stellar structure that makes stars look that way
E N D
Course Philosophy “Crush them, crush them all!” -Professor John Feldmeier
Course Philosophy Contextual stellar evolution • What we see stars doing • The stellar structure that makes stars look that way • The physical processes determining the stellar structure • How stars change with time • The impact of stars upon their environment
Motivation for studying stellar evolution • Stars as ensembles • Clusters • Stellar populations • Starbursts • Stellar yields and environment • Luminosity: Interstellar radiation field, heating, photoionization • Kinetic Energy: Stellar winds, supernovae, feedback • Nucleosynthesis: Chemical evolution • Evolution of ISM, IGM, gas fraction, composition, star formation, populations, galaxies, baryonic matter in general profoundly depends on stellar evolution My god,it’s full of stars
Motivation for studying stellar evolution • Stars as ensembles • Clusters • Stellar populations • Starbursts • Stellar yields and environment • Luminosity: Interstellar radiation field, heating, photoionization • Kinetic Energy: Stellar winds, supernovae, feedback • Nucleosynthesis: Chemical evolution • Evolution of ISM, IGM, gas fraction, composition, star formation, populations, galaxies, baryonic matter in general profoundly depends on stellar evolution
Motivation for studying stellar evolution • Stars as ensembles • Clusters • Stellar populations • Starbursts • Stellar yields and environment • Luminosity: Interstellar radiation field, heating, photoionization • Kinetic Energy: Stellar winds, supernovae, feedback • Nucleosynthesis: Chemical evolution • Evolution of ISM, IGM, gas fraction, composition, star formation, populations, galaxies, baryonic matter in general profoundly depends on stellar evolution
Motivation for studying stellar evolution • Stars as ensembles • Clusters • Stellar populations • Starbursts • Stellar yields and environment • Luminosity: Interstellar radiation field, heating, photoionization • Kinetic Energy: Stellar winds, supernovae, feedback • Nucleosynthesis: Chemical evolution • Evolution of ISM, IGM, gas fraction, composition, star formation, populations, galaxies, baryonic matter in general profoundly depends on stellar evolution
Motivation for studying stellar evolution • Stars as ensembles • Clusters • Stellar populations • Starbursts • Stellar yields and environment • Luminosity: Interstellar radiation field, heating, photoionization • Kinetic Energy: Stellar winds, supernovae, feedback • Nucleosynthesis: Chemical evolution • Evolution of ISM, IGM, gas fraction, composition, star formation, populations, galaxies, baryonic matter in general profoundly depends on stellar evolution
Motivation for studying stellar evolution • Stars as ensembles • Clusters • Stellar populations • Starbursts • Stellar yields and environment • Luminosity: Interstellar radiation field, heating, photoionization • Kinetic Energy: Stellar winds, supernovae, feedback • Nucleosynthesis: Chemical evolution • Evolution of ISM, IGM, gas fraction, composition, star formation, populations, galaxies, baryonic matter in general profoundly depends on stellar evolution
Motivation for studying stellar evolution • Stars as ensembles • Clusters • Stellar populations • Starbursts • Stellar yields and environment • Luminosity: Interstellar radiation field, heating, photoionization • Kinetic Energy: Stellar winds, supernovae, feedback • Nucleosynthesis: Chemical evolution • Evolution of ISM, IGM, gas fraction, composition, star formation, populations, galaxies, baryonic matter in general profoundly depends on stellar evolution
Motivation for studying stellar evolution • Stars as ensembles • Clusters • Stellar populations • Starbursts • Stellar yields and environment • Luminosity: Interstellar radiation field, heating, photoionization • Kinetic Energy: Stellar winds, supernovae, feedback • Nucleosynthesis: Chemical evolution • Evolution of ISM, IGM, gas fraction, composition, star formation, populations, galaxies, baryonic matter in general profoundly depends on stellar evolution
Motivation for studying stellar evolution • Evolution of ISM, IGM, gas fraction, composition, star formation, populations, galaxies, baryonic matter in general profoundly depends on stellar evolution • Fits of models to observations by means of free parameters is standard procedure, but gives unreliable or downright bad results for most applications • Must be able to predict evolution of a star as a function of mass and composition to high accuracy • Also necessary to understand individual objects
Quantitative Uncertainties in Yields for Massive Stars • Luminosity: • factors of 2 by 25 M • Larger radii, lower Teff, fewer ionizing photons • IMFs derived from observed luminosity functions • Kinetic energy • Order of magnitude uncertainties in mass loss rates • complete uncertainty in composition of winds for a given star • Nucleosynthetic • 2 orders of magnitude in Fe peak abundances from progenitors, reaction calculations, supernova explosion calculations, etc.
