1 / 6

Sweatshops

Sweatshops . A sweatshop is defined as a factory that violates 2 or more labour laws. Sweatshops often have poor working conditions, unfair wages, unreasonable hours, child labour, and a lack of benefits for workers.

dorjan
Download Presentation

Sweatshops

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sweatshops A sweatshop is defined as a factory that violates 2 or more labour laws. Sweatshops often have poor working conditions, unfair wages, unreasonable hours, child labour, and a lack of benefits for workers. In developing countries, an estimated 250 million children ages 5-14 are forced to work. Developed countries have stronger labour laws than most undeveloped countries, but it is not free of sweatshops. Products that commonly come from sweatshops are shoes, clothing, rugs, coffee, chocolate, toys, and bananas. A study showed that doubling the salary of sweatshop workers would only increase the consumer cost of an item by 1.8 percent, while consumers would be willing to pay 15 percent more to know a product did not come from a sweatshop. Sweatshops do not alleviate poverty. The people who are forced to work must spend the majority of their paycheck on food for their families to survive. According to the National Labor Committee, women sewing NBA jerseys make 24 cents per garment that will eventually sell for $140. Men and women alike are subjected to verbal, physical, and sexual abuse in factories from their managers and supervisors. They are sometimes trapped in the factory and forced to work overnight or across multiple shifts. In 2000, more than 11,000 sweatshops in the U.S. violated the minimum wage and overtime laws, while over 16,000 had broken health and safety laws. Because women make up 85-90 percent of sweatshop workers, employers force them to take birth control and routine pregnancy tests to avoid supporting maternity leave or providing appropriate health benefits.

  2. Nike is one of the largest athletic shoe brands in the world. While the company sells millions of shoes and pieces of clothing each year, Nike does not produce any of these products. Instead, the company contracts with manufacturing facilities located throughout the world. Nearly 800,000 people work in these factories, located primarily in Asia. Since the 1990s, the company has been criticized for the working conditions and low wages at these factories, with many critics accusing the company of profiting from sweatshop labour. While Nike has made efforts to improve conditions, many rights groups still push for higher wages and greater change.

  3. Sometimes people get concerned that if you doubled workers wages, then Nike's sneakers would cost $800 and then no one would buy them and then all the workers we are trying to help would be put out of work. This argument is not supported by the facts. See #2 above. The increase would only be $2.50 on a pair a sneakers. If Nike were to pass this additional cost onto consumers, that would mean that a $125 pair of Air Force Ones would now cost $127.50 or a $200 pair of Jordan's would cost $202.50. Again that is IF they pass the entire increase on to consumers. If they were to take 7% of their marketing budget and redirect it to wages (meaning for example, that Tiger Woods only gets $20,000,000.00 instead of $100,000,000.00), then they could double workers wages and keep the retail price the same

  4. FACTs about Nike’s labour abuses • FACT #1. Nike violates local minimum wage laws, pays subsistence wages and illegally forces massive overtime: • Vietnam: People are illegally forced to work 65 hrs/wk, for 15c/hr [E&Y], or 20c/hr while 3 simple meals would cost $2.10 [VLW, CBS]. • Vietnam: Nike publicly denies violating the legal minimum wage of $45/month, but their own secret studies prove otherwise [E&Y], as do pay stubs [VLW]. • China: People are illegally forced to pay their first month’s salary as a "deposit", which they lose if they leave within a year [WP]. Haiti: People are paid 30c/hr, not enough to educate children or eat [GRP], but Nike is moving to China where pay is even less [NPR]. • FAQ #1. Why do people keep taking the jobs? • Nearly 75% of Indonesia Nike workers quit per year [LAW], having been deceived about the boot-camp conditions, violations of minimum-wage and overtime laws, higher costs of living near the factories, etc. [VLW, WP]. Wars (e.g., Vietnam), dictatorships (e.g., Indonesia), and coerced foreign corporate land-grabs (across the Third World) make some destitute enough to prostitute their children, become literal slaves, and endure sweatshops. • FACT #2. Nike subjects workers (90% young women and girls) to criminally dangerous, brutal sweatshops: • Vietnam/China: Chemicals causing liver, kidney and brain damage are at 177 times the legal limit, and 77% of workers suffer respiratory problems [E&Y] most exposed workers are given neither protective gear [E&Y] nor the truth [WP]. • Indonesia/Vietnam: people commonly faint from exhaustion, heat, fumes, and poor nutrition [VLW], some die w/o medical attention after collapsing on the job [SMH], a typical 20-hr./day factory with 6000 workers has only one doctor, for 2 hrs./day [VLW], and people are fired immediately if they take sick leave [SMH]. • Indonesia: 56 women are forced to run in the hot sun for wearing "nonregulation shoes", until 12 are hospitalized [NYT3]. Nike-paid Andrew Young [#8 below] dreamily reasons "That’s the way they do things there; you run around to get your motor started" [JH]. • Vietnam: 15 women are beat on head and neck (with a Nike shoe) by a supervisor, for "poor sewing” are hospitalized. 970 workers go on strike in protest. Nike CEO Philip Knight lies to shareholders that only 1 worker was hit, on the arm [CBS]. • Vietnam: After newspaper descriptions of violent sexual molestation, Nike CEO Knight lies to shareholders that the supervisor was trying to wake up the women and "perhaps touched a part that he should not have". Nike allows him to flee prosecution. [VLW]

