1 / 19

Pertemuan 11 Analisis Varians Data Nonparametrik

Pertemuan 11 Analisis Varians Data Nonparametrik. Matakuliah : A0392 – Statistik Ekonomi Tahun : 2006. Outline Materi : Uji Kruskal Wallis Pembuatan peringkat data Statistik uji Kruskal Wallis. Analysis of Variance:Data Nonparametric. (continued).

donar
Download Presentation

Pertemuan 11 Analisis Varians Data Nonparametrik

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Pertemuan 11Analisis Varians Data Nonparametrik Matakuliah : A0392 – Statistik Ekonomi Tahun : 2006

  2. Outline Materi : • Uji Kruskal Wallis • Pembuatan peringkat data • Statistik uji Kruskal Wallis

  3. Analysis of Variance:Data Nonparametric (continued) • Kruskal-Wallis Rank Test for Differences in c Medians • Friedman Rank Test for Differences in c Medians

  4. Kruskal-Wallis Rank Test • Assumptions • Independent random samples are drawn • Continuous dependent variable • Data may be ranked both within and among samples • Populations have same variability • Populations have same shape • Robust with Regard to Last 2 Conditions • Use F test in completely randomized designs and when the more stringent assumptions hold

  5. Kruskal-Wallis Rank Test Procedure • Obtain Ranks • In event of tie, each of the tied values gets their average rank • Add the Ranks for Data from Each of the c Groups • Square to obtain Tj2

  6. Kruskal-Wallis Rank Test Procedure (continued) • Compute Test Statistic • # of observation in j –th sample • H may be approximated by chi-square distribution with df = c –1 when each nj >5

  7. Kruskal-Wallis Rank Test Procedure (continued) • Critical Value for a Given a • Upper tail • Decision Rule • Reject H0: M1 = M2 = ••• = Mc if test statistic H > • Otherwise, do not reject H0

  8. As production manager, you want to see if 3 filling machines have different median filling times. You assign 15 similarly trained & experienced workers, 5 per machine, to the machines. At the .05 significance level, is there a difference in median filling times? Kruskal-Wallis Rank Test: Example Machine1Machine2Machine3 25.40 23.40 20.00 26.31 21.80 22.20 24.10 23.50 19.75 23.74 22.75 20.60 25.10 21.60 20.40

  9. Example Solution: Step 1 Obtaining a Ranking Raw Data Ranks Machine1Machine2Machine3 25.40 23.40 20.00 26.31 21.80 22.20 24.10 23.50 19.75 23.74 22.75 20.60 25.10 21.60 20.40 Machine1Machine2Machine3 14 9 2 15 6 7 12 10 1 11 8 4 13 5 3 65 38 17

  10. Example Solution: Step 2 Test Statistic Computation

  11. H0: M1 = M2 = M3 H1: Not all equal  = .05 df = c - 1 = 3 - 1 = 2 Critical Value(s): Kruskal-Wallis Test Example Solution Test Statistic: H = 11.58 Decision:  = .05. Reject at Conclusion:  = .05 There is evidence that population medians are not all equal.

  12. Kruskal-Wallis Test in PHStat • PHStat | c-Sample Tests | Kruskal-Wallis Rank Sum Test … • Example Solution in Excel Spreadsheet

  13. Friedman Rank Test for Differences in c Medians • Tests the equality of more than 2 (c) population medians • Distribution-Free Test Procedure • Used to Analyze Randomized Block Experimental Designs • Use 2 Distribution to Approximate if the Number of Blocks r > 5 • df = c – 1

  14. Friedman Rank Test • Assumptions • The r blocks are independent • The random variable is continuous • The data constitute at least an ordinal scale of measurement • No interaction between the r blocks and the c treatment levels • The c populations have the same variability • The c populations have the same shape

  15. Friedman Rank Test:Procedure • Replace the c observations by their ranks in each of the r blocks; assign average rank for ties • Test statistic: • R.j2 is the square of the rank total for group j • FR can be approximated by a chi-square distribution with (c–1) degrees of freedom • The rejection region is in the right tail

  16. As production manager, you want to see if 3 filling machines have different median filling times. You assign 15 workers with varied experience into 5 groups of 3 based on similarity of their experience, and assigned each group of 3 workers with similar experience to the machines. At the .05 significance level, is there a difference in median filling times? Friedman Rank Test: Example Machine1Machine2Machine3 25.40 23.40 20.00 26.31 21.80 22.20 24.10 23.50 19.75 23.74 22.75 20.60 25.10 21.60 20.40

  17. Friedman Rank Test: Computation Table

  18. H0: M1 = M2 = M3 H1: Not all equal  = .05 df = c - 1 = 3 - 1 = 2 Critical Value: Friedman Rank Test Example Solution Test Statistic: FR= 8.4 Decision:  = .05 Reject at Conclusion:  = .05 There is evidence that population medians are not all equal.

  19. Chapter Summary (continued) • Discussed Kruskal-Wallis Rank Test for Differences in c Medians • Illustrated Friedman Rank Test for Differences in c Medians

More Related