1 / 14

Suicide and self-harm prevention in prison

Suicide and self-harm prevention in prison. Nigel Newcomen Prisons and Probation Ombudsman. Bradley Group meeting 20 June 201 7. Agenda . The PPO A system still in crisis? Still a rising toll of despair What is ACCT? Is ACCT still fit for purpose? Conclusion. A bout t he PPO. Roles

doriane
Download Presentation

Suicide and self-harm prevention in prison

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Suicide and self-harm prevention in prison Nigel Newcomen Prisons and Probation Ombudsman Bradley Group meeting 20 June 2017

  2. Agenda • The PPO • A system still in crisis? • Still a rising toll of despair • What is ACCT? • Is ACCT still fit for purpose? • Conclusion

  3. About the PPO • Roles • Independent investigation of complaints from prisoners, immigration detainees, child detainees and those under probation supervision • Independent investigation of deaths in prisons, IRCs, STCs, SCHs and probation approved premises • Newer emphasis on thematic learning, library of 40 publications since 2012 • Vision: carry out independent investigations to make custody and community supervision safer and fairer

  4. System still in crisis • We started investigations into 361 deaths 2016-17 (up 19%) • 115 self inflicted (up 11%) • 208 natural causes (up 19%) • 4 homicides (down from 6) and 34 “other” • Of all deaths, 88% were adult males • Female deaths more than doubled (23) • 11 deaths in APs, 3 in IRCs, 2 in SCHs • 5,026 complaints (up 5%), of which 2,569 eligible (up 10%) • Unprecedented levels of violence • Many of the same issues recurring and lessons either not being learned or learning not being sustained

  5. Still a rising toll of despair • Continuing, tragic 11% rise in self-inflicted deaths may beless than the 34% rise 2015-16 but no grounds for complacency • Hard to be definitive about cause of continuing rise: • Staffing cuts, crowding and regime restrictions must all play a part in reducing protective factors against self-inflicted deaths • So must troubling levels of mental ill health • And an epidemic of new psychoactive substances • But each case is an individual crisis, an individual story and no simple, single explanation suffices

  6. “Learning from PPO investigations: prisoner mental health” Published January 2016 A thematic review of the identification of mental health needs and the provision of mental health care for prisoners, based on the learning from our fatal incident investigations. Available online: http://www.ppo.gov.uk/?p=6737 • 15/11/2016 • European Custody and Detention Summit

  7. “Learning lessons bulletin: new psychoactive substances” Published July 2015 Examines the death of prisoners suspected to have been using NPS Considers risks and behaviour related to NPS use Available online: http://www.ppo.gov.uk/?p=6137 • 15/11/2016 • European Custody and Detention Summit

  8. Still a rising toll of self-inflicted deaths • In a complex context, without simple answers, effective efforts by staff are key to preventing self-inflicted deaths. • PPO investigations show much commendable work by staff • But, in a strained prison system, suicide and self-harm procedures (ACCT) not being consistently applied. • As a result, investigations often repeat the same lessons. • This is not good enough and I frequently have to call on prison staff to redouble their efforts. • On the basis of these repeat failures - and what staff tell us - I also continue to question whether effective ACCT still deliverable within current resources

  9. What is ACCT? • Introduced in 2005, Assessment Care in Custody and Teamwork (ACCT) is the HMPPS care-planning system used to support prisoners at risk of suicide or self-harm. • Its purpose is to try to determine the level of risk, how to reduce the risk and how best to monitor and supervise the prisoner.  • Process: • initial assessment of prisoner’s main concerns • set levels of supervision and interactions according to perceived risk of harm • checks should be irregular to prevent the prisoner anticipating when they will occur.

  10. What is ACCT? • There should be regular multi-disciplinary review meetings involving the prisoner.  • A caremap (plan of care, support and intervention) should be put in place and the ACCT not closed until all actions completed. • All decisions and any relevant observations should be written in the ACCT booklet, which should accompany the prisoner as they move around the prison. • Guidance on ACCT procedures is set out in Prison Service Instruction (PSI) 64/2011.

  11. Is ACCT fit for purpose? • In concept, as good as any suicide and self-harm prevention system in any other jurisdiction taking a holistic “whole prison approach” not a limited medical model • Need to be honest and acknowledge that no set of processes will prevent all self-inflicted deaths • Alos mustn’t underestimate role of a safe environment, activity, good staff\prisoner interactions and supportive healthcare • But repeat failures in ACCT reported in investigations suggest disconnect between policy and practice • My (last) annual report (July 2017) will again call on HMPPS to assure itself that staff can effectively implement ACCT.

  12. Is ACCT fit for purpose? Issues • Can’t escape resource question: ACCT devised at a time when fewer prisoners and more staff • Dependent on ordinary staff – hence Harris review called for creation of specialist Custody and Rehabilitation Officers • Requires resources staff often complain do not exist • Reception and first night key times to identify risk but also among the busiest processes in local prison • Huge amount of risk and need to manage • Training essential but often deficient • Struggle to achieve continuity of care and case management • Entirely paper based

  13. Is ACCT fit for purpose? • Last time I raised similar concerns (2013) there was a cursory review, followed by record numbers of suicides and more repeated PPO recommendations • Now some hope with prison reform agenda, which is reinvesting in prisons and prioritising safer custody • New operational assurance programme underway which may help answer concerns over ACCT • Key workers may increase consistent interactions • Devolution may encourage innovation • But a long, long way to go

  14. Conclusion • Prisons in England and Wales facing huge challenges, not least continued and unacceptable increase in self-inflicted deaths • No simple answers • But unacceptable that some deaths reflect repeated failings • These repeated failures – and staff concerns - raise questions over fitness for purpose of ACCT, or at least its deliverability • Much hinges on prison reform but progress will be limited without greater safety and fairness • Prisons need to get better at learning lessons • PPO investigations and thematic learning will continue to support the search for improvement and greater safety

More Related