Surveillance and Broadcast Services

1. Surveillance and Broadcast Services Weather in the Cockpit Workshop By: Date: August 8, 2006 Robert Strain, Surveillance and Broadcast Services, MITRE

2. Agenda • ATO Organization • Program Charter / Governance • Definition of Program • Business Case Review • Segment 1 Locations • Acquisition Strategy • Safety Risk Management • Rulemaking • Summary

3. ATO Organization

4. ATO-E Organization

5. Program Charter / Governance

6. Definition of Program: Automatic Dependant Surveillance - Broadcast (ADS-B) • Automatic • Periodically transmits information with no pilot or operator input required • Dependent • Position and velocity vector are derived from the Global Positioning System (GPS) or a Flight Management System (FMS) • Surveillance - • A method of determining position of aircraft, vehicles, or other asset • Broadcast • Transmitted information available to anyone with the appropriate receiving equipment

7. TIS-B is a service which provides ADS-B equipped aircraft with position reports from secondary surveillance radar on non-ADS-B equipped aircraft. FIS-B transmits graphical National Weather Service products, temporary flight restrictions (TFRs), and special use airspace. Definition of Program: Traffic Information Service - Broadcast / Flight Information Service - Broadcast

8. Reliable Precision Operations Improve Predictability, Safety and Airspace System Capacity

9. Program Objective • Develop a multi-segment, life cycle managed, performance based ADS-B strategy that aligns with the Next Generation Air Transportation System (NGATS) vision and generates value for the National Airspace System (NAS) • Integrate Concept of Operations for Portfolio of ADS-B Applications • Develop Application Life Cycle Management Approach • Portfolio Management for Applications • Requirements Management Across the Applications • Performance Criteria Management • Establish Infrastructure • Continuously Monitor Value and Adjust Investments

10. Definition of Program: Initial ADS-B Services and Applications (1) Merging and Spacing and Cockpit Display of Traffic Information (CDTI) Assisted Visual Separation (CAVS) are a part of the Enhanced Visual Approaches Application

11. Ground Infrastructure Industry Day #1 – June 2006 Industry Day #2 – August 2006 Performance Specification Request for Information (RFI) – September 2006 Industry Day #3 – October 2006 Screening Information Request (SIR) – November 2006 Request for Offer (RFO) – March 2007 Contract Award – July 2007 Definition of Program: Dual Track Approach • Avionics Equipage • Rulemaking Project Team Established – May 2006 • Rulemaking Project Record (RPR) Phase 1 and Phase 2 – August 2006 • Economic Assessment of Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) – September 2006 - November 2006 • Internal FAA Coordination – December 2006 - January 2007 • Submittal of NPRM to OST / OMB – February 2007 • Issuance of NPRM – September 2007

12. Definition of Program: Segment 1 Schedule

13. Definition of Program: Proposed Schedule - Segments 2 - 4

14. Business Case Review: Economic Analysis – Segment 1 Link to Business Case Review Detail

15. Business Case Review: Requested Baseline Costs Requested Baseline Costs (Segment 1) Link to Total LCCE – Segment 1

16. North Platte, NE Kansas City, KS Garden City, KS Philadelphia, PA Louisville, KY Ontario, CA Gulf of Mexico Segment 1 Locations: Expansion

17. Segment 1 Locations (Continued) Anchorage Center (ZAN) Bethel Area Southeast Alaska Juneau Area

18. Acquisition: FAA Life Cycle Management Process CONOPS, ISP, and FPR Approved, May 2006 Industry Week, June 2006 Final Investment Decision (Segment 1), June 2006 Initial Investment Decision, September 2005 RFI, September 2006 SIR, November 2006 Enhanced Surveillance Capability Mission Needs Statement #326, May 2001 Final Investment Decision (Segment 2), February 2007 RFO, March 2007 Final Investment Decision (Remainder Segment 1 & 2), July 2007 Contract Award, July 2007 In Service Decision, September 2010 CONOPS = Concept of Operations; ISP = Integrated Safety Plan; FPR = Final Program Requirements; RFI = Request for Information; SIR = Screening Information Request; RFO = Request for Offer

19. Safety Risk Management: FAA Life Cycle Management Process Preliminary Hazard Analysis (PHA) Integrated Safety Plan (ISP) Comparative Safety Assessment (CSA) System Safety Program Plan (SSPP) Sub-System Hazard Analysis (SSHA) Operational Safety Assessment (OSA) System Hazard Analysis (SHA) Operating & Support Hazard Analysis (O&SHA) Health Hazard Assessment (HHA) Safety data collection and audits Tech Refresh-specific safety analyses System Safety Assessment Report (SSAR)

20. Rulemaking: FAA Life Cycle Management Process OPR identifies need for rulemaking Approval of Phase I and Phase II RPR Rulemaking team drafts NPRM OST and OMB Review of NPRM Federal Register Publishes NPRM Approval of Phase III RPR Rulemaking team drafts final rule OST and OMB Review of Final Rule Final Rule Published in Federal Register Link to General Rulemaking Process

21. Summary • Program has transitioned from Research