1 / 30

62323: Architectural Structures II

Monther Dwaikat Assistant Professor Department of Building Engineering An-Najah National University. 62323: Architectural Structures II. Design of Beam-Columns. Beam-Column - Outline. Beam-Columns Moment Amplification Analysis Braced and Unbraced Frames

donovan-harris
Download Presentation

62323: Architectural Structures II

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Monther Dwaikat Assistant Professor Department of Building Engineering An-Najah National University 62323: Architectural Structures II Design ofBeam-Columns 68402

  2. Beam-Column - Outline • Beam-Columns • Moment Amplification Analysis • Braced and Unbraced Frames • Analysis/Design of Braced Frames • Design of Base Plates 68402

  3. Design for Flexure – LRFD Spec. • Commonly Used Sections: • I – shaped members (singly- and doubly-symmetric) • Square and Rectangular or round HSS 68402

  4. Beam-Columns • Likely failure modes due to combined bending and axial forces: • Bending and Tension: usually fail by yielding • Bending (uniaxial) and compression: Failure by buckling in the plane of bending, without torsion • Bending (strong axis) and compression: Failure by LTB • Bending (biaxial) and compression (torsionally stiff section): Failure by buckling in one of the principal directions. • Bending (biaxial) and compression (thin-walled section): failure by combined twisting and bending • Bending (biaxial) + torsion + compression: failure by combined twisting and bending 68402

  5. Beam-Columns • Structural elements subjected to combined flexural moments and axial loads are called beam-columns • The case of beam-columns usually appears in structural frames • The code requires that the sum of the load effects be smaller than the resistance of the elements • Thus: a column beam interaction can be written as • This means that a column subjected to axial load and moment will be able to carry less axial load than if no moment would exist. 68402

  6. Beam-Columns • AISC code makes a distinct difference between lightly and heavily axial loaded columns AISC Equation AISC Equation 68402

  7. Beam-Columns • Definitions Pu = factored axial compression load Pn = nominal compressive strength Mux = factored bending moment in the x-axis, including second-order effects Mnx = nominal moment strength in the x-axis Muy = same as Mux except for the y-axis Mny = same as Mnx except for the y-axis c = Strength reduction factor for compression members = 0.90 b = Strength reduction factor for flexural members = 0.90 68402

  8. Beam-Columns • The increase in slope for lightly axial-loaded columns represents the less effect of axial load compared to the heavily axial-loaded columns Unsafe Element Pu/fcPn Safe Element 0.2 Mu/fbMn These are design charts that are a bit conservative than behaviour envelopes 68402

  9. P P d M d x Moment Amplification • When a large axial load exists, the axial load produces moments due to any element deformation. • The final moment “M” is the sum of the original moment and the moment due to the axial load. The moment is therefore said to be amplified. • As the moment depends on the load and the original moment, the problem is nonlinear and thus it is called second-order problem. 68402

  10. Braced and Unbraced Frames • Two components of amplification moments can be observed in unbraced frames: • Moment due to member deflection (similar to braced frames) • Moment due to sidesway of the structure Unbraced Frames Member deflection Member sidesway 68402

  11. Unbraced and Braced Frames • In braced frames amplification moments can only happens due to member deflection Braced Frames Sidesway bracing system Member deflection 68402

  12. Unbraced and Braced Frames • Braced frames are those frames prevented from sidesway. • In this case the moment amplification equation can be simplified to: AISC Equation • KL/r for the axis of bending considered • K ≤ 1.0 68402

  13. Unbraced and Braced Frames • The coefficient Cm is used to represent the effect of end moments on the maximum deflection along the element (only for braced frames) • When there is transverse loading on the beam either of the following case applies 68402

  14. Ex. 5.1- Beam-Columns in Braced Frames A 3.6-m W12x96 is subjected to bending and compressive loads in a braced frame. It is bent in single curvature with equal and opposite end moments and is not loaded transversely. Use Grade 50 steel. Is the section satisfactory if Pu = 3200 kN and first-order moment Mntx = 240 kN.m Step I: From Section Property Table W12x96 (A = 18190 mm2, Ix = 347x106 mm4, Lp = 3.33 m, Lr = 14.25 m, Zx = 2409 mm3, Sx = 2147 mm3) 68402

