330 likes | 487 Views
The Limits of Humanitarian Intervention from the Air: Bosnia. Contents. Historical Background (i) Pre-Bosnian War (ii) Bosnian War Failures of the International Community Threshold Conditions Non-Threshold Conditions Bosnia Today. Background to the Bosnian War.
E N D
The Limits of Humanitarian Intervention from the Air: Bosnia
Contents • Historical Background (i) Pre-Bosnian War (ii) Bosnian War • Failures of the International Community • Threshold Conditions • Non-Threshold Conditions • Bosnia Today
Background to the Bosnian War • Social Federal Republic of Yugoslavia - 6 republics. • Bosnia: Muslims 44 percent, Serbs 31 percent, Croats 18 percent, remainder mixed. • Federation held together by Tito till his death in 1980.
Key Tipping Points • Election of Slobodan Milosevic in Serbia Milosevic and his idea of a Greater Serbia. Taking over control of Serbia, Montenegro, Kosovo and Vojvodina.
Key Tipping Points • Rise of Nationalism in other Republics. Election of nationalist Franjo Tudjman in Croatia. Collapse of the Yugoslav Communist Party. Slovenia and Croatia declared independence in mid 1991.
Key Tipping Points • Serbia-Croatia war Serbian Autonomous Region of Krajina. Arms embargo (Resolution 713) imposed in the hope of preventing Croatian conflict from widening.
Key Tipping Points • Breakdown of relations in Bosnia Bosnian Serbs left assembly in late 1991, which later voted for sovereignty, declaring their own republic. Referendum of Feb 29 and Mar 1 1992. Start of violence.
Bosnian War: 1992-1995 • A lesson in preventive deployment of a sufficient amount of force (less costly) • Combatants: Serbs: Army of Republika Srpska Croats: Croatian Defense Council Bosniaks: Army of Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina Various paramilitaries & the UN (airstrikes) • Dayton and the belief in the efficacy of the air campaign ~ the Kosovo debacle
minimum number of persons killed in the Bosnian war, by ethnicity, status as of mid-2003
Action by the international community • UNHCR • Extension of UNPROFOR mandate • Peace plans (4) Means of intervention: Humanitarian aid for besieged towns and cities, armed escorts for humanitarian aid convoys & air campaign
Key tipping points UN resolutions • Resolution 770 (13 Aug 1992) Provision of armed escorts for aid convoys “use all necessary means” to deliver humanitarian aid • Resolution 819 (16 Apr 1993) Application of “safe areas policy” Declaration of Srebrenica as safe zone • Resolution 824 (May 1993) Additions to list of safe areas
Incidents • Discovery of Serb detention centre for Muslim prisoners by media outlets (Aug 1992) Image of the Western governments at stake • BS attacks on Srebrenica (1993) Heavy shelling & heavy civilian casualties Refusal of access to aid convoys • Collapse of ceasefire (May 1993) • Sarajevo (Aug 1995) BS attack that killed 37 → intensification of air campaign • Srebrenica
Resolution 836 (4 June 1993) Authorization of the use of air support • Extension of UNPROFOR’s mandate “to deter attacks against safe areas” • Empowerment of UNPROFOR “acting in self-defence, to take necessary measures, including the use of force, in reply to bombardments against the safe areas… armed incursion” PROBLEM: interpretation of this resolution
Incidents • Sarajevo (Aug 1995) BS attack that killed 37 → intensification of air campaign • Operation Deliberate Force Air campaign stemming from 3 massacres (e.g. 7141 Muslim males in Srebrenica) • Operation Storm Shift in BOP on the ground
Peace plans • Vance Owen plan (Jan 1993) – stimulation of ethnic cleansing • Partitioning of Bosnia (10 semi-autonomous regions), awarding of territories to the groups in control of each area at that point in time • Broke Muslim-Croat alliance & renewed competition over the territories • Weakened military resistance to the Serbs E.g. area between Vitez and Kiseljak
Failures of the international community • Misinterpretation of the nature of the conflict. Mary Kaldor: defining character of the war was that the violence 'was directed not against opposing sides, but against civilian populations' • Justification for the refusal to commit since outsiders could do little • Lack of protection for the Serb civilians targeted by the Bosniaks and Croats
Western recognition of the sovereignty of Bosnia encouraged Bosniaks to push for independence • Lack of commitment and in turn, decisive action or troop numbers required for the efficacy of the intervention • Use of an air campaign
Lack of viability of the safe areas • safe areas turned into permanent refugee camps, contrary to the Vance Owen plan e.g. the '93 'open jail' of Srebrenica & '95 massacre • boxing up of the largest ethnic group into the smallest area
What could've been done • Lifting of the arms embargo from the start Fear of escalation from 'leveling the killing field' • UN trusteeship BUT huge financial assistance and personnel to rebuild industries and the political and legal system • 1992: international protectorate BUT necessity of long term policing role which ultimately was realized with the IFOR and SFOR postwar
Supreme humanitarian emergency? • Ethnic cleansing • Arms embargo → Muslims & Croats defenceless & could not be relied upon to end violations • Refugees and casualties By fall of 1992, almost 2 million refugees (approx half of Bosnia`s population) By 1994, est 150,000 killed, 150,000 wounded.
Last resort? • Measures already taken: Sanctions that called for U.N. members to freeze Serbian assets abroad etc Undermined by deliveries of supplies which came overland from Greece and up the Danube from Russia & Ukraine. Arms Embargo
Proportionality? • One of the largest UN operations at that time. • Slowed down war machine • Failure to protect safe areas and emboldened Muslim and Croat militias
Proportionality • Benjamin Valentino. • No `low-cost` intervention. • Evaluating intervention in terms of dollars per life saved?
Positive humanitarian outcome? • Prevented starvation. • Did airstrikes contribute towards the Dayton accords? • Misunderstanding of conflict leading to unrealistic expectations of humanitarian outcomes e.g. failure to protect Serbs as well.
Humanitarian motives? Various purposes of the intervention: Recognition of Bosnia --> Internationalisation of the problem would deter Serbian interference To ensure the safety of the humanitarian aid convoys & safeguard the safe areas Maintain the image of the Western governments involved (instrumental prudential concerns) Issue of misinformation: Safe areas identified solely for Muslims
Humanitarian justifications? UN resolutions Legality? Security Council authorization Selectivity? Intervention as part of a larger regional commitment to stabilise the former Yugoslav republic
Bosnia Today • Under Dayton Accords, Bosnia structured as confederation comprising of 2 entities, autonomous Serb Republic and a Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Bosnia Today • Return of refugees. Approx half of wartime refugees considered to have returned. BUT........ • Improved climate security and diminishing presence of peacekeeping forces. • Gradual coordination of the 2 entities of Bosnia.