1 / 13

5  20 Years . . .

6.3. 6.2. 6.1. “Discovery to Deployment” (S&T must address near-term objectives & long-term challenges). How we work:. 5  20 Years. 5 Years. Present. Navy and Marine Corps After Next. The Next Navy and Marine Corps. Today’s Navy and Marine Corps. Requirements-Driven FNCs

donitar
Download Presentation

5  20 Years . . .

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 6.3 6.2 6.1 “Discovery to Deployment” (S&T must address near-term objectives & long-term challenges) How we work: 5  20 Years . . . 5 Years . . . Present . . . Navy and Marine Corps After Next The Next Navy and Marine Corps Today’s Navy and Marine Corps • Requirements-Driven FNCs • Transformational Technologies • Fleet/Force Experimentation • Naval Research Enterprise • Technology Solutions • NR-Stat • Swampworks • Idea Exploration • Naval Unique / Essential • Grand Challenges ~2% ~50% ~48% Exploitation & Deployment Discovery & Invention Note: Percentages indicate approximate division of total DoN S&T annual investment in each area. Updated 22 Apr 2003

  2. ONR Strategic Investment Scheme Discovery and Invention (D&I) Exploitation and Deployment (E&D) Enable Acquisition Idea Exploration Basic Research Advanced Technology Unique/Partnerships Innovative Naval Prototypes • Naval Research Diversity (Idea Exploration) • Science shortfalls in topics with Naval interest • Nurturing science opportunity • High impacts/surprises • Naval Unique/Partnerships • National Naval Responsibilities • Core Competencies • Health of Academic pipeline – ideas/workforce • Accelerating Discovery into Innovative Technology • S&T specifically focused on enabling capability • Harvest other agency S&T toward Naval applications • Pushing toward Maturation

  3. Overall DoN S&T Product Flow 6.1 6.2 6.3 Fleet & Force D&I Dropouts FNCs & INPs World of Ideas & S&T Opportunities D&I D&I Dropouts D&I Direct

  4. S&T POM 06 Investment AreasFY 06 $1,776M • Discovery & Invention • ($713M - 40%) • Naval scientific disciplines • NRL/Warfare Centers • National Naval Responsibilities • HM&E (facts of life) • Technical workforce sustainment • High impacts/surprises • FNC’s (TOG Oversight) • Warfighter Protect • Capable Manpower (N1/N00T) • LO/CLO (PMR 51) • GPS (enhancement) • InfoSecurity Protect (N6/SPAWAR) • USCG Vessel Tracking (ASN(RDA)) • Leap-ahead Innovations • ($182M -10%) • Innovative Naval Prototypes • Swampworks • Tech Solutions • SEA TRIAL • Fleet/Force Response Programs • OSD Directed • ($330M – 19%) • JFCOM’s Joint Experimentation • POM-04 PDM (except EM Rail Gun) • PBD’s and earmarks

  5. D&I InvestmentDoN Vision – Naval Needs – S&T Opportunity • DoN Vision & Guidance • Naval Power 21 • Capability Development Process • S&T Options & Opportunities • D&I Investment Process S&T Discoveries & Opportunities

  6. D&I to FNC Process OPNAV N6/N7 Identify GapsCampaign/MCP analysis, What it takes to win metrics Analysis of Opportunities Transition to Acquisition D&I Program Foundation S&T Opportunities Develop Enabling Capabilities (ECs) Define metrics & deliverables, 3-5 year time frame Critical mass and past performance ONR Execution Oversight by FNC IPTs Semi-Annual Reviews TOG Approval of Ranked ECs (urgency, risk, reward, etc)

  7. Key S&T Pathways to Resolving IED Threat • Detection at a Distance • Destruction at a Distance • Defeat at a Distance Deter

  8. Examine entire IED delivery chain to develop systematic countermeasures Obtain Funds Develop Organization Gather & Provide Material Improvise CONOPS / Tactics / Devices Plan Attacks Perform Attacks BOOM Consequence Management Attribution

