190 likes | 294 Views
Technological change and the Tragedy of the Commons: The Lofoten Fishery over Hundred and Thirty Years. Rögnvaldur Hannesson Kjell Salvanes Dale Squires. Period covered: 1860-1988 (open access ended in 1988) Fish stock data since 1900. The traditional product: fish dried in open air.
E N D
Technological change and the Tragedy of the Commons: The Lofoten Fishery over Hundred and Thirty Years Rögnvaldur Hannesson Kjell Salvanes Dale Squires
Period covered: 1860-1988 (open access ended in 1988) Fish stock data since 1900
Main issues • Productivity development 1860-1988 (last year of open access) • Puzzle: Labor productivity lagged behind agriculture & industry • Role of fish stock for productvity • Growth in TFP > growth in labor (or capital) productivity if role of stock taken into account • Open access dissipates gains from technical progess
Labor productivity (value) in the Lofoten fishery (9-years moving average) versus wages in agriculture and manufacturing
Labor productivity (annual and 9-years moving average) in the Lofoten fishery
Strong correlation stock-catch Also between boats and men—we can’t use both in a regression, with boats as proxies for capital
Production function: Fish migrations Y catch per year, E effort (boats or fishermen), S stock An instantaneous function not really appropriate for discrete time modeling, but the Lofoten fishery is seasonal (~3 months) with the fish migrating gradually to the area
Change in participation (no. boats) related to catch per fisherman lagged one year Use no. fishermen & catch per fisherman, both lagged one year, as instrumental variables Using catch value per fisherman gives poorer results than just catch per fisherman Could be because price depends on quantity
In 1938 fishermen got exclusive rights to sell raw fish. Seems to have stabilized prices (as intended).
Somewhat uneven technological progress, if even, we’d see d00 < d10 <…< d70 < 0 completed by the 1970s Note 0 < b < 1, 0 < a ~ 1
Growth rate of TFP: Estimates of a1 and a2 with panel data Set a1 = 0.65, a2 = 0.35
Average G based on 9-years moving average of TFP TFP growth > labor productivity growth Normal technological progress, diluted by decline in stock
Two possible reasons why TFP grows faster than LP: • Rising no fishermen per boat • Decline in fish stock
Major episodes: Raw fish marketing board 1938 Motorization 1905-20 Better technology & outside options after 1950 Low prices 1920s & 30s, technology reversion