120 likes | 279 Views
Day 2. Progress so far with workshop objectives. Objective 1: Reviewed progress of implementation of ESD since the Geelong conference (DONE) Objective 2: Reviewed outcomes of ESD subprogramme and determined what gaps remain for ESD implementation at the individual fishery level (DONE).
E N D
Progress so far with workshop objectives • Objective 1: Reviewed progress of implementation of ESD since the Geelong conference (DONE) • Objective 2: Reviewed outcomes of ESD subprogramme and determined what gaps remain for ESD implementation at the individual fishery level (DONE)
Objective 1: Review progress of implementation of ESD since the Geelong conference Overall: • Generally thought significant progress with implementation of ESD since Geelong • Implementation not consistent across jurisdictions • Lack of understanding/acknowledgement by community of this progress • One legged ESD stool • Valuable tools, including risk-based frameworks now available, not widely used yet
Objective 1: Reviewed progress of implementation of ESD since the Geelong conference – outcome of subprogramme Following themes taken from yesterday’s table • Target species relatively well covered; tools developed and used; some risk based approaches. Now core business. • Non-target/bycatch/by-product species; as above, but more difficult to demonstrate adequate performance. • Ecosystem still requires considerable development but this may be best done at a regional level not individual fishery.
Objective 1: Reviewed progress of implementation of ESD since the Geelong conference – outcome of subprogramme • Economic considerations not widely used– needed to inform management decision making in an ESD framework. Tools available, but almost no uptake. • Social considerations as above, or worse – little policy framework/acceptance of value – what to measure and to what end. • Integration – introduced late in programme, but before its time? • Education and extension – effort expended, but more to be done (wider community/industry/markets
Objective 3 Determine if a national programme is required to assist development of initiatives for fisheries and marine management at a regional scale or, Implementing EBFM
Order of Play - 3 working groups • 6 groups made by mating tables, maintained through all three sessions. • Appoint a facilitator and rapporteur • Start writing early – 10 and 5 minute bells will be tolled • Present succinctly – time will be of the essence • Don’t repeat previous speakers’ comments
Question 1 • Each table has a number of copies of a table summarising the presentations made in the PM yesterday. The aim of the table is to draw together the themes that need to be tackled under EBFM. • Your first task, should you choose to accept it (no choice) will be to fill in missing or duplicated issues. • Want to end up with 10 priority issues to focus the next 2 WG sessions, which focus on filling in the rest of the table.
OVERACHING DRIVERS • MEETING ?? (UNDERSTAND) COMMUNITY EXPECTATIONS e.g. Increasing understanding by community 2. LACK OF EFFECTIVE RESPONSE FRAMEWORK e.g. Harmonisation 3. COMMUNICATION e.g. Aligning Information 4. VIABLE RESILIANT SECTORS 5. EXTERNAL FACTOR Gap - Formal review of ESD Subprogram
DRIVERS FOR ESD/EBFM BASED FISHERIES MANAGEMENT • MEETING/ UNDERSTSTANDING FUTURE COMMUNITY/MARKET EXPECTATIONS/POLICIES • HAVING AN EFFECTIVE GOVERNANCE/RESPONSE FRAMEWORK • VIABLE (ADAPTIVE/RESILIENT SECTORS (ECONOMIC/SOCIAL VIABILTY/DEVELOPMENT) that meet COMMUNITY/MARKET EXPECTATIONS/ POLICIES • EXTERNAL FACTORS
POSSIBLE ROLES FOR A NATIONAL EBFM INITIATIVE?? • MEETING/ UNDERSTSTANDING FUTURE COMMUNITY/MARKET EXPECTATIONS/POLICIES • HAVING AN EFFECTIVE GOVERNANCE/RESPONSE FRAMEWORK • VIABLE (ADAPTIVE/RESILIENT SECTORS (ECONOMIC/SOCIAL VIABILTY/DEVELOPMENT) that meet COMMUNITY/MARKET EXPECTATIONS/ POLICIES • EXTERNAL FACTORS