  15. Ex. 5.1- Beam-Columns in Braced Frames Step II: Compute amplified moment - For a braced frame let K = 1.0 KxLx = KyLy = (1.0)(3.6) = 3.6 m - From Column Chapter: cPn = 4831 kN Pu/cPn = 3200/4831 = 0.662 > 0.2  Use eqn. - There is no lateral translation of the frame: Mlt = 0  Mux = B1Mntx Cm = 0.6 – 0.4(M1/M2) = 0.6 – 0.4(-240/240) = 1.0 Pe1 = 2EIx/(KxLx)2 = 2(200)(347x106)/(3600)2 = 52851 kN 68402

  16. Ex. 5.1- Beam-Columns in Braced Frames Mux= (1.073)(240) = 257.5 kN.m Step III: Compute moment capacity Since Lb = 3.6 m Lp< Lb< Lr 68402

  17. Ex. 5.1- Beam-Columns in Braced Frames Step IV: Check combined effect  Section is satisfactory 68402

  18. Ex. 5.2- Analysis of Beam-Column • Check the adequacy of an ASTM A992 W14x90 column subjected to an axial force of 2200 kN and a second order bending moment of 400 kN.m. The column is 4.2 m long, is bending about the strong axis. Assume: • ky = 1.0 • Lateral unbraced length of the compression flange is 4.2 m. 68402

  19. Ex. 5.2- Analysis of Beam-Column • Step I: Compute the capacities of the beam-column cPn = 4577 kN Mnx = 790 kN.m Mny = 380 kN.m • Step II: Check combined effect OK 68402

  20. Design of Beam-Columns • Trial-and-error procedure • Select trial section • Check appropriate interaction formula. • Repeat until section is satisfactory 68402

  21. Ex. 5.3 – Design-Beam Column • Select a W shape of A992 steel for the beam-column of the following figure. This member is part of a braced frame and is subjected to the service-load axial force and bending moments shown (the end shears are not shown). Bending is about the strong axis, and Kx = Ky = 1.0. Lateral support is provided only at the ends. Assume that B1 = 1.0. PD = 240 kN PL = 650 kN MD = 24.4 kN.m ML = 66.4 kN.m 4.8 m MD = 24.4 kN.m ML = 66.4 kN.m 68402

  22. Ex. 5.3 – Design-Beam Column • Step I: Compute the factored axial load and bending moments Pu = 1.2PD + 1.6PL = 1.2(240)+ 1.6(650) = 1328 kN. Mntx = 1.2MD + 1.6ML = 1.2(24.4)+ 1.6(66.4) = 135.5 kN.m. B1 = 1.0  Mux = B1Mntx = 1.0(135.5) = 135.5 kN.m • Step II: compute Mnx, Pn • The effective length for compression and the unbraced length for bending are the same = KL = Lb = 4.8 m. • The bending is uniform over the unbraced length , so Cb=1.0 • Try a W10X60 with Pn = 2369 kN and Mnx= 344 kN.m 68402

  23. Ex. 5.3 – Design-Beam Column • Step III: Check interaction equation • Step IV: Make sure that this is the lightest possible section.  Try W12x58 with Pn = 2247 kN and Mnx= 386 kN.m  Use a W12 x 58 section OK 68402

  24. Design of Base Plates • We are looking for design of concentrically loaded columns. These base plates are connected using anchor bolts to concrete or masonry footings • The column load shall spread over a large area of the bearing surface underneath the base plate AISC Manual Part 16, J8 68402

  25. Design of Base Plates • The design approach presented here combines three design approaches for light, heavy loaded, small and large concentrically loaded base plates Area of Plate is computed such that n m B 0.8 bf where: If plate covers the area of the footing 0.95d N If plate covers part of the area of the footing • The dimensions of the plate are computed such that m and n are approximately equal. A1 = area of base plate A2 = area of footing f’c = compressive strength of concrete used for footing 68402

  26. Nominal bearing strength Design of Base Plates Thickness of plate However  may be conservatively taken as 1 68402

  27. Ex. 5.4 – Design of Base Plate • For the column base shown in the figure, design a base plate if the factored load on the column is 10000 kN. Assume 3 m x 3 m concrete footing with concrete strength of 20 MPa. N 0.95d W14x211 0.8bf B 68402

  28. Ex. 5.4 - Design of Base Plate • Step I: Plate dimensions • Assume thus: • Assume m = n • N = 729.8 mm say N = 730 mm B = 671.8 mm say B = 680 mm 68402

  29. Ex. 5.4 - Design of Base Plate • Step II: Plate thickness 68402

  30. Ex. 5.4 - Design of Base Plate • Selecting the largest cantilever length • use 730 mm x 670 mm x 80 mm Plate 68402

More Related