230 likes | 389 Views
The Megamaser Cosmology Project. Jim Braatz NRAO. Co-I’s: Mark Reid Lincoln Greenhill Fred Lo Jim Condon Christian Henkel Ingyin Zaw Avanti Tilak Lei Hao
E N D
The Megamaser Cosmology Project Jim Braatz NRAO Co-I’s: Mark Reid Lincoln Greenhill Fred Lo Jim Condon Christian Henkel Ingyin Zaw Avanti Tilak Lei Hao Cheng-Yu Kuo Liz Humphreys
The Impact of an H0 Prior on CMB Models H0 = 72 ± 3r ± 7s km s-1 Mpc-1 Freedman et al. 2001 H0 = 62 ± 1r ± 5s km s-1 Mpc-1 Sandage et al. 2006 WMAP Likelihood Surfaces Independent measurement of H0 is required to constrain the cosmological model.
Water masers in AGN Accretion Disks • H2O emission at 22 GHz • N(H2) ~ 108 - 1010 cm-3 • T ~ 400 - 1000 K UGC 3789: Braatz & Gugliucci 2008
Measuring Distances to H2O Megamasers NGC 4258 • NGC 4258 is the prototype for the maser distance method • BUT this galaxy is too close to determine H0 directly • Nearby maser galaxies like NGC 4258 can be used to recalibrate the Cepheid scale Vr D = r/ 2Vr 2 a = Vr2/r D = Vr2/a Herrnstein et al. (1999) D = 7.2 0.5 Mpc
The Megamaser Cosmology Project • In the framework of cosmology set by analysis of CMB anisotropies, a precise measurement of H0 will provide a strong constraint on the equation of state parameter, w, of dark energy. • The MCP is an NRAO “Large Project” with the goal, in about 5 years, of determining H0 to 3% by measuring angular diameter distances to about 10 galaxies in the Hubble flow. The Process: Survey with the GBT to identify maser disk galaxies Image the sub-pc disks with the High Sensitivity Array (VLBA+GBT+EB) Measure accelerations in the disk with GBT monitoring Model the maser disk dynamics and determine distance to the host galaxy
Progress in Megamaser Surveys • 112 Extragalactic maser galaxies are now known • About 30% have h.v. components > 250 km s-1 • About 10% are disk masers and are candidates for high precision distance measurements • Primary sample for new surveys: Type 2 AGNs from SDSS
UGC 3789 MBH ~ 1.0 x 107 Msunfrom acceleration analysis Braatz and Gugliucci, 2008
UGC 3789 Reid et al, in prep.
UGC 3789 Preliminary Properties of UGC 3789 Maser Disk R ~ 0.09 - 0.20 pc (0.40 - 0.87 mas) V ~ 750 - 450 km/s Mbh ~ 1.2 x 107 Msun a ~ 3.6 km s-1 yr-1 (mean value) D ~ 51 Mpc (15%) H0 ~ 65 km s-1 Mpc-1 Braatz et al, in prep.
The Extragalactic Distance Scale Largest Structures NGC 4258 UGC 3789 NGC 3393 NGC 1194 NGC 6323 Mrk 1419 IC 2560 Cepheids Direct Measurement of H0 0 Mpc 100 Mpc 200 Mpc • One method covers all scales out to the size of largest structures • Maser distances can be used to calibrate other distance methods e.g. Cepheids, SN Ia, Tully-Fisher
The CMB and Cosmology • “The single most important complement to the CMB for measuring the DE equation of state at z ~ 0.5 is a determination of the Hubble constant to better than a few percent.” • Hu 2005 • The CMB on its own does not measure many fundamental parameters; instead there are degemeracies. E.g. Ωmh2 • Independent measurement of H0 is necessary Spergel et al., 2007 (WMAP 3-yr)
The Accretion Disk in NGC 4258 • Warp in the disk is fully characterized • Accelerations measured in both systemic and h.v. features • Blue features absorbed by gas in the disk • Disk characterization reduces systematic error in distance determination • Alternative to LMC to anchor the extragalactic distance scale Humphreys et al. 2008 (CfA group)
A GBT Gallery of Extragalactic H2O masers Braatz and Gugliucci, 2008, ApJ, 678, 96
Measuring Distances to H2O Megamasers The Prototype: NGC 4258 Vr D = r/ a = Vr2/r D = Vr2/a 2Vr 2 Herrnstein et al. (1999) D = 7.2 0.5 Mpc Herrnstein et al. 1999
Disk Masers in the Era of VSOP-2 • Precision measurement of disk geometry • Substructure: striation and spiral structure • What fraction of the disk do masers trace? (skin structure) • Accurate characterization of the disk is critical to minimize systematic errors • Constraints on blended systemic features • Elliptical orbits? • Distinguish phase effects from maser clump effects • Proper motion measurements? (~ 3 µas yr-1 for UGC 3789) • Sensitivity (and flex scheduling) is essential (Baselines to GBT, EVLA, EB)