1 / 19

WAIAHOLE DITCH CASE STUDY

WAIAHOLE DITCH CASE STUDY. SITUATION. Commercial sugarcane production was established in leeward O'ahu in 1896.

dmitri
Download Presentation

WAIAHOLE DITCH CASE STUDY

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WAIAHOLE DITCH CASE STUDY

  2. SITUATION Commercial sugarcane production was established in leeward O'ahu in 1896. In 1912 the Waiahole Water Company was formed to construct a ditch and tunnel system to divert stream and ground water from windward areas (Waiahole to Kahana) to the leeward sugar lands.

  3. Star-Bulletin April 25, 1997

  4. The total system is 40 km long, with almost 15 km of tunnels and an average flow rate of 100 mld. The flow of windward streams was reportedly reduced by about 40 %. With the closing of O'ahu Sugar Company in early 1995, a struggle for the use of this water has pitted windward farmers and residents against leeward farmers, land owners and developers.

  5. CONTRASTING VIEWPOINTS A Honolulu Advertiser article on October 6, 1996 (pp.B1&B4) offers the contrasting viewpoints of : Alan Oshima (attorney for the Waiahole Irrigation Company, an Amfac subsidiary) and Vivien Lee (Waiahole resident)

  6. Leeward arguments: • Gravity flow water is cheaper • Ditch water needed to recharge aquifer • Leeward agriculture will improve state economy • High sunlight, productive conditions Windward arguments: • Restore streams and bay ecosystems • Rejuvenate taro production (& Hawaiian culture) • Reduce “development of Leeward areas • Encourage water reuse in Ewa

  7. Star-Bulletin -- April 25, 1997 ROUGH WATER AHEAD A coming decision has major implications for water allocation -- By Pat Omandam Star-Bulletin Five years ago, Zeune Baccam decided growing cucumbers, string beans, soy, tomatoes, green onions and eggplants for a living was far less demanding than his previous job raising money for the local Boy Scouts. Today, Baccam, who immigrated from Laos to Hawaii in 1975, runs a successful cooperative of 30 small vegetable farms in Mililani. But he said the stress has returned for all those whose livelihoods depend on irrigation water from Waiahole Ditch. "Without the water, we're finished," he said. "There's no other sources." Kunia farmer Larry Jefts, whose watermelons and bell peppers grow plump with Waiahole water, speculates it would be the end of farming on the Leeward plain if the ditch ran dry. "That's not a hard call," Jefts said. "No water, and we're not here.” ...

  8. Star-Bulletin Editorials Friday, December 26, 1997 Sensible compromise on Waiahole Ditch DIVIDING the 27 million gallons of water that flowed daily through the Waiahole Ditch to irrigate Leeward cane fields was a task that could have taxed the wisdom of Solomon. The decision by the state Water Commission strikes a balance between the needs of Windward and Leeward Oahu -- one that appears to give appropriate consideration to both. The commission's final decision allots 11.39 million gallons to Windward Oahu, almost twice the amount of its earlier proposal. However, of that amount only 6 million gallons is guaranteed to remain on the Windward side of the Koolaus. The other 5.39 million gallons would remain in Windward streams for the present but could be diverted to Leeward Oahu in the future. An agricultural reserve of 1.58 million gallons, designated for Leeward agriculture, would also remain on the Windward side for now. Leeward Oahu is awarded direct access to 15.61 million gallons, with the prospect of considerably more as needed. Windward advocates denounced the decision, calling it politically motivated -- a charge that could have been expected because they had proposed that all the Waiahole water remain on the Windward side. Their argument has been that the water is needed to replenish streams that formerly nourished taro beds before the construction of the ditch 81 years ago, and otherwise restore the environment. However, even the minimum guaranteed allotment of six million gallons represents a historic shift of resources back to the Windward side. And for the present at least, considerably more water would remain on the Windward side. ...

  9. Star-Bulletin Wednesday, February 11, 1998 LEGISLATURE UPDATE Waiahole Ditch purchase moves forward in Senate But some folks claim the state purchase will benefit landowners, not farmers By Pat Omandam Waiahole farmer John Reppun has a lot of respect for Mililani farmers who depend on irrigation Waiahole Ditch for their livelihoods. Reppun, however, doesn't believe the state should pay $10.2 million to buy the ditch system, because the state, by law, has sole control to regulate the 27 million gallons of water that flow through it each day. The committees on Economic Development, and on Water, Land and Hawaiian Affairs, forwarded a Senate bill that authorizes the state to spend $10.2 million in reimbursable general obligation bonds to buy the Waiahole system. It would take about 20 years to pay off the bonds. ... Expenses to the state Purchase price of the ditch: $10.2 million Estimated annual operating cost: $550,000 Cost of needed repairs: $1.2 million

  10. Watersheds of Kaneohe Bay

  11. Control gate at north portal of tunnel(Star-Bulletin, April 5, 1997)

  12. Flume in Uwao tunnel Typical section of ditch Gauge near Mililani Redwood stave siphon

  13. Reppun taro field in Waiahole

  14. Waiahole farmer, Sisuke Serikaku (Star-Bulletin July 12, 1998)

  15. RESOLUTION(?) This case came before the Hawaii Water Commission in 1996. The Commission’s decision was to split the water flow so that allocation is as follows: • 40 mld (maximum) to Leeward agriculture • 4 mld to non-agricultural Leeward uses • 6 mld to “future agriculture” (Leeward or Windward) • 50 mld to Waiahole stream

  16. The remainder and any Leeward allocations not actually used, revert to the Windward side. This decision is being appealed by several parties. In 1999 the State purchased the ditch for $8.5 million -- users will be charged 35 cents per 4000 liters.

  17. Small group discussion. Assume 50% of ditch flow is restored to Windward Streams. • Divide into groups of 3 – 4 students to discuss: • Economic/Social/Policy Issues: • costs/benefits of reducing ditch flow to Windward or Leeward communities, • potential for agriculture development – both Windward and Leeward, • what is the “community interest”? • Develop a research question • Outline a research project to study this question • Report back to the whole class

More Related