1 / 48

Vanderbilt University Aerospace Club

USLI Preliminary Design Review December 9, 2010. Vanderbilt University Aerospace Club. Agenda for Presentation. Introduction Changes Since Proposal Vehicle Criteria Payload Criteria Educational Outreach Conclusion Questions. 2011 Project Introduction.

dougal
Download Presentation

Vanderbilt University Aerospace Club

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. USLI Preliminary Design Review December 9, 2010 Vanderbilt University Aerospace Club

  2. Agenda for Presentation • Introduction • Changes Since Proposal • Vehicle Criteria • Payload Criteria • Educational Outreach • Conclusion • Questions

  3. 2011 Project Introduction • Simulation of cruising airplane flight conditions through low-altitude rocket flight • Use of cryogenic injection to establish ambient flight parity

  4. Changes Made Since Proposal • Vehicle: • Detailed design established • Dimensions slightly altered • Payload: • Cool half of TEGs instead of all • Invert cryogen tank • Educational Engagement: • Expanded and improved • Test plans established for vehicle and payload

  5. Vehicle Criteria

  6. Vehicle Dimensions • Length: 10’-5” • Diameter: 7.5” • Weight: about 64 lbs loaded • Assumes additional “ballast” weight added • Can be adjusted for wind, or to shift the CG forward/aftward • Center of pressure at 95.8” aft

  7. Materials • Body • two 4’-long epoxy-reinforced phenolic DynaWind body tubes from Giant Leap • Nosecone • ogive-shaped, commercially available, fiberglass nosecone with 29” of exposed length – from Public Missiles • Centering Rings and Bulkheads • ½” birch plywood (4 centering rings for the MMT) • Fins • swept-trapezoid, Nomex honeycomb fin stock from Giant Leap

  8. Static Stability Margin • Rocket Diameter • 7.5” nominal ID • Center of Pressure • 95.8” aft (with M520 motor) • Center of Gravity • 82.5” aft • Stability Ratio: 1.73 calibers

  9. Safety Verification and Testing • Subscale launch • Re-evaluate the thrust and flight characteristics using an aft payload attachment • Full scale launch • First test launch to test its flightworthiness • Second launch to test the payload and its effects on the rocket flight • Ground testing • Test the ejection systems on the ground prior to full scale test launch

  10. Safety Verification and Testing • RockSim design and simulation • Subscale launch • Subscale rocket will be flown to test systems: • Recovery/charge deployment • Motor set up • Launch Operations • Full scale launch • First test launch to test flightworthiness • Second launch to test payload and its effects on the rocket in competition configuration • Ground testing • Test the ejection systems on the ground prior to full scale test launch

  11. Motor Criteria: • Provide sufficient thrust for stable, safe flight from a 16’ launch rail. • Maximize rocket burn time to allow for experimental data collection. • Achieve an altitude of one mile AGL. • Considered: • Cesaroni Pro98 L610 • Cesaroni Pro98 M520  Selected

  12. Motor • Selected Motor: Cesaroni Pro98 M520 • Longer burn time provides more data • Higher initial thrust = better initial thrust-to-weight ratio

  13. Cesaroni Pro98 M520 • Initial thrust: 1184 N / 266 lbf • Thrust to weight ratio: 4.2 : 1 • Rail exit speed: 52 ft/s • Final altitude: 5,287 ft AGL • Depends on wind conditions • Can be adjusted by changing the rocket’s weight

  14. Motor Safety Verification and Testing • Static fire tests • Static fire tests on the ground to determine the effectiveness and safety of the payload • Build upon last year’s static fire data regarding, e.g., the Krushnic effect • Use J90 and J99 motors for testing • Monitored by safety officer Robin Midgett • Test launches • Ensure that the rockets (full scale and subscale) have been constructed safely and that the selected motors are sufficient Motor static fire stand

  15. Vehicle Recovery • Dual deployment controlled by redundant MAWD altimeters • Separation occurs: • at the nosecone joint • at the joint between the body tubes • Rocket descends as one unit • Parachutes • Main parachute • 144” dia. = 18 ft/s descent • Housed in nosecone • Drogue parachute • 60” dia. = 65 ft/s descent • Housed in the forward body tube, aft of the avionics bay

  16. Vehicle Recovery • Electronics • Two-way redundancy • Identical MAWD systems • Completely isolated from each other • Each fires its own set of ejection charges and has its own batteries (2 x 9V each) • Housed in avionics bay, separate from all payload electronics • Avionics bay drilled with pressure sampling holes according to MAWD documentation • Avionics bay will be pressure isolated from the ejection charge blasts to mitigate false pressure readings

  17. Vehicle Recovery • Black powder charges • Sized according to equations referenced in PDR • 0.24g 4F black powder per 1” of pressurized chamber • Designed to effect 450 lbs of separation force • #6-32 nylon shear pins: 3 x 114 lbs = 342 lbs (max) needed for separation

  18. Vehicle Recovery • Ground testing • Entire deployment system will be ground tested • Remote-controlled firing of deployment charges • Ensure adequate charge sizing, shear pin selection • Performed under supervision from Safety Officer, with approval from Mechanical Engineering safety coordinator

  19. Scientific Payload Criteria

  20. Introduction • Immediate application: waste heat, airplane engines • Previous USLI Team demonstrated waste heat recovery as a function of rocket flight velocity • High vehicle velocity and low ambient temperature will lead to production of more power from TEGs

  21. Simulating Airplane Flight with Rocket Flight • Question posed by 2010-2011 Team • Simulation only depends on convective heat dissipation • Airplane • Flight Velocity • Favorable Ambient Conditions • Establish parity in rocket flight through cryogenic injection system • Thereby simulating airplane flight conditions with rocket flight ?

