1 / 27

Presentation to UC/CSU Energy Managers

Presentation to UC/CSU Energy Managers. Sunday, August 31, 2014. Energy Division California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). Energy Efficiency Organizational Chart. Why am I here today?. Eric invited me to speak to you about Rolling Portfolio Cycle Water Energy EM&V

dudley
Download Presentation

Presentation to UC/CSU Energy Managers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Presentation to UC/CSU Energy Managers Sunday, August 31, 2014 Energy Division California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC)

  2. Energy Efficiency Organizational Chart

  3. Why am I here today? • Eric invited me to speak to you about • Rolling Portfolio Cycle • Water Energy • EM&V • But then he sent me your questions…

  4. Why Invest in Energy Efficiency? • It saves you money • It can help mitigate climate change Let’s imagine a future where…

  5. So where does energy efficiency fit it? Source: California Air Resources Board Scoping Plan, December 2008, Table 2.

  6. What are the Energy Efficiency accomplishments? Average household assumed to use 9600 kWh/yr; Major power plant defined to be 400MW or greater Source: 2009 Energy Efficiency Evaluation Reports

  7. The gap between U.S. and CA energy use can be partially attributed to EE.

  8. The gap between U.S. and CA energy use can be partially attributed to Energy Efficiency

  9. CPUC policy emphasis focused on voluntary market Historical Agency Emphasis / Mandates Example IOU Programs

  10. Ratepayer-funded EE programs have provided a Commission-estimated $1.8 billion of net benefits (TRC) over the past 9 years. Source: Table 2, page viii, 2006-2008 Evaluation report: ftp://ftp.cpuc.ca.gov/gopher-data/energy%20efficiency/2006-2008%20Energy%20Efficiency%20Evaluation%20Report%20-%20ES.pdf Table 2, page 4, 2009 Evaluation Report: http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/NR/rdonlyres/D66CCF63-5786-49C7-B250-00675D91953C/0/EEEvaluationReportforthe2009BFPeriod.pdf proxy estimates from D.09-09-047, page 4, page 71 (Table 4) proxy estimates from D.12-11-015, page 100 and 103, ex ante 13-14 compliance tool

  11. Ex Ante and Ex Post Policy Framework

  12. Impact Evaluation Objective Verify energy savings via field research

  13. Ex Ante Review Custom Projects Site-specific; Values developed at completion Non-DEER Workpapers Measures not in DEER Sub-selection of submission Ex Ante Values Best available information and extrapolation DEER methodology DEER Common EE measures; Savings estimates and parameters

  14. DEER (Database for Energy Efficient Resources)

  15. Custom Projects Review

  16. Strategic Plan IOU Portfolios State Agencies Big Bold Energy Efficiency Strategies Action Plans Champions Network Foundation Grants

  17. Actions Plans Developed / Underway

  18. 2013 EE Incentives and Gross Savings by Sector Source: 2013 IOUs Compliance Filings

  19. 2013-14 EE Portfolio Organization Source: 2013 IOUs Compliance Filings

  20. Codes & Standards Program Analysis /Support activities Principal audience is CEC’s building and appliance standards. Also influences federal appliance standards via DOE proceedings and the legislative process Major program activities: Codes and Standards Enhancement (CASE) studies Compliance Enhancement “Reach Codes” Planning and Coordination 22% of planned electric savings, 25% of gas savings, and 1% of portfolio budget* *Savings based on 2010-2012 cycle, non-verified.

  21. Shareholder Incentive Payments

  22. Energy Efficiency Rulemaking • Phase 1: 2015 Funding, with targeted changes • Prop 39 Support • Locational targeting to enhance grid reliability • Drought response • Phase 2: “Rolling Portfolio Cycles” • Phase 3: Broader portfolio changes for 2016+ and Strategic Plan update

  23. CPUC Process for Approval / Oversight of IOU EE Programs Current 2-3 year Budget Cycle Process: *Phase II of R.13-11-005 will consider moving away from the 2-3 year cycle to a Rolling Portfolio framework

  24. Rolling Portfolio Cycle • Stakeholder effort underway to determine the framework. Proposal will be submitted to the proceeding when Phase II launches • The Joint Stakeholders believe that long-term energy efficiency funding authorization will: • create market stability, • sustain momentum and performance of successful programs, • improve ability to “count” efficiency for resource planning, and • enable the “delinking” of the contracting process from regulatory schedules.

  25. Water Energy Nexus • There are two distinctly different types of water impacts on the energy sector: • Energy Use by the Water Sector • Energy Use by Water Customers • The energy IOUs are currently piloting projects to reduce embedded energy in water

  26. Water Energy Programs

  27. Thank YouJaclyn Marks, SupervisorCPUC Energy DivisionEnergy Efficiency Agricultural/Industrial Programs and Portfolio Forecasting Sectionjm3@cpuc.ca.govMore information on the Water Energy Nexus:http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/PUC/energy/Energy+Efficiency/Water-Energy+Nexus+Programs.htm

More Related