690 likes | 805 Views
Philip W. Madson President. MAKING THE CASE. for. GENERATION 1.5. RFS 2 - USA. 2012 Plan – 500MM GPY (cellulose) 2012 Revised – <13MM GPY 2012 Reality – ????. 97% Shortfall!!. HEADLINES Generation 2 Bioethanol. API sues US Government
E N D
MAKING THE CASE • for GENERATION 1.5
RFS 2 - USA • 2012 Plan – 500MM GPY (cellulose) • 2012 Revised – <13MM GPY • 2012 Reality – ???? 97% Shortfall!!
HEADLINESGeneration 2 Bioethanol • API sues US Government • “EPA’s standard is divorced from reality. There is a complete lack of commercial supply of the [cellulosic] fuel.” • USDA: 527 Biorefineries Needed Cost of $168 Billion (< $50 billion invested worldwide, Gen 1 - 30 years)
The Path From Science to Commercial Success is Tortuous
Science Technology Commercial Success Commercial Demonstration
Where were we in 1982? Science Technology Commercial Success Commercial Demonstration
Where are we today? Science Technology Commercial Success Commercial Demonstration
BIOETHANOL SUGAR STARCH CELLULOSE FEEDSTOCK COST TECHNICAL COMPLEXITY
The Rational Farmer Model Under the RFS The farmer’s choice – allocate acres to maximize profit at acceptable risk among the three major crops: corn, soybeans, switchgrass Source: Iowa State University
Results of Study (economic equilibrium at full RFS) Market Price Ethanol Subsidy Corn Soybeans Switchgrass $4.76/bu $13.01/bu $164/ton $0.51/gal --- $1.86/gal Note: 20% of crop acres required for switchgrass Source: Iowa State University
HEADLINESGeneration 2 Bioethanol • Purdue U. – farmers need $100+/dry ton (cobs) • U. Illinois – biomass projected $140/ton • Iowa State U. – switchgrass > $113/ton • Kans. State U. – “Using crop residue for cellulosic ethanol hurts future yields.”
Cellulosic Ethanol Grain Ethanol
Cellulosic Ethanol Grain Ethanol
Generation 1Bioethanol The Success • Grain/sugar ethanol technology has experienced extraordinary advances because of commercial operation (business profit motive) • 50% real investment reduction in less than 3 decades
Generation 2Bioethanol The Reality • R&D alone do not foster investment reduction. Commercial experience creates the motives. • No real investment reduction for 3 decades
GENERATION 1.5 New Paradigm?
DEFININGGENERATION 1.5 • Gen 1: sugar, starch (conventional) • Commercial technology (financeable) • Gen 2: Lignocellulose • Technology not commercial
DEFININGGENERATION 1.5 • Gen 1: sugar, starch (conventional) • Commercial technology (financeable) • Gen 1.5: sugar, starch (new sources) • Existing technology / integrations • Gen 2: Lignocellulose • Technology not commercial
GENERATION 1.5 • SMALL GRAINS AS FEEDSTOCK • AGRICULTURAL INTEGRATION • ADVANCED FEEDSTOCKS
MULTIPLE FEEDSTOCKS • WHEAT • BARLEY • CORN • MILO • TRITICALE • SUGARS
HUSKY ENERGY Minnedosa, Manitoba Lloydminster, Saskatchewan
WHEAT, BARLEY, AND OTHER GRAINS YIELD PROPORTIONAL TO STARCH CONTENT
LIVESTOCK THE PARTNER TO GRAIN ETHANOL
INTEGRATED AGRICULTURE FOOD, FEED, FUEL
Ethanol Plant Ethanol(Fuel Grade) DDG Export (Dried Distillers Grain) W D G (Wet Distillers Grain) Anaerobic Digester Nitrogen BioFertilizers as N-P-K Electricity and boiler Water Renewable "Green" Grid Electricity Dairy Facility Beef Facility Beef Milk Steam and Electricity Waste and solubles Internal Animal Feeds Waste Waste
REEVE AGRI-ENERGY
AGRICULTURAL INTEGRATION Superb Business Model
TYPICAL BUSINESS MODEL TODAY
LET “MOTHER NATURE” HELP
“High Cellulose” “High Starch” “Wild Maize” “Corn” “Energy Corn”
Biomass Fuel ENERGY CORN
“High Protein” “High Starch” “Wild Wheat” “Wheat” “Energy Wheat”