1 / 28

Estonian unions and current crisis

Estonian unions and current crisis. Harri Taliga May 29, 200 9. Unions 2009. Union density rate – below 10% , declining 1,5 (?) confederations: EAKL Confederation of Estonian Trade Unions re-established in April 1990 (first TUC in 1919)

donald
Download Presentation

Estonian unions and current crisis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Estonian unions and current crisis Harri Taliga May 29, 2009

  2. Unions 2009 • Union density rate – below10%, declining • 1,5 (?) confederations: • EAKL Confederation of Estonian Trade Unions re-established in April 1990 (first TUC in 1919) • TALO (Estonian Employees’ Unions’ Confederation) – split from EAKL in 1993-1994 • February 2009 – Teachers and univeristy teachers unions left TALO

  3. EAKL EAKL has 19 affiliates in: industry transport private services health care state and local authorities

  4. EAKL (2) • Central office – 11 employees • 6 regional offices – 7 employees Central office: • President • Secretaries: organising, legal issues, wages/negotiations, international • PR-manager • lawyer

  5. Social dialogue • 1992 April – first tripartite agreement • 1992-2003 – 17 tripartite agreements • Minimum wage • State unemployment allowance • Basic income tax exemption • Participatory democracy • Guarantee fund • Principles of new Employment Contract Act

  6. Social dialogue (2) • Spring 2008 – tough tripartite negotiations on new Employment Contract Act • April 23, 2008 – delegations signed agreement on the Bill • amendments only on tripartite approval • enforcement one year after adoption • Government broke its word

  7. Bipartite negotiations • Unions – employers • National: confederations • Branch: sectoral federations/associations • Company: union and employer • Unions – government • Civil servants’ salaries • Teachers’ salaries

  8. EAKL – Employers’ Confederation • December 1999 – memorandum • February 2001 – unemployment insurance • March 2001 – social partnership • August 2001 – principles of increasing minimum wage for 2002-2008 • September 2003 – principles of new Labour Contract Act • Agreements on minimum wage (2002 – 2008)

  9. Collective agreements 2008 • Total coverage – 28% • 1 national agreement • 2 sectoral/branch agreements • public transport • health care • Energy, railway, mining covered by company agreements

  10. Unions’ achievments • Protection of unions’ rights in Employees Representatives Act (12. 2006) • National minimum wage agreements • 2007: increase by 20% – 3600 EEK • 2008: increase by 20,8% – 4350 EEK • 2009: no increase - 4350 EEK • ESF money for social partners’ capacity building (2008 – 2014)

  11. Priorities for unions • Organising and recruiting members • Increasing representativity • Increasing bargaining capacity • Increasing ability to take industrial actions • 2004 – 2007 EAKL and affiliates organised 14-16 strikes, demonstartions, picket lines every year • 2008 – warning strike of EMSA

  12. Priorities for unions (2) • Promote European social model • strong industrial relations – partnership and workers’ participation • higher labour and social standards • social inclusion • fight against any discrimination

  13. Challenges for Estonian unions • Reluctance of the state to engage in social dialogue • no real interest in social partners’ involvement • attempts to limit (by amendments to legal acts) the unions’ influence and to push unions out from the dialogue

  14. GDP growth • 2000–2007: 8,7% p.a. in average • 2008: –3,6% (preliminary) • 2009: –8,5% (MoF) vs –12,3% (BoE) • 2010: –2,5% (MoF) vs 0,2% (BoE)

  15. Increasing unemployment • 2000–2007: 9,3% p.a. in average • 2008: 5,5% • 2009: 12,2% • 2010: 15,6%

  16. Inflation • CPI • 2000–2007: 4,1% p.a. in average • 2008: 10,6% • 2009: 0,7% • 2010: – 0,6%

  17. Wages • Nominal wages • 2000–2007: 12,5% p.a. in average • 2008: 14,4% • 2009: – 4,4% • 2010: – 2,3% • Minimum wage • 2000–2007: 14,2% p.a. in average • 2008: 20,8% • 2009: 0,0%

  18. Policy of the Government • Autumn 2008: unrealistic 2009 budget bill – adopted in December • GDP increase +2,6% • Spending 98,5 billion kroons (deficit –0,8%) • February 2009: • Public spending cuts – 6,6 billion kroons • Join Euro in mid-2010

  19. Policy of the Government (2) • April 2009: • Additional cuts – 8,5 billion kroons • Enforcment of the new Employment Contract Act, but without of agreed increase of the unemployment insurance benefits • Euro is not the goal, but additional benefit

  20. Income tax changes

  21. Unions response • Cuts are not creating economic growth • Support of the domestic demand needed • Redistribution of the income tax: • basic exemption up to 5000 EEK/month • income tax rate up to 26% • Joining Euro at any costs not acceptable

  22. Unions response (2) • Social insurance reserves to be used according to their purpose • Enforcement of the Employment Contract Act • only on agreed in spring 2008 conditions • alternative – new agreement

  23. Thank you for your attention! www.eakl.ee

More Related