1 / 11

St. Anthony Falls Bridge Replacement Project Project Letting Sept. 19, 2007 3:00 PM

Learn about the St. Anthony Falls Bridge Replacement Project, including early milestones, the technical evaluation process, and the best value selection process. Discover how the procurement process unfolded and key criteria used for the selection. Find insights into the project timeline and construction expectations.

dstrother
Download Presentation

St. Anthony Falls Bridge Replacement Project Project Letting Sept. 19, 2007 3:00 PM

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. St. Anthony Falls Bridge Replacement ProjectProject Letting Sept. 19, 20073:00 PM

  2. Presentation Outline • Early Milestones • Technical Evaluation Process • Best Value Selection Process

  3. Early Milestones • August 1 – Bridge Collapses • August 4 – Issue Request for Qualifications • August 8 – Short Listed teams • August 23 – Request For Proposals released • September 14 – Technical Proposals received • September 18 – Financial Proposals received • September 19 – Project letting • Between September 19 and October 15 • Contract finalized • October 15 – Construction expected to begin

  4. Procurement process • Today’s letting is a step in process • Contract must be executed before process is final • Anticipate final contract in place by end of September 2007

  5. Technical Evaluation Process • Technical Review Committee • Six Members responsible for developing average Technical Proposal Score for each team • Minn. Statute, Section 161.3420, Subd 2 • Technical Advisors • Advise TRC with technical aspects of proposals • Coordinates Process

  6. Technical Evaluation Process • Process Oversight Committee • Observation and Verification of Process • Technical Subcommittees • Assist in identifying strengths and weaknesses of each team • Aesthetic/Visual Quality • Roadway/Geometrics • Communication • Quality and Structural • Legal Financial

  7. Evaluation Criteria • Quality (50%) • Experience and authority of key individuals • Extent of quality control/quality assurance • Safety • Measures to evaluate performance in construction • Aesthetics/Visual Quality (20%) • Enhancements (15%) • Geometric and structural enhancements • Public Outreach/Involvement (15%)

  8. Best Value Selection Process • Design Build A+B, Best Value formula • Three Components • “A” = Contract Bid Price • Plus “B” = Number of Days to Complete Project, which is multiplied by $200,000 per day • $200,000 per day based on 50% of road user costs • Divided by Technical Proposal Average Score (TPA) • Result = Adjusted Bid (A) + (B x $200,000) divided by TPA = Adjusted bid • Contract awarded to lowest adjusted bid

  9. Technical proposal scoring • Scores fall within these categories and ranges • Excellent – 100 - 91 percent • Very good – 90 - 76 percent • Good – 75 – 61 percent • Fair – 60 - 50 percent

  10. Data classification Minnesota Statutes Section 13.72, Subdivision 11

  11. Thank You:Ames/LundaC.S. McCrossanFlatiron-MansonWalsh Construction/American Bridge http://www.dot.state.mn.us/i35wbridge/

More Related