280 likes | 394 Views
Limno-Tech, Inc. Environmental Engineering. Review of Annex 1 of the GLWQA. March 21, 2001 Workshop Ann Arbor, Michigan. Prepared for: Parties Implementation Work Group Science Advisory Board, IJC. Outline. Objectives of Review Presentation of Approach and Findings Issues to Resolve.
E N D
Limno-Tech, Inc. Environmental Engineering Review of Annex 1 of the GLWQA March 21, 2001 Workshop Ann Arbor, Michigan Prepared for: Parties Implementation Work Group Science Advisory Board, IJC
Outline • Objectives of Review • Presentation of Approach and Findings • Issues to Resolve
Objectives of Review • Compile information on: • Status of the Great Lakes relative to chemicals listed in Annex 1 • Relationship of current policy values to Specific Objectives • Conceptual basis and rationale for current policy values • How each agency assesses compliance with their policy values for open waters of the Great Lakes
Caveat • Not exhaustive compilation of all data available • Data do not represent comprehensive spatial or temporal coverage • Data were assumed to meet QA/QC requirements • Did not interview every agency with a regulatory mandate in the Great Lakes • Comments related to key omissions are welcomed - Report is a draft
Annex 1 Specific Objectives I. Chemical • Persistent Toxic Substances • Organic • Inorganic • Non-Persistent Toxic Substances • Organic • Inorganic • Other Substances II. Physical III. Microbiological IV. Radiological
Comparison to Most Recent Field Data • Screening-level comparison of current (past 5 years) representative data • Selected data for open water only • Selected data that are representative and sufficient to make comparisons (=, <, >) • Contacted primarily federal agencies that monitor open waters • Obtained data for same media as objective (water, whole fish, edible fish)
Criteria for Selection of Data • Water • Data usually available for each lake from one source • Fish • Selected adult top predator species preferentially • Lake Trout (Lakes Superior, Michigan, Huron, Ontario) • Walleye (Lake Erie) • Selected skin-on-fillet data preferentially over dorsal plug data because generally more conservative in data sets examined
Primary Sources of Data • Water • U.S. EPA GLNPO • Environment Canada • Whole Body Fish Tissue • U.S. EPA GLNPO • Canadian DFO • State of Michigan • Edible Fish Tissue • U.S. EPA GLNPO • Ontario Sport Fish Contaminant Monitoring Program • State of Michigan
Pesticides < Objectives in all lakes (with few exceptions) Metals < Objectives in all lakes Not all parameters monitored in all lakes Results of Data Comparisons Water
Results of Data Comparisons Whole Fish • DDT+ in Lake MI > 1.0 ug/g (ww) • Mirex in Lake Ontario > DL • PCBs in all lakes > 0.1 ug/g (ww) • Mercury in all lakes < 0.5 ug/g (ww)
Results of Data Comparisons Edible Fish • Aldrin/Dieldrin < 0.3 ug/g (ww) • Heptachlor/Heptachlor Epoxide < 0.3 ug/g (ww) • Endrin < 0.3 ug/g (ww) • Lindane < 0.3 ug/g (ww)
Comparison to Current Policy Values • Definition of “policy value” - any criteria, standard guideline, or objective promulgated by agencies. • Policy values reflect: • Current knowledge base related to exposure and effects of contaminants in the environment • Interest in protecting human, aquatic, fish and wildlife use of water, sediment and tissue • Improvements in analytical methods since Annex 1
Policy Values for Water • Unspecified • Some Annex 1 Specific Objectives • For the protection of aquatic life • Some Annex 1 Specific Objectives • Canadian Water Quality Guidelines • Ontario Provincial Water Quality Objectives • U.S. EPA Water Quality Guidance (GLI) and States • For the protection of human health • GLI and States • For the protection of wildlife • GLI and States
Comparison of Policy Values for Water • Many inconsistencies between Objectives and policy values • Compared to policy values for protection of aquatic life, Objectives are often the lowest value • GLI criteria for protection of human health and wildlife usually lowest values overall • Some policy values for metals are hardness-dependent • Policy values have been promulgated for many substances not listed in Annex 1
Policy Values for Whole Fish • For the protection of wildlife consumers • Annex 1 Specific Objectives • DDT, Mirex, PCBs & mercury for protection of fish-consuming aquatic birds • Canadian Tissue Residue Guidelines • DDT, PCBs & Toxaphene for protection of wildlife consumers of aquatic biota • Ontario Fish Tissue Residue Criteria • DDT & mercury for protection of fish-consuming birds and in the case of mercury, aquatic life • GLI and States • Water criteria for protection of wildlife derived from fish tissue triggers for DDT, mercury, PCBs, 2,3,7,8-TCDD
Policy Values for Edible Fish Tissue • For the protection of human health • Annex 1 Specific Objectives for 5 pesticides • Uniform Sport Fish Consumption Advisory Protocol • PCBs • State trigger values, action levels or consumption guidelines • PCBs, pesticides, mercury, others • FDA Action Levels • PCBs, pesticides, mercury, others • GLI criteria for the protection of human health based on fish tissue triggers • PCBs, pesticides, mercury, others
Sediment Quality Policy Values • Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines • Ontario Provincial Sediment Quality Guidelines • U.S. EPA Draft Freshwater Sediment Quality Criteria • New York State Sediment Criteria
Procedures for Assessing Compliance • States and Ontario • Primarily focused on nearshore areas, efforts directed at effects of fish & sediment contamination • No systematic program to assess compliance in open waters • Federal Agencies • Environment Canada • Reviews data and flags parameters for which the 90th % value > most sensitive policy values in US & Canada • No formal reporting process • U.S. EPA • No systematic program currently in place
Issues to Resolve – Data Management • Method of averaging data that contain censored values • Monitoring programs to use for compliance assessment • Spatial and temporal reference of data to use for compliance assessment (potentially lake-specific) • Definition of open water • Time of year to sample • Number of stations • Variations in sampling and analytical protocols • Analytical method for water • Whole fish versus edible • Species of fish and size
Issues to Resolve - Policy • Use of both water and fish Objectives • Internal consistency (i.e., BAF) • Specification of fish “policy values” • Whole fish versus edible (ecosystem health versus human health) • Variation among agencies • Discrepancies between Annex 1 Objectives and Parties listing of parameters of concern • Parameters with “policy values”, but not listed in Annex 1 • Parameters listed in Annex 1 that are not monitored
Policy Values for Parameters Not Listed in Annex 1 • Additional parameters • Canadian Water Quality Guidelines • 44 additional organic substances or groups • 5 metals • 5 other inorganic substances or physical properties • GLI and States • 11 additional substances • Tier II option (some states)
Issues to Resolve – Policy • Conceptual basis for Objectives • Not specified for all parameters • Consistency with “policy values” • Variation among agencies • Consistency among Programs • Annex 1 Objectives • Lake-wide Management Plans (LaMPs) • Indicators in SOLEC process • Great Lakes Binational Toxics Strategy
Contact Information Joseph DePinto jdepinto@limno.com Wendy Larson wlarson@limno.com Penelope Moskus pmoskus@limno.com Limno-Tech, Inc. (LTI) 501 Avis Drive Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108 www.limno.com