How to study stars • Too many stellar models are black boxes - tuning a free parameter (i.e. overshooting) to fit one particular observation allows you to predict nothing about other stars
How to study stars • Too many stellar models are black boxes - tuning a free parameter (i.e. overshooting) to fit one particular observation allows you to predict nothing about other stars • Stars are not black boxes - including complete physics in a stellar model should give you a correct model
How to study stars • Too many stellar models are black boxes - tuning a free parameter (i.e. overshooting) to fit one particular observation allows you to predict nothing about other stars • Stars are not black boxes - including complete physics in a stellar model should give you a correct model • Stars are plasma physics problems - must account for B fields, ionization, multi-component EOS, & charge effects on reactions, radiation transport, hydrostatics, & dynamics
How to study stars • 3-pronged approach • Theory based on analytical work and simulations • Terrestrial High Energy Density experiments with lasers and other facilities approximate stellar conditions • Observational tests of theoretical models identify deficiencies in physics, not fits to free parameters
How to study stars • 3-pronged approach • Theory based on analytical work and simulations • Terrestrial High Energy Density experiments with lasers and other facilities approximate stellar conditions • Observational tests of theoretical models identify deficiencies in physics, not fits to free parameters
How to study stars • 3-pronged approach • Theory based on analytical work and simulations • Terrestrial High Energy Density experiments with lasers and other facilities approximate stellar conditions • Observational tests of theoretical models identify deficiencies in physics, not fits to free parameters
Syllabus 1/11 Intro to class Motivation for studying stars Syllabus Timescales 1/13 Equations of hydrodynamics Sound waves Hydrostatic equilibrium Mass-Luminosity relations 1/16 MLK Holiday 1/18 Convection Waves 1/20 Waves Rotation 1/23 **Patrick Leaves for Santa Barbara** EOS Opacities Abundances
Syllabus 1/25 Nuclear reactions TYCHO 1/27 The HR diagram CMDs High mass vs. low mass Introduce project 1 (MS as f(z)) 1/30 Pre-MS 2/1 Low mass objects Main sequence starts HW: burning timescales 2/3 pp vs. CNO Convection pp vs. CNO all the problems thereof 2/6 Probably more convection Rotation
Syllabus 2/8 Mass-Luminosity relation & lifetimes Cluster ages Composition effects Fun opacity sources 2/10 Misc & catch-up 2/13 **Patrick returns from Santa Barbara** Presentations 2/15 Presentations 2/17 Presentations 2/20 Mass loss Very massive stars Pop III
Syllabus 2/22 Post-MS H exhaustion Shell burning RGB 2/24 3alpha degeneracy Tip of RGB He flash 2/27 Red clump/BHB Stellar pulsations Cepheids kappa mechanism
Syllabus 3/1 Double shell burning AGB Ratio of BHB/AGB 3/3 C stars, extreme pop II Thermal pulse s-process 3/6 Mass loss PN ejection White dwarfs 3/8 Massive stars Mass loss Wolf Rayets Kinetic luminosity & feedback 3/10 3/13 - 3/17 Spring Break
Syllabus 3/20 Presentations 3/22 Presentations 3/24 Presentations 3/27 Misc. & catch-up 3/29 C ignition neutrino cooling C burning 3/31 Ne burning O burning weak interactions
Syllabus 4/3 Dynamics of the shell URCA Flame fronts & wierd burning 4/5 detailed balance & thermodynamic consistency QSE NSE Si burning 4/7 Core collapse Nuclear reactions 4/10 Neutrinos Mechanisms 4/12 Asymmetries Mixing Explosive nucleosynthesis 4/14 alpha-rich freezeout r-process uncertainties in nucleo
Syllabus 4/17 Core collapse types Spectra Lightcurves 87A 4/19 Type 1a Pair instability GRBs 4/21 GRBs compact objects CVs & XRBs 4/24 **Patrick leaves for Nepal** Population synthesis Stellar pops (Christy?)
Syllabus 4/26 Misc. & catch-up 4/28 Presentations 5/1 Presentations 5/3 Presentations
Timescales Gravitational timescale Hydrodynamic timescale Note that in hydrostatic equilibrium Hydrostatic adjustment timescale at 1M White Dwarf: few s Main sequence: 27 min (sun) Red Giant: 18 days For most phases HSE << evol
Timescales Kelvin-Helmholtz (Thermal) For sun KH ~ 10 Myr
Timescales Nuclear or Evolutionary Timescale Quick ‘n’ dirty solar lifetime estimate QHHe=6.3x1018erg g-1(0.7% of rest mass energy) assume 10% of H gets burned Enuc = 2x1033g x 0.1 x 0.007 x c2 = 1.26x1051 erg L = 4x1033 erg 3x1017 s = 10 Gyr