1 / 21

California’s Master Plan: Today & Tomorrow

California’s Master Plan: Today & Tomorrow. Joint Committee on the Master Plan Chancellor Charles B. Reed December 7, 2009. Overview – The Master Plan. Is NOT broken It continues to be a solid framework for meeting the state’s needs

duena
Download Presentation

California’s Master Plan: Today & Tomorrow

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. California’s Master Plan: Today & Tomorrow Joint Committee on the Master Plan Chancellor Charles B. Reed December 7, 2009

  2. Overview – The Master Plan • Is NOT broken • It continues to be a solid framework for meeting the state’s needs • The plan reflects a partnership between higher education and the state • Key problems today • California has abandoned its commitment to higher education • Workforce needs require more, not less • It’s About Students • New approaches, improvements should be part of our work everyday

  3. Master Plan – The Right Stuff • A partnership with institutions and the state with three core principles • Access, Affordability and Quality • California did not become world’s eighth largest economy by accident • Master Plan & higher education investment the key • Good framework for us in moving forward – same principles; new approaches for the future

  4. Key Problem Today: Lack of Investment • Partnership broken with state • Access, quality and affordability cannot be promised if funding not there • Recovery and reinvestment critical for our future • Without funding there are few real choices: • Reduce enrollment • Raise fees • Reduce programs and student services

  5. $111.3 B $102.6 B $103.0 B $94.5 B State General Fund Revenue and CSU Percentage Share (in billions) $93.5 B $96.5 B State General Fund Revenue $92.9B $88.2 B $80.6 B $86.2 B $82.2 B $71.4 B $76.9 B DOF Projected Need $72.3 B $71.9 B $58.6 B 3.61% 3.69% 3.46% 3.25% 3.24% 3.33% 2.98% 3.13% 2.89% CSU % Share of State General Fund Revenue 2.73% 2.89% 2.80%

  6. $2.97 CSU General Fund Allocation (In Billions) $2.87 $2.79 $2.68 $2.62 $2.61 $2.49 $2.47 $2.45 $2.25 $2.35 $2.16 Level of 1998-99 Allocation 98 - 99 99 - 00 00 - 01 01 - 02 02 - 03 03 - 04 04 - 05 05 - 06 06 - 07 07 - 08 08 - 09 09 - 10 2008-09 and 2009-10 amounts do not include $717.5 million “retroactive” cut to 2008-09 appropriation, since this is offset by one-time federal funds.

  7. Resident FTES Enrollment Actual 357,222 353,915 CSU Enrollment Patterns and General Fund Allocation 340,394 342,893 (target) 321,602 316,243 317,202 301,975 307,954 $2.97 $2.87 270,548 $2.79 $2.68 277,891 263,238 $2.62 $2.61 $2.49 $2.47 $2.45 CSU General Fund Allocation In Billions $2.35 $2.25 $2.16 2008-09 and 2009-10 amounts do not include $717.5 million “retroactive” cut to 2008-09 appropriation, since this is offset by one-time federal funds. 98 - 99 99 - 00 00 - 01 01 - 02 02 - 03 03 - 04 04 - 05 05 - 06 06 - 07 07 - 08 08 - 09 09 - 10

  8. Declining State Support Force More Reliance on Student Fees (Constant 2009 Dollars) Note: One-time federal funds for 2009-10 not included.

  9. CSU’s Role in Meeting Workforce Needs • PPIC research clear – we need more college graduates not less • CSU plays a critical role • Produce over 92,000 graduates annually • 2 out of 3 CSU baccalaureate graduates transferred to CSU from a community college • Provide a breadth of degree options, program models

  10. Source: California Post-Secondary Education Commission

  11. Source: California Post-Secondary Education Commission *CIP Codes

  12. CSU Share of All Public and Private University Bachelor Degree Recipients in California, by Ethnicity, 2001-2002 Source: California Post-Secondary Education Commission

  13. Student Success Is Our Job • Segments responsible for delivering to students • Effectively and efficiently • Our focus has been on improving graduation rates • Increasing academic preparation of students • Creating equal opportunities for all Californians • Improving the community college transfer process • Identifying clear paths to degrees

  14. Student Preparation • Early Assessment Program • The CSU Center for Closing the Achievement Gap • Algebra Institutes

  15. Equal Opportunity • Parent Institute for Quality Education • Super Sundays • Road to College

  16. Clearer Paths to Success • Transfer Process • Student Advising & Support • Facilitate Graduation

  17. More Work To Be Done • Encouraging alternative ways to earn course credits • Use of high school senior year • New delivery modes and approaches • Examine four years or 120 units

  18. Graduation Rates for Successive Fall Cohorts of Freshmen

  19. Improving Graduation Rates • Campuses completing plans to achieve the following by 2014: • Achieve graduation rates in the top quartile of peer institutions starting with 2009 freshman class • Cut in half the current achievement gap for African American, American Indian, Latinos and Pacific Islander students

  20. Summary • No need to change the Master Plan • New innovative approaches might be warranted and worthy of exploration • Need the state’s full partnership to deliver on the promise • Funding for recovery and reinvestment • Support innovation and new approaches by the institutions to better serve students, state

  21. www.calstate.edu

More Related