150 likes | 305 Views
About a new model of fish size spectra, and fishing impacts. Eric Benoît, Université de La Rochelle Marie-Joëlle Rochet, IFREMER Nantes FRANCE. Pope and Knights, 1982. Qualitative prediction: fishing changes the slope of size spectra. r. Log(w). Continuous time-dependent models.
E N D
About a new model of fish size spectra, and fishing impacts Eric Benoît, Université de La Rochelle Marie-Joëlle Rochet, IFREMER Nantes FRANCE
Qualitative prediction: fishing changes the slope of size spectra
r Log(w) Continuous time-dependent models • Why should size spectra be linear? • needs allometric processes r=awb • How should fishing impact linear size spectra?
Allometric losses and generalised growthPlatt and Denmann, 1978
Predation, growth and mortalitySilvert and Platt (1980), Beyer (1989)
Balance Mortality Growth The equations x=ln(w)
Linear spectrum • There is a unique real l such thatis a solution of the model (linear spectrum) • l is not sensitive to the parameters’ values and is consistent with observed values
Simulating size spectra • Plankton input • Baseline « reasonable parameters » u Log(w)
How do perturbations affect the size spectrum? • Time step = 2 days • 3 years simulations • Oscillatory initial condition • Oscillatory plankton input • Stabilizing processes: fixing large predators / biodiversity / non-predation mortality a b
How does fishing impact the size spectrum? a high fishing mortality
How does fishing affect the size spectrum? • realistic fishing mortality • time step = 3 days • 10 years simulation • years 5-10 shown f
The impact of fishing on size spectra • If biomass flux driven by size-dependent predation: • Fishing decreases linearity • Slope • has less meaning • cannot be well estimated • is not a good indicator.