1 / 7

December 1, 2004

C ERCA DEL C LIENTE. NOBEL WP4 Questionnaire review Javier González Ordás. December 1, 2004. Telefónica I+D. Questionnaire motivation. Get a collective view across partners Prioritise issues and functional capabilities Guide WP4 further work

duane
Download Presentation

December 1, 2004

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CERCADEL CLIENTE NOBEL WP4 Questionnaire review Javier González Ordás December 1, 2004 Telefónica I+D

  2. Questionnaire motivation • Get a collective view across partners • Prioritise issues and functional capabilities • Guide WP4 further work • Align activities and focal points across task forces

  3. Questionnaire overview • Structured into reference points • UNI, E-NNI, NMI-A, UPI, PPI • 11 answers received • 7 from operators • 4 from equipment vendors • Partners filled the questionnaire in different manners • Overlapping topics • Discussion per reference point, not per capability • How to interpret a missing capability in an answer? • More answers in CP interfaces than in MP ones • In general, it is agreed that the CP focus should be • Short term: intracarrier. First E-NNI, then UNI. (I-NNI?) • Long term: intercarrier. First public UNI, then E-NNI

  4. Selected functional capabilities Importance Complexity Timing User authentication (UNI) High Med Mid Ethernet services (UNI) High Med- Short Service independence (UNI) Med Med+ Mid Service modification (UNI, E-NNI) Med+ Low Short VPN services (UNI, E-NNI, NMI-A) Med+ Med Mid+ Multi-layer networks (E-NNI) Med High Mid Information model (NMI-A) High Med+ Short

  5. Conclusions (I) • Need for uniform answers to better draw conclusions • New questionnaire on selected topics? • Higher interest on CP than on MP issues • Only information modelling received significatnt support on the MP side • Similar interest on UNI and E-NNI • Intra-carrier interface, the first priority in both cases • Low correlation between importance and timing • What should be NOBEL focus? • Work on capabilities covered by OIF UNI 2.0?

  6. Conclusions (II) • Consensus on user authentication as a key aspect • But is this really an innovative topic for NOBEL? • Ethernet and NG-SDH, both important and short term • VPN services are interesting • … but not in the shor term • Multi-layer networking received much attention • No agreement though on its real value • Importance of service independence was not valued especially high

More Related