250 likes | 271 Views
Surveillance and Broadcast Services. ASAS TN2 Workshop Glasgow, Scotland. By: Date: September 11-13, 2006. Rick Castaldo, Surveillance and Broadcast Services. Agenda. ATO Organization Program Charter / Governance Definition of Program Business Case Review Segment 1 Locations
E N D
Surveillance and Broadcast Services ASAS TN2 Workshop Glasgow, Scotland By: Date: September 11-13, 2006 Rick Castaldo, Surveillance and Broadcast Services
Agenda • ATO Organization • Program Charter / Governance • Definition of Program • Business Case Review • Segment 1 Locations • Acquisition Strategy • Safety Risk Management • Rulemaking • Summary
Vice President Vice President EnRoute and Oceanic EnRoute and Oceanic AJE AJE - - 0 0 Safety & Safety & Finance & Finance & En Route En Route Oceanic & Oceanic & En Route & En Route & Surveillance Surveillance Service Area Service Area Service Area Service Area Service Area Service Area Operations Operations Planning Planning Programs Programs Offshore Offshore Oceanic Oceanic and and Office for Office for Office for Office for Office for Office for Support Support Office Office Operations Operations Services Services Administration Administration Broadcast Broadcast Western Western Central Central Eastern Eastern Office Office Office Office Office Office Office Office Services Services En Route En Route En Route En Route En Route En Route Program Program Operations Operations Operations Operations Operations Operations Office Office AJE AJE - - 3 3 AJE AJE - - 4 4 AJE AJE - - 1 1 AJE AJE - - 2 2 AJE AJE - - 5 5 AJE AJE - - 6 6 AJE AJE - - W W AJE AJE - - C C AJE AJE - - E E SBS SBS Program Management Program Management Group Group SBS Policy, Rulemaking, SBS Systems Engineering Standards and Group Oversight Group SBS Implementation Group SBS Ops Support Group ATO-E Organization
Definition of Program: Automatic Dependant Surveillance - Broadcast (ADS-B) • Automatic • Periodically transmits information with no pilot or operator input required • Dependent • Position and velocity vector are derived from the Global Positioning System (GPS) or a Flight Management System (FMS) • Surveillance - • A method of determining position of aircraft, vehicles, or other asset • Broadcast • Transmitted information available to anyone with the appropriate receiving equipment
TIS-B is a service which provides ADS-B equipped aircraft with position reports from secondary surveillance radar on non-ADS-B equipped aircraft. FIS-B transmits graphical National Weather Service products, temporary flight restrictions (TFRs), and special use airspace. Definition of Program: Traffic Information Service - Broadcast / Flight Information Service - Broadcast
Reliable Precision Operations Improve Predictability, Safety and Airspace System Capacity
Program Objective • Develop a multi-segment, life cycle managed, performance based ADS-B strategy that aligns with the Next Generation Air Transportation System (NGATS) vision and generates value for the National Airspace System (NAS) • Integrate Concept of Operations for Portfolio of ADS-B Applications • Develop Application Life Cycle Management Approach • Portfolio Management for Applications • Requirements Management Across the Applications • Performance Criteria Management • Establish Infrastructure • Continuously Monitor Value and Adjust Investments
Definition of Program: Initial ADS-B Services and Applications (1) Merging and Spacing and Cockpit Display of Traffic Information (CDTI) Assisted Visual Separation (CAVS) are a part of the Enhanced Visual Approaches Application
Ground Infrastructure Industry Day #1 – June 2006 Industry Day #2 – August 2006 Performance Specification Request for Information (RFI) – September 2006 Industry Day #3 – October 2006 Screening Information Request (SIR) – November 2006 Request for Offer (RFO) – March 2007 Contract Award – July 2007 Key Site Initial Operation Capability (IOC) of Broadcast Services – July 2008 In-Service Decision (ISD) of Broadcast Services – November 2008 Louisville IOC – October 2009 Gulf of Mexico Surveillance IOC – December 2009 Philadelphia IOC – February 2010 Juneau IOC – April 2010 In-Service Decision (ISD) – September 2010 Definition of Program: Dual Track Approach • Avionics Equipage • Rulemaking Project Team Established – May 2006 • Rulemaking Project Record (RPR) Phase 1 and Phase 2 – September 2006 • Economic Assessment of Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) – October 2006 - December 2006 • Internal FAA Coordination – December 2006 - January 2007 • Submittal of NPRM to OST / OMB – February 2007 • Issuance of NPRM – September 2007 • Final Rule Preliminary Concurrence – April 2008 • Final Rule Economic Assessment – June 2008 • Final Rule AGC-1 Approval – December 2008 • Final Rule OST Approval – February 2009 • Final Rule Published – November 2009