  9. Counter-IED Strategic Research Vision Predict Detect Prevent Neutralize Mitigate STAGE • Blast resistance • Blast containment • First responders • Medevac • Information Operations • Deny enemy comms • Deny enemy free movement • Deny enemy ISR • Control access to materials • Jamming • Render IED safe • Disposal • Controlled Detonation • Forensic collection • Enemy Interdiction • HUMINT • PSY OPS • Behavioral Pattern Recognition • ISR / COMMS • Forensic Analysis • Sensors • Stand-off Detection • False Alarm Reduction • Pattern Recognition • Remote Surveillance CAPABILITIES • Psychology & Sociology of Terrorists • Information Management • Pattern Recognition • Artificial Intelligence • Explosive Characterization • Sensor Technologies • Signal Processing • Data Fusion • Pattern Recognition • Autonomous System Technologies • RF Communications • Non- Lethal Weapons • Information Management • Artificial Intelligence • Chemistry /Physics of Explosives • Energy-based Weapons • Autonomous System Technologies • Tagging / Marking • Protective Structures • Armor • Knowledge Management • Information Technology RESEARCH THRUSTS

  10. Counter-IED Organization ONR Chief Scientist Executive Steering Committee UARC Directors, NRL Director of Research S. Walker Advisory Group DDR&E, JIEDDTF, Warfare Centers Program Coordinator D. Todoroff Predict Prevent Neutralize Mitigate Detect Coordinator PI PI PI Coordinator PI PI PI Coordinator PI PI PI Coordinator PI PI PI Coordinator PI PI PI

  11. Session IIIB: S&T Executive Perspectives on Getting Technology to the WarfighterThis session will focus, from an S&T perspective, on potential roadblocks to getting technology to the warfighter. Specific issues to be addressed are the right balance between technology transfer and technology base, the proper organizational structure for S&T, the role of industry, challenges for collaborative S&T, and how the S&T community fits in the new approach to capabilities based planning and acquisition. The panel format will be questions posed by the chair with point/counter-point discussion from the panel. Co-Chairs: Colonel Mark Stephen, USAF, Chief, Science and Technology Division, SAF/AQRT Dr. John Solomond, Program Manager C4ISR, Booze Allen Hamilton Moderator: Mr. James Engle, Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Air Force (Science, Technology & Engineering) 3:45 pm Dr. Charles Holland, DUSD (Science & Technology) Dr. Tom Killion, Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Research & Technology) Dr. Starnes Walker, Chief Scientist, ONR Dr. Robert Leheny, Deputy Director, DARPA Ms. Sue Payton, DUSD (Advanced Systems & Concepts)

  12. S&T Investment Categories • Discovery & Invention (D&I) • NRL Base Program • Science shortfalls in topics with Naval interest • Nurturing science opportunity • High impacts/surprises • Health of Academic pipeline – ideas/workforce • National Naval Responsibilities • Ocean Acoustics • Undersea Weaponry • Naval Engineering • Naval Air • (proposed) • Innovative Naval Prototypes (INPs) • TBD Future Naval Capabilities (FNCs) Quick Reaction and Other • Time Critical Strike (TCS) • Organic Mine Countermeasures (OMCM) • Knowledge Superiority & Assurance (KSA) • Littoral Antisubmarine Warfare (LASW) • Expeditionary Logistics (ExLog) • Fleet/Force Protection (FFP) • Littoral Combat and Power Projection (LCCP) • Missile Defense (MD) • Advanced Capability Electric systems (ACES) • Autonomous Ops (AO) • Total Ownership Cost Reduction (TOC) • Capable Manpower (CM) • Warfighter Protection (WP) • Other • Pass-Through - to JFCOM • OSD Directed • Infrastructure - Efforts enabling ONR’s mission execution such as IFO, conferences, outreach • Quick Reaction • Swampworks • Tech Solutions • MCWL

More Related