  5. Facts and FAQ’s • FACT #2. Nike subjects workers (90% young women and girls) to criminally dangerous, brutal sweatshops: • Vietnam/China: Chemicals causing liver, kidney and brain damage are at 177 times the legal limit, and 77% of workers suffer respiratory problems [E&Y] most exposed workers are given neither protective gear [E&Y] nor the truth [WP]. • Indonesia/Vietnam: people commonly faint from exhaustion, heat, fumes, and poor nutrition [VLW], some die w/o medical attention after collapsing on the job [SMH], a typical 20-hr./day factory with 6000 workers has only one doctor, for 2 hrs./day [VLW], and people are fired immediately if they take sick leave [SMH]. • Indonesia: 56 women are forced to run in the hot sun for wearing "nonregulation shoes", until 12 are hospitalized [NYT3]. Nike-paid Andrew Young [#8 below] dreamily reasons "That’s the way they do things there; you run around to get your motor started" [JH]. • Vietnam: 15 women are beat on head and neck (with a Nike shoe) by a supervisor, for "poor sewing” are hospitalized. 970 workers go on strike in protest. Nike CEO Philip Knight lies to shareholders that only 1 worker was hit, on the arm [CBS]. • Vietnam: After newspaper descriptions of violent sexual molestation, Nike CEO Knight lies to shareholders that the supervisor was trying to wake up the women and "perhaps touched a part that he should not have". Nike allows him to flee prosecution. [VLW]

  6. Facts continued • FAQ #2. Do other shoe companies act the same way? • The clothing industry as a whole does mistreat its workers, nearly worldwide. All this dirty laundry needs a public airing, but we must start somewhere, and at UM that means Nike [see reverse]. Some Nike factories also produce shoes for rival companies, under similar conditions, but Asian factories wholly devoted to other companies (even Reebok) have much better pay and working conditions [VLW]. Nike can afford good practices w/o higher prices. • FACT #3. Nike supports military dictatorships that crush labour unions and worker protest: • Bangladesh: police attack peaceful protests on behalf of jailed coworkers: 9 jailed, 250 injured, 97 fired, 800 criminally charged [ID]. Indonesia: In April ‘97, 10,000 of the 13,000 workers at a Nike factory strike demanding that the factory owners not cheat them out of a paltry 20c/day raise in the minimum wage [CLR9]. Indonesia: a worker is locked in a factory room for a week under military interrogation about labour organizing [NYT3]. Indonesia: A new Manpower Bill prohibits independent unions and strikes on public areas while allowing ejection from company areas, and requires advance submission of names of strike leaders to a military dictator who has murdered millions of civilians [CLR9]. Indonesia: 30% of Nike’s total business costs goes to payoffs for Indonesian generals, government officials, and cronies [ECON]. 1996 Nobel Peace Prize winner José Ramos-Horta: "Nike should be treated as enemies, in the same manner we view armies and governments that perpetrate human rights violations. What is the difference between the behaviour of Nike in Indonesia and elsewhere, and the Japanese imperial army during WWII?" [AR] • FAQ #3. Do Nike jobs raise living standards in the long run? • Foreign investment sometimes does this, but only when coupled with support for labor organizing and democratization, with decent pay and conditions, and with commitment to the local economy when things get better. Nike runs in reverse. In Indonesia, "Nike has created 115,000 jobs that pay near-subsistence wages, but even [military] government officials grouse that such operations generate little self-sustaining economic development" [LAW].

More Related