Business Case Review: Requested Baseline Costs Requested Baseline Costs (Segment 1)
North Platte, NE Kansas City, KS Garden City, KS Philadelphia, PA Louisville, KY Ontario, CA Gulf of Mexico Segment 1 Locations: Expansion
Segment 1 Locations (Continued) Anchorage Center (ZAN) Bethel Area Southeast Alaska Juneau Area
Acquisition: FAA Life Cycle Management Process CONOPS, ISP, and FPR Approved, May 2006 Industry Week, June 2006 Final Investment Decision (Segment 1), June 2006 Initial Investment Decision, September 2005 RFI, September 2006 SIR, November 2006 Enhanced Surveillance Capability Mission Needs Statement #326, May 2001 Final Investment Decision (Segment 2), February 2007 RFO, March 2007 Final Investment Decision (Remainder Segment 1 & 2), July 2007 Contract Award, July 2007 In Service Decision, September 2010 CONOPS = Concept of Operations; ISP = Integrated Safety Plan; FPR = Final Program Requirements; RFI = Request for Information; SIR = Screening Information Request; RFO = Request for Offer
Safety Risk Management: FAA Life Cycle Management Process Preliminary Hazard Analysis (PHA) Integrated Safety Plan (ISP) Comparative Safety Assessment (CSA) System Safety Program Plan (SSPP) Sub-System Hazard Analysis (SSHA) Operational Safety Assessment (OSA) System Hazard Analysis (SHA) Operating & Support Hazard Analysis (O&SHA) Health Hazard Assessment (HHA) Safety data collection and audits Tech Refresh-specific safety analyses System Safety Assessment Report (SSAR)
Rulemaking: FAA Life Cycle Management Process OPR identifies need for rulemaking Approval of Phase I and Phase II RPR Rulemaking team drafts NPRM OST and OMB Review of NPRM Federal Register Publishes NPRM Approval of Phase III RPR Rulemaking team drafts final rule OST and OMB Review of Final Rule Final Rule Published in Federal Register Link to General Rulemaking Process
Summary • Program has transitioned from Research and Development (R & D) to Implementation • Segment 1 baseline established • Dual track service acquisition and rulemaking activities underway • Risk Mitigation plans in effect • Governance Process • Backup Analysis underway • Separation Standards Workgroup established • Specification coordination with industry and international community Success through a collaborative FAA / industry relationship
Definition of Program: Segment 1 Locations • ADS-B service locations include the following: • Service Coverage Volume: Southeast Alaska Juneau Area • Service Delivery Point: Anchorage Center and Juneau Air Traffic Control Tower • Service: Surveillance, TIS-B, FIS-B • Service Coverage Volume: Gulf of Mexico Area • Service Delivery Point: Houston Center and Helicopter Operator Dispatch Center • Service: Communication, Weather, Surveillance • Service Coverage Volume: Louisville (KY), Kansas City (MO), Garden City (KS), and North Platte (NE) Areas • Service Delivery Point: Louisville TRACON and UPS Airline Operations Center • Service: Surveillance, TIS-B, FIS-B • Service Coverage Volume: Philadelphia, PA and Ontario, CA Areas • Service Delivery Point: Philadelphia TRACON and UPS Airline Operation Center • Service: Surveillance • TIS-B / FIS-B expansion • Existing “east coast deployment” will be expanded westward into the Great Lakes Region • Phoenix/Prescott, AZ coverage will spread westward to Central and Southern California
General Rulemaking Process RPR Process* NPRM Process* Final Rule Process** OPR identifies need for rulemaking Rulemaking team drafts NPRM Comment period closes Final team concurrence 40 Days 2 Weeks OPR prepares Phase I RPR 8-12 Months Rulemaking team disposes of comments Economist draft economic evaluation Internal FAA coordination 45 Days 90 Day Comment Period Council approves Phase I RPR Meets every 6 weeks ANPRM, if necessary Rulemaking team prepares Phase III RPR Final team concurrence Significant? OST Review and OMB Review Yes 120 Days 120 Days No RPR team prepares Phase II RPR Council approves Phase III RPR Internal FAA coordination 1-3 Months Federal Register publishes final rule 15 Days 2 - 4 Weeks Council approves Phase II RPR Subtotal = 16 Months Rulemaking team drafts final rule Significant? OST Review and OMB Review 6 Months Yes Expedited Approach No Economist prepares Regulatory Evaluation End Federal Register publishes NPRM Subtotal = 18 – 24.5 Months Total = 34 Months – 40.5 Months 45 Days Link to Rulemaking 2 Weeks **Source: FAA Office of Rulemaking Quality Management System Rulemaking Manual; Average timeframes provided, actual timeframes depend on size and complexity of project *Estimated durations and diagram provided by AVS/Mitre