1 / 19

MBTI: Personality Affecting Performance

MBTI: Personality Affecting Performance. Jill Middleton & Ron Brassell. Overview. History MBTI Relation to Five-Factor Model Life Satisfaction Manager Preferences Application Ethical Use Reliability & Validity Limitations & Criticisms. History.

dragon
Download Presentation

MBTI: Personality Affecting Performance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MBTI: Personality Affecting Performance Jill Middleton & Ron Brassell

  2. Overview • History • MBTI • Relation to Five-Factor Model • Life Satisfaction • Manager Preferences • Application • Ethical Use • Reliability & Validity • Limitations & Criticisms

  3. History • Based on Carl Jung’s ideas about perception and judgment and personality typing • Isabel Briggs Myers and Katharine Briggs developed an “indicator” for people to describe themselves in Jung’s model • Assumes that people have preferred methods of perceiving the world, making judgments, forming attitudes to reflect their orientation of energy, and their orientation towards others.

  4. MBTI • Purpose: Identify people’s basic preferences pertaining to perception and judgment, through self-report of easily identifiable reactions • Different versions ranging from 96 – 290 forced choice questions • Assumes our personality can be broken down into four independent bi-polar scales • Energizing: Extroversion – Introversion • Attending: Sensing – Intuition • Deciding: Thinking – Feeling • Living: Judgment – Perception • 16 possible personality types

  5. MBTI • Energizing • Extroversion: Seeks engagement with the environment and gives weight to events in the surrounding world • Introversion: Seeks engagement from one’s internal thoughts and feelings, and gives weight to concepts and ideas • Attending • Sensing: Interested in facts, what is real, observable, and practical • Intuition: Interested in imagination, future possibilities, and implicit meanings

  6. MBTI • Deciding • Thinking: Make rational decisions through objective and logical analysis (cause/effect) • Feeling: Make rational decisions by weighing personal values of alternatives • Living • Judgment: Prefer moving quickly toward decisions, organization, planning, and structure • Perception: Prefer spontaneous decisions and open to changes

  7. MBTI • You are almost never late for your appointments. Y N • You enjoy having a wide circle of acquaintances. Y N • Strict observance of the established rules is Y N likely to prevent a good outcome. • You trust reason rather than feelings. Y N • You spend your leisure time actively socializing Y N with a group of people, attending parties, shopping, etc. • You usually plan your actions in advance. Y N • Your actions are frequently influenced by emotions. Y N • You are a person somewhat reserved and distant in Y N communication.

  8. Relation to Five-Factor Model • McCrae & Costa • Intuition – Openness to Experience Sensing – More closed • Feeling – Agreeable Thinking – Antagonistic • Judging – High in Conscientiousness Perception – Low in Conscientiousness • Five-Factor model, which is based on multiple theoretical perspectives, may be a better perspective for interpreting the MBTI • Jung’s theory: construct validation problems • 5-Factor: each of the four indices showed strong evidence of convergence with 1 of the 5 personality dimensions

  9. Relation to Five-Factor Model • Jung’s Theory: • Thinking: intellectual activity in which judgments are based on rational applications of principles • Feeling: assignment of value (acceptance or rejection) to objects of experience • A person whose first reaction to experiences is a judgment of rejection (e.g., mistrust) but without a logical basis would be classified as a Feeling type by Jung, but would probably score low on the MBTI Feeling preference. • Jung’s Thinking/Feeling preferences focus on different modes of experience and might be more related to aspects of Openness.

  10. Life Satisfaction • Es – higher psychological well-being and life satisfaction than Is • Ns – higher psychological well-being than Ss • Ns prefer to see things as they could be rather than as they are. • Ss – higher social anxiety than Ns • Ss prefer predictability and demonstrated commitment in relationships • Overall, Es, Ns, and Ss reported higher levels of psychological well-being than their counterparts.

  11. Manager Preferences • Thinking and Judgment are most common among managers • Implies that certain types of people self-select for administrative positions • Top managers are predominantly Intuitive. • Middle and lower managers are predominantly Sensing. • Suggest Intuitive managers engage in strategic planning more frequently and effectively than Sensing managers.

  12. Application of the MBTI • Career Counseling • Teaching • Group Dynamics • Training • Marketing • Personal Development • Executive Coaching • Learn to Type-Watch coworkers

  13. Ethical Considerations of the MBTI • Voluntary basis only • Confidentiality • Indicates types not traits • Never for selection of employees. • Strengths and weaknesses vary with the shadow functions, people can change, learn and adapt. • Never humiliate others in a negative way. • There are no right and wrong answers to the test. • Proper feedback should be given.

  14. Reliability • Test/retest results show variations in the reported type, depending on the number of months between testing. • 50% of participants remain the same within 9 months of testing. • Low reliability on children and the elderly. • Lacks falsifiability and can lead to confirmation bias.

  15. Validity • Lacks scientific scrutiny • Prone to socially desirable responses • Vulnerable to faked responses. • Lacks double-blind testing for validity • Factor Analysis shows 6 factors instead of 4 • JP and SN scales have been shown to correlate with each other.

  16. Limitations • Values and motivations are not measured. • Pathology is not measured. • Sane and insane can have the same dimensions. • The dimensions are not measured. • How competently do you feel, think or judge. • Forced choice prohibits the shadow functions. • Can cause stereotypes to be misplaced and misunderstood.

  17. Criticisms of the MBTI • Jung’s theory of psychological type were not tested through scientific studies. • Modern psychology rejects the base components of introspection and anecdotal thoughts. • Neither Myers-Briggs nor Jung supported their theories with proof of existence, sequence, orientation or manifestation. • CPP Corp suspected of “protecting” the MBTI.

  18. Questions?

More Related