1 / 12

Verification of AIXM 5 Terminal Procedure Model Study

This study investigates and verifies the AIXM 5 procedures model through cockpit simulation applications, including gap analysis, examination of AIP procedure data and NOTAM, and implementation of AIXM relational procedure DB. It also demonstrates approach channel visualization in cockpit display and visualization of temporary changes received in digital NOTAMs.

dukem
Download Presentation

Verification of AIXM 5 Terminal Procedure Model Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. AIXM 5 Terminal Procedure Model Study“Verification of the AIXM 5 Procedures Model through cockpit simulation applications“

  2. Objectives • Investigation and Verification • Gap analysis procedure model – real-world data • Examination of AIP procedure data and NOTAM • Implementation • AIXM relational procedure DB from UML model • Basic AIXM feeder interface • Demonstration • Approach channel visualization in cockpit display • Visualize (temporary) changes (received in digital NOTAMs) (A0711/06 NOTAMN Q) EYVL/QPICH/I /NBO/A /000/999/5438N02517E010 A) EYVI B) 0612210001 C) PERM E) 1. INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURE RWY 02 CHANGED AS FLW: - MNM ALT CHANGED TO 3500 FT INSTEAD OF 3000 FT, - FAP/FAF ALT(HGT) CHANGED TO 2500(1906) FT INSTEAD OF 2200(1606) FT. 2. INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURE RWY 20 CHANGED AS FLW: - MNM ALT CHANGED TO 3500 FT INSTEAD OF 3000 FT, - FAP/FAF ALT(HGT) CHANGED TO 2500(1854) FT INSTEAD OF 2200(1554) FT. REF AIP EYVI AD 2.4-37/42.)

  3. Procedures in European AIPs • Primary focus: non-graphical IAP information • Tabular/textual description of procedures • Examined the (e)AIPs of • Armenia, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Lithunia, Moldova, Netherlands, Slovenia • Only Netherlands publishes detailed description of legs (ARINC style) of some RNAV procedures

  4. Applying the Procedure Model <aixm:InitialLegTimeSlice> … <aixm:legTypeARINC>TF</aixm:legTypeARINC> <aixm:course>116</aixm:course> <aixm:courseType>MT</aixm:courseType> <aixm:courseDirection>TO</aixm:courseDirection> <aixm:length uom="NM">3.5</aixm:length> <aixm:lowerLimitAltitude uom="FT">2000</aixm:lowerLimitAltitude> <aixm:lowerLimitReference>ALT</aixm:lowerLimitReference> <aixm:altitudeInterpretation>LA</aixm:altitudeInterpretation> <aixm:startingAt> <aixm:TerminalSegmentPoint> <aixm:locatedAt_DesignatedPoint xlink:href="#LISDA"/> </aixm:TerminalSegmentPoint> </aixm:startingAt> <aixm:endingAt> <aixm:TerminalSegmentPoint> <aixm:locatedAt_DesignatedPoint xlink:href="#EH613"/> </aixm:TerminalSegmentPoint> </aixm:endingAt> <aixm:isPartOf_InstrumentApproachProcedure xlink:href="#EHAM_LISDA"/> </aixm:InitialLegTimeSlice>

  5. Procedure NOTAM Analysis • NOTAM set from EAD with NSC “P???” • Date Oct 20 2006, total number = 6731 • Most NOTAM (appr. 80%) simply change status • “…PROC NOT AVLB… EXPECT RADAR VECTOR…” • “…PROC CHANGED. REF AIP…” • Procedure NOTAM with “real” changes • OCA/OCH • Segment/Leg altitudes • Minima • Wrong NSC! • Very few with more complex content: (A0711/06 NOTAMN Q) EYVL/QPICH/I /NBO/A /000/999/5438N02517E010 A) EYVI B) 0612210001 C) PERM E) ILS AND NDB (GPS) APCH RWY 10 FROM ROBEL INT CHANGED AS FLW: LEAVE ROBEL AT 6000. WHEN CROSSING R274 ERF/ BRG 091DEG ERT (WP DE014) TURN RIGHT TO FINAL DESCENDING TO 5000. REST REMAINS UNCHANGED.)

  6. Procedure Data Availability • AIS procedure data is hard to find • Rarely any procedure data published in other form than charts • Rarely any NOTAM with “real” changes to procedures Why? • No generic procedure model available • NOTAM free text form inappropriate for redefining a procedure DUE VOR/DME SPL NOT AVBL, INSTR APCH PROC AND COM FAILURE PROC ALL RWY CHANGED: USE VOR/DME AMS INSTEAD OF VOR/DME SPL. COM FAILURE PROC RWY 09, 18R, 22 AND 36C: SUBSTITUTE FIXES ON OUTBOUND TRACKS BASED ON VOR/DME SPL BY FIXES BASED ON VOR/DME AMS WITH SAME BEARING AND DISTANCE. MISSED APCH PROC RWY 18R: AMEND DO NOT OVERSHOOT SPL 240 TO READ DO NOT OVERSHOOT AMS 240. CONTINUE MISSED APCH ON RDL AMS 280. MISSED APCH PROC RWY 36R: AMEND EH637 2.8 SPL TO READ EH637 3.8 AMS. MAINTAIN 1500FT, WHEN PASSING EH637 CLIMB TO 2000FT. MISSED APCH PROC RWY 18C: AMEND EH638 5.3 SPL TO READ EH638 5.4 AMS. MAINTAIN 1500FT, WHEN PASSING EH638 CLIMB TO 2000FT.

  7. Scenario – Temporary Restricted Airspace affects RNAV approach Frankfurt/Main (EDDF): RNAV (GPS) RWY 07L

  8. AIXM Processor • Process AIXM files • Integrate into DB AIP Procedure Data AIXM Procedure DB • PxP* • Pilot Procedure Selection • Proc Data Extraction • xNOTAM Functionality Procedure data (internal format) AIXM XML messages (digital NOTAM and others) AIXM Database and Display Application: Architecture MINIMUM ALTITUDE FROM LANUM ON R315 KLF TO 48.0 DME KLF TO READ 5000 *Procedure xNOTAM Processor

  9. digital NOTAM Baseline Delta Database Architecture and User Interaction • Database stores baseline and delta data • Baseline DB initially loaded with procedure data (from AIP) • Decoded digital NOTAMs are written to Delta DB • Choice between primary and temporary view Database

  10. Implementation of AIXM Procedure DB • Step 1: Strip down AIXM5 CM to necessary elements (classes, attributes, associations) • Step 2: Derive relational model from UML class model • Manual process, automatic processing with Rose Data Modeler did not yield satisfying results • Step 3: Implement relational model in DBMS • Choice was PostgreSQL due to its good spatial support • Manual creation of tables, attributes, keys

  11. Status / Next Steps • Implementing AIXM database and software • AIXM Processor • PxP • Display application digital NOTAM extensions • May 2007: Final Demonstration • Outcomes • AIXM Procedure Database implementation documentation • Procedure model investigation/verification report • Recommendations to improve AIXM support for Procedure NOTAMs • Cockpit simulation demonstration movie

  12. Questions?!

More Related