1 / 13

WB CCS Conference - Sandton

WB CCS Conference - Sandton. Tim I. B. Lund Royal Norwegian Embassy - Pretoria. Two perspectives. The view from Norway The view from SACCSC. Norwegian CCS policy. Ambitious goals for broad deployment of CCS; All new gas fired power plants with CCS;

don
Download Presentation

WB CCS Conference - Sandton

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WB CCS Conference - Sandton Tim I. B. LundRoyal Norwegian Embassy - Pretoria

  2. Two perspectives • The view from Norway • The view from SACCSC

  3. Norwegian CCS policy • Ambitious goals for broad deployment of CCS; • All new gas fired power plants with CCS; • Facilitates R&D on CCS, cooperates closely with industrial actors and provides public funding; • Public CCS spending 2009+2010: 800 million USD; • International CCS activities (but small compared to Renewables support)

  4. Storage • The Sleipner field (North Sea): 1 million tons/CO2stored annually since 1996 (due to CO2 tax); • The SnøhvitField: 700.000 tons/CO2 stored annually (Barents Sea); • In Salah (with Statoil).

  5. Capture • Technology Centre Mongstad (TCM) to develop, test and qualify CCS technologies; • World’s largest demo plant of this kind; • Partners so far: The Norwegian State (Gassnova), Statoil, Shell and Sasol; • Two sources of flue gas and two technologies being tested: Amine and Chilled Ammonia technologies + others? • Capture capacity: 100,000 tons CO2; • Start-up 2011/2012; • To be followed by large scale capture plant; • Final decision in 2016.

  6. Strong CCS cluster • Oil and Gas companies; • Universities; • Research institutions; • Consultants and third party service providers; Many learning and cooperation opportunities.

  7. SACCSC Persepctive After 2,5 years: • CCS firmly on the agenda in SA (DoE but also other departments); • Key projects under way; • Capacity building needed at all levels; • Public engagement not started. Must be done early and right. But: • Regional work important (ref. energy system). Key role for WB. • Geology (no storage – no project); • Regulatory and institutional; • Cross border issues; • Financing;

  8. SACCSC Persepctive, Cont. • SACCSC is the CCS competence Centre in SA: • Use the SACCSC network, competence and systems to support key SA priorities; • Create synergies regionally and South-South; • Avoid duplication of efforts. • SACCSC seeks to leverage international financial support: • Avoid duplication of efforts; • Financing needs will increase as we move from studies to testing.

  9. Conclusion • WB involvement in CCS in SA and the region very welcome; • We look forward to the results of WB work. Thank you tim.lund@mfa.no

  10. Key messages DG Magubane: • IRP confirms CCS role in SA Energy system and CC ambitions; • SANEDI now listed as a new company – Key role on CCS • 2011 DoE strategic plan: CCS Regulatory framework • DoE-WB list of activities presently being discussed (?) • 2nd CCS Week in October 2011. CCS will figure prominently at COP17 in Durban (Energy pavillion?) WB, Ruth Kagia: • Bold CC promise in Copenhagen based on LTMS; • Issue is not Why but How. • 15% of electricity for light; • WB, Natalia K: • WB Energy financing BUSD 13 last year • CSP increasingly important for WB; • CCS Regional study: • Legal and institutional framework • Techno-economic ass. Of CCS in Power system • Climate finance • Finance of CCS project

  11. Key messages, Cont. SAPP, Musara Beta: • Hydro in North; Thermal in South. Demand in South (SA). SAPP est. in 1995; • SAPP: 74,3% Coal. 20,1% Hydro (SA is 82,5% of installed capacity). • New Plans, 2025: 42% Coal, 32% Hydro, 22% Diesel (excl. Grand Inga). • EE: 2010, 750MW (target was 1400MW); • Cannot evacuate power from North to the South (bottleneck); • Coal: 74%56%; Hydro: 20%26; Wind&Solar:0%0,5% (needs power-pooling and interconnectors) • SAPP pt focuses on RE; SA is looking at biomass for coal fired power stations. EA, Sean McCoy: CCS Technology Road Map (2009) • pt not on target – non OECD countries must be involved (2020, need 50-50); • CCS not just clean coal: Synfuel (Coal fired power 40%); • 5 trillion USD needed 2010-2050! (125 BUSD/year). 11% of Blue map incremental investment. • Sleipner, Snøhvit, In Salah, Rangely, Weyburn • 50% of planned projects are EOR;

  12. Key messages, Cont. GCCSI, Alice Gibson: • Asset lifecycle model; • Slides on status of CCS projects globally: • Cost estimates are now 20-30% higher than 2-3 years ago; • Public engagement is key! DECC: James Godber • CEM, Abu Dhabi-April 2011 COP17; SACCSC, BB • SA needs tech and fin support (COP15); • “We want a complete and legally binding agreement” • 2016 Test injection (10,000t) • SA #13 in CO2 globally; Synfuel (SASOL / PetroSA app. 30 mt CO2/yr); Eskom, B.McColl

  13. Key messages, Cont. • Regional aspects key (ref. SAPP, RERA, etc.); • Leverage internal (+ int. funds) for int. cooperation. Need money and decide on its use! • Public engagement. Key in SA. • Norway RE support 10x that of CCS (2011 1,600 MNOK?) • Zuma signing: Sasol, Eskom, SANBI or DEA, SARI

More Related