1 / 22

Sentencing Guidelines°

Sentencing Guidelines°. Steffan Groch. Background to the Proposals. Chronology and background to the Change February 2010 – Sentencing Council Guidelines for Corporate Manslaughter & Health and Safety Offences Causing ( our emphasis) Death

Download Presentation

Sentencing Guidelines°

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sentencing Guidelines° Steffan Groch

  2. Background to the Proposals Chronology and background to the Change • February 2010 – Sentencing Council Guidelines for Corporate Manslaughter & Health and Safety Offences Causing (our emphasis)Death • 2012 - Section 85 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 • January 2014 - R v Sellafield and Network Rail • July 2014 – Updated Environmental Sentencing Guidelines in force – in particular see the guidance issued to the EA • November 2014 – Current guidelines consultation opens (closed 18 February 2015) • There is a piecemeal and often inconsistent approach to sentencing for these offences

  3. Statistics – Health and Safety Offences Health and Safety Offences • 2013 Sentences: 273 – against organisations 146 – against (adult) individuals • 2013 Fines: £46,009 – average fine for organisations 50% of organisations received fines of less than £8,000 5% of organisations received fines of more than £225,000 £4,325 – average fine for individuals

  4. Statistics – Food Safety and Hygiene Offences Food and Hygiene Offences • 2013 Sentences: 56 – against organisations 222 – against (adult) individuals • 2013 Fines: £1,785 – mean fine for organisations 5% of organisations were fined more than £5,000 £810 – average fine for individuals 50% of individuals were fined less than £500 5% of individuals were fined more than £2,500

  5. Aims/Overarching Issues • Punishment and Deterrence • Low Fines – although it is accepted that not all cases are treated too leniently • Focus on large organisations and the most serious offences • Economic impact on management and shareholders • R v Southern Water • Ensuring consistency • Lack of guidance

  6. The Guidelines°

  7. Structure of Guidelines - Corporates • Similar approach to Sentencing Guidelines for Environmental offences • Guidelines set out for: • Health and Safety Offences: Organisations and Individuals • Corporate Manslaughter • Food Safety and Hygiene Offences: Organisations and Individuals • Multi-stage approach to reach the appropriate level – in effect, a tariff based approach • So what are the stages….

  8. Structure of Guidelines - Corporates

  9. Structure of Guidelines - Corporates Stage 1 - Determining the offence category: Culpability

  10. Structure of Guidelines - Corporates Stage 1 - Determining the offence category: Harm (H&S offences)

  11. Structure of Guidelines - Corporates Determining the offence category: Harm (FSH offences)

  12. Structure of Guidelines - Corporates Starting Point and Category Range • Categorisation based upon turnover: • Large £50m plus • Medium £10m – 50m • Small £2m – 10m • Micro £0 – 2m • Size + Culpability + Harm = Starting Point and Range • Aggravating/mitigating factors – nothing new • New starting points vs sentencing trends to date: • Health and Safety offences • Food Safety & Hygiene offences

  13. Structure of Guidelines - Corporates Is fine proportionate to means? • Flexibility to adjust the fine to the offender’s particular circumstances • Court must also consider the principles of sentencing • If it finds reason for doing so, the sentencing court can move outside the ranges proposed at step two Steps 4 to 9 • Further reflection upon fine and possible means of adjustment

  14. Structure of Guidelines - Individuals • Range of sentencing options available • Guidelines include specific guidance on fining individuals Points to note • Culpability classed as either Deliberate, Reckless, Negligent or Low • Penalties and interaction with other sentencing options • Fines ranging from 25% to 700% of weekly income; • Manager on £60,000 pa found guilty of a reckless health and safety breach resulting in long term physical impairment could receive fine of £8,000 • Manager on £60,000 pa found guilty of a negligent food safety breach resulting in a serious adverse effect on human health could also receive fine of £8,000

  15. Corporate Manslaughter • Guideline currently in force for Corporate Manslaughter (“CM”) and Health and Safety Offences resulting in fatality – to be replaced • Changes to sentencing of HS offences require change to CM offences • Step 1 – assessment of Seriousness • Step 2 – Financial assessment and Starting Points • Steps 3 to 9 – largely similar to those outlined above

  16. Corporate Manslaughter

  17. Case Studies: How cases would be treated under the new regime Health and Safety offences R v Network Rail • Turnover of £6.2 billion and profit of £780,000,000 – although a ‘not for dividend’ company • Serious accident at a level crossing – poor visibility and no telephone • 10 year-old son of the driver suffered life-changing brain damage • The company pleaded guilty and was fined £500,000 Guidelines • Assessment: Large, High Level Culpability, Category 1 Harm • Starting point: £2,400,000 (albeit reduced at stage 3)

  18. Case Studies: How cases would be treated under the new regime R v X • Company turnover of c.£7,000,000, although part of a group structure • Serious physical and psychological injuries after exposure to chemical substances – death was foreseeable • Systematic failures; absence of any risk assessment for activities • The Company pleaded guilty and was fined £10,000 plus costs of c. £700 Guidelines • Assessment: Small, Medium Level Culpability, Category 2 Harm • Starting Point £54,000

  19. Moving Forwards°

  20. Considerations for the Future What practical lessons can be learnt from the guidelines/discussions today: • Safety and Food Safety & Hygiene, as it already is within your respective organisations, is a key concern. • Potential fines for health and safety/food safety & hygiene offences will increasingly move them up the boardroom agenda. • Particularly for ‘large’ organisations under the guidelines, potential levels of fine for these and CM offences change the nature previous fines: • What needs to be taken away from day? • Reappraisal of risk register and implications: • Level of reserve and financial planning – banking covenants, lending and credit worthiness, shareholder scrutiny etc; • Impact upon EL/PL Insurance and premiums: greater need to demonstrate risk management systems and work collaboratively with Insurer/Brokers – Insurer funding models? • Consideration of organisational structure; sufficient concern to justify creation of separate entities to contain risk?

  21. Considerations for the Future • Greater focus upon issues of corporate governance • Initiated by judgments in Sellafield and Network Rail, but necessitated by culpability assessment in guidelines; need for demonstrable board level involvement • Continued need to ensure individuals are aware of their duties; both individually and as a key element of organisational compliance • Increased need for robust incident management procedures • Greater financial exposure at ‘lower end’ of spectrum (and implications for future culpability assessment) necessitates coherent company approach • Change in appetite to defend cases? Implications for the approach to internal investigation from outset • Fee for Intervention invoices for H&S offences, or challenging Improvement Notices etc; be wary • Appetite to defend cases / Newton hearings

More Related