1 / 35

Coriolis Force and Ekman Flow in Oceanic Gyres

Exploring the relationship between Coriolis force, vertical mixing, and Ekman flow in the wind-driven circulation of oceanic gyres. Analysis of surface current measurements and the Sverdrup Relation.

doreeng
Download Presentation

Coriolis Force and Ekman Flow in Oceanic Gyres

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Question: Why 45o, physics or math? Physics: Coriolis force is balanced by vertical mixing (friction) for Ekman flow If Az is constant, and are perpendicular to each other 45o relation is not likely to hold Only if B=0, i.e., as z- 45o relation holds for boundary layer solution

  2. Question: Why 45o, physics or math? Physics: Coriolis force is balanced by vertical mixing (friction) for Ekman flow If Az is not constant, and are not likely perpendicular to each other 45o relation is not likely to hold even for boundary layer solution

  3. Wind-driven circulation II Wind pattern and oceanic gyres Sverdrup Relation Vorticity Equation

  4. What generate the gyre circulation?

  5. Surface current measurement from ship drift Current measurements are harder to make than T&S The data are much sparse.

  6. http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/phod/dac/gdp_drifter.php

  7. Surface current observations

  8. Surface current observations

  9. http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/phod/dac/drifter_climatology.html A climatology of near-surface currents and SST for the world, at one degree resolution, derived from satellite-tracked surface drifting buoy observations. Most recent data included: 1 January 2011. Reference: Lumpkin, R. and Z. Garraffo, 2005: Evaluating the Decomposition of Tropical Atlantic Drifter Observations. J. Atmos. Oceanic Techn. I 22, 1403-1415. Lumpkin, R. and S. L. Garzoli, 2005: Near-surface Circulation in the Tropical Atlantic Ocean. Deep-Sea Res. I 52(3),495-518, 10.1016/j.dsr.2004.09.001.

  10. Drifting Buoy Data Assembly Center, Miami, Florida Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory, NOAA

  11. Annual Mean Surface CurrentPacific Ocean, 1995-2003 Drifting Buoy Data Assembly Center, Miami, Florida Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory, NOAA

  12. Schematic picture of the major surface currents of the world oceans Note the anticyclonic circulation in the subtropics (the subtropical gyres)

  13. Relation between surface winds and subtropical gyres

  14. Surface winds and oceanic gyres: A more realistic view Note that the North Equatorial Counter Current (NECC) is against the direction of prevailing wind.

  15. Sverdrup Relation Consider the following balance in an ocean of depth h of flat bottom (1) (2) Integrating vertically from –h to 0 for both (1) and (2), we have (neglecting bottom stress and surface height change) (3) (4) where are total zonal and meridional transport of mass sum of geostrophic and ageostropic transports

  16. Define We have (3) and (4) can be written as (6) (5) Differentiating , we have

  17. Using continuity equation And define We have Sverdrup equation Vertical component of the wind stress curl If The line provides a natural boundary that separate the circulation into “gyres”

  18. is the total meridional mass transport Geostrophic transport Ekman transport Order of magnitude example: At 35oN, -4 s-1, 2  10-11 m-1 s-1, assume x10-1 Nm-2 y=0

  19. then

  20. Since , we have set x =0 at the eastern boundary, Further assume In the trade wind and equatorial zones, the 2nd derivative term dominates:

  21. Mass Transport Since Let , , where  is stream function.  Problem: only one boundary condition can be satisfied.

  22. 1 Sverdrup (Sv) =106 m3/s

  23. A More General Form of Sverdrup Equation Surface stress curl Bottom stress curl Bottom topography effect Vanish if the bottom is flat Or flow follows topographic contour

More Related