360 likes | 467 Views
Evolution of a Dynamic Theory of Collaboration : Modeling Intergovernmental Use of Information Technology Pre pared for the 2002 System Dynamics Research Conference, Palermo, Italy Presented at the Conference by: Dr. David F. Andersen Ignacio J. Martínez-Moyano.
E N D
Evolution of a Dynamic Theory of Collaboration:Modeling Intergovernmental Use ofInformation TechnologyPrepared for the 2002 System Dynamics Research Conference, Palermo, ItalyPresented at the Conference by:Dr. David F. AndersenIgnacio J. Martínez-Moyano Center for Technology in Government / Rockefeller College University at Albany July 2002
Contents • Where we’ve been: Project history and critical theoretical problems • Where we are: Approaching solutions • Where we might go: Toward a dynamic theory of collaborative IT
Where We’ve Been:Project History and Some Problems withRepresentation and Theory
Motivation • Interorganizational partnerships are widely recognized as a powerful strategy to improve public sector initiatives in order to significantly increase the quality of their services. • Information Technology plays a key role in this partnerships.
Motivation • Researchers at the Center of Technology in Government have studied knowledge and information sharing in interorganizational networks in the Public Sector for years. • Their analyses have provided evidence of the existence of feedback processes influencing collaboration and knowledge sharing. • A dynamic theory of collaboration could be a powerful instrument to improve success in IT intensive projects.
Motivation • The creation of better understanding and better models of interorganizational dynamics.
Knowledge-Based Trust 1 Trust1 Collaboration 2 Collaboration 1 2 Modeling Sessions Modeling Work March 2002 June 2002 January 2001 Time Line
Problems • Trust1 has no trust • An infectious theory of collaboration? • Collaboration 1 has no collaboration • Collaboration 2 is a single-actor collaboration model (a half-collaboration model?) • Conceptual blurring
Critical Theoretical Problems • 1-party, 2-party, multi-party focus • Multiple stages of IT development and scale-up issues • Understanding / specification discovery • Prototype construction • Production system implementation • Dependence on highly abstract variables • What drives changes to TRUST and ENGAGEMENT? What do they do?
Where We Are (*) We are about here * Diagram taken from: Randers, J., Ed. (1980). Elements of the System Dynamics Method. Cambridge MA, Productivity Press.
Potential Contributions • Theoretical • Explore scale-up issues in phases of IT work • Explore differences and similarities in interagency and intergovernmental IT work • Practical • Develop a cross-project comparison tool • Use model scenarios as training
The 3 Models (summary) • Trust 1 • Centered in Project Dynamics and how these influence trust and collaboration. • Collaboration 2 • Centered around the interaction dynamics of HIMS team members and how these influence trust and collaboration. • Knowledge-Based Trust 1 • Centered around the dynamics generated by the use of facilitative tools and methods in the collaborative effort and how these influence trust and collaboration.
The Products Generated • International Conference of the System Dynamics Society • 19th Atlanta 2000 • A Preliminary System Dynamics Model of Intergovernmental Collaboration • Group Modeling of IT-Based Innovations in the Public Sector • 20th Palermo 2001 • Evolution of a Dynamic Theory of Collaboration: Modeling Intergovernmental Use of Information Technology • Hawaiian International Conference on Systems Sciences • HICSS 35 2001 • Modeling Intergovernmental Collaboration: A System Dynamics Approach • HICSS 36 2002 • A Dynamic Theory of Collaboration: A Structural Approach to Facilitating Intergovernmental Use of Information Technology