  22. Original Payload Design

  23. Theoretical Justification • 1D convective heat transfer model over a flat plate • Heat dissipation depends on Nusselt number • Laminar flow • Use cryogen to match ambient temperatures • Can make heat dissipation in two cases match

  24. Theoretical Results • Can establish parity with both C130 and B747 based on ambient temperature • Matches other plane conditions by manipulating cryogenic injection rate • Changing rocket (higher altitude, greater speed) also effective

  25. Proposed Payload Design • Design of a cryogenic injection system to lower ambient temperature • Will simulate airplane flight using rocket flight • Low cost, high fidelity alternative to airplane flight • Testing (while short) will provide valuable data • Show that TEG technology is beneficial in application Jet engines convert heat to work, but about 50% of energy is wasted.

  26. Validation of Payload • 2D experiments ground-based experiments • Measure power vs. temperature of single TEG • Varied wind speed • Inject cryogen into air stream for further cooling • Select new TIM to replace Arctic Silver • Problems breaking down at high temperatures

  27. Test Design TEG Assembly LN2 Injector Vasa Fan Heat Gun/Blowtorch Wind speeds up to 100 mph. Heat gun provides steady-state 120 C Blowtorch: 220 C Z X 3.3 Ω 3.3 Ω Y 3.3 Ω

  28. Results – Arctic Silver Heat Gun Results

  29. Results – Arctic Silver Blow Torch Results

  30. Results – TIM813HTC High Temperature Thermal Interface Material Results (Blow Torch)

  31. Conclusions • Power production improves with wind speed. • Power production improves with cooling [lower ambient temperature]. • We expect to achieve maximum theoretical power production for TEGs with cryogenic injection. • Results point to favorable usage in aerospace applications.

  32. Payload Design • 2 Payload Sections • Forward payload: Data Acquisition Electronics Cryogenic container, Valves and delivery lines • Aft payload: Thermoelectric engine with cryogen injectors

  33. Cryogen Storage Tank • Modified cryosurgery Dewar • Hand valve replaced with solenoid valve • Tank inverted and lines routed for filling and pressure relief

  34. Solenoid Valve • Compact solenoid valve rated for Liquid Nitrogen Use • Actuated by 24 volt direct current • ¼” NPT fittings

  35. Valve Control Electronics • Rocket Data Acquisition System (RDAS) igniter output activated by ‘g-switch’ • Pulse sent to 74121 ‘single shot’ IC • Relay sends 24 V DC to cryogen valve

  36. Aft Payload and Injection • Aft payload machined in-house from aluminum • Welded to motor retaining cap for rocket attachment • Injector constructed from slotted stainless steel, similar to 2-d experiments • 3 cooled TEGs and 3 control

  37. Data Acquisition • RDAS system activated by ‘g-switch’ • One data stream each for the cooled and control TEG sets • Hot and cold side temperature measurements • Power measurement across an impedance matched resistor network

  38. Payload Safety • Cryogen system design for filling on launch pad eliminating risk of exposure during assembly • G-switch failsafe to prevent accidental cryogen release • Aft payload proven secure through multiple full scale flight tests

  39. Payload Development • Cryogen system assembly and flow testing • 3-D ground based testing using rocket test stand • Scale cryogen system test using the 2009-2010 rocket

  40. Outreach Lesson PlanEnergy, Engines & Propulsion Thermal Energy Combustion & Propulsion Thermoelectric Energy Conversion

  41. Expose students in 5th to 12th grades to concepts of combustion, energy conversion and rocket propulsion • Build upon students’ prior scientific knowledge to identify new specific areas of interest • Provide opportunity for students to learn about mechanical and aeronautical engineering concepts, potentially leading to study in or careers in these fields Educational Engagement Mission

  42. Educational Engagement Timeline (All visits occur in Nashville, TN)

  43. Adiabatic Compression • This lesson will be presented to students in the 5th-8th grade range. • The demonstration will help the students understand the definition of an ‘adiabatic process’ and give a basic understanding of the Diesel engine combustion cycle. • The ground glass tube of the compressor is surrounded by plastic in the unlikely event that the glass tube breaks. • The power of adiabatic compression • Ignites paper for a dramatic demonstration

  44. Thermoelectric energy conversion

  45. Rocket Propulsion • An Estes D12-5 model rocket motor will be fixed in a test stand and its thrust will be measured by a Pasco PasPort Force Sensor. • The thrust and impulse terms will be explained to the students and the forces on a model rocket will be analyzed. • The Estes D12-5 motor will be secured inside the test stand using four set screws. thrust

  46. Summary • Rocket: • 10’-5” tall, 7.5” diameter, 64 lbs, dual deployment • Cesaroni Pro98 M520 provides 4.2 : 1 thrust-to-weight • Payload: • Cryogenic injection system • Aft-mounted thermoelectric engine • Outreach: • Developed curriculum and have begun planning educational engagement events

  47. 2011 Project Introduction • Simulation of cruising airplane flight conditions through low-altitude rocket flight • Use of cryogenic injection to establish ambient flight parity

  48. Questions

More Related