230 likes | 539 Views
Officer Safety Law. Carl Milazzo Legal Division Federal Law Enforcement Training Center cmilazzo@fletc.treas.gov. No Handout. Presentation Available at: www.khodges.com/iacp. INTRODUCTION. Knowing the Law Enhances Your Tactical Training BECAUSE Ignorance Causes Hesitation.
E N D
Officer SafetyLaw Carl Milazzo Legal Division Federal Law Enforcement Training Center cmilazzo@fletc.treas.gov
No Handout Presentation Available at: www.khodges.com/iacp
INTRODUCTION Knowing the Law Enhances Your Tactical Training BECAUSE Ignorance Causes Hesitation
“Officer Safety” Is Not a Reason… It Is a Conclusion
Therefore – Facts Become More Important Than Law
BRD C & C PC RS Conviction Admin Arrest Search Stop Frisk Standard of Proof OR OR Voluntary Encounters
Training Theories • Integrated Training Legal AND Tactical • Practical Exercises Field Application Report Writing - Testimony
Dangerous Encounters • People (Chimel) • Vehicles (Belton) • Premises (Buie)
Defined: 1. Pat Down 2. Outer Clothing 3. Weapons Factors: type of crime know that suspect is armed or dangerous behavior of suspect prior history known to officer Investigative DetentionFrisk with Reasonable Suspicion
Handcuffs Handcuffs = Safety Handcuffs Do Not Convert an Investigative Detention Into an Arrest
“Seizure” under the Fourth Amendment “Not Free to Leave” does not mean “under arrest” or “in custody” Suspect “Seized” When He Submits to: Show of Authority Physical Force All Vehicle Stops are Seizures “Custody” under the Fifth Amendment Arrest or Functional Equivalent Handcuffed and locked in patrol car Telling the suspect he is under arrest Advise suspect he is not under arrest Asking Questions During an Investigative Detention
Public Safety Exception Limited to Weapons Only Good Until Threat Ends
Premises (Chimel) Justification Weapons Evidence Timing Vehicles (Belton) Any Occupant Any Crime Passenger Area NOT THE TRUNK Search Incident to CUSTODIAL Arrest
Vehicle Stops 1. Order Driver Out(Mimms) 2. Order Passenger Out(Wilson) 3. Car Frisk (Long)
DriversPennsylvania v. Mimms Officers May Automatically Order Drivers to Exit Lawfully Stopped Vehicles 1. Risk of Assault 2. Risk of Passing Traffic
PassengersMaryland v. Wilson Officers May Automatically Remove Passengers From Lawfully Stopped Vehicle Court Cited Same Concerns, Noting Passengers May Increase Danger
Car FriskMichigan v. Long 1. Passenger Compartment 2. Weapons 3. Reasonable Suspicion Automatic For Every Vehicle Stop NOT
Car Frisk Frisk Instead of Search…So: • Reasonable Suspicion, NOT PC • Look for Weapons, NOT Evidence • Where Weapons May be Hidden (no pill bottles or film containers) NOT The Trunk!
Conclusion • Common Theme: Weapons and Reasonable Suspicion • Lower Standard Needed for Self-Protection, BUT • Obligation to Identify Facts to Justify Conduct
No Handout Presentation Available at: www.khodges.com/iacp
Randy MeansThomas and Means (702) 450-3705 (NV) (704) 948-5608 x13 (NC) rbmeans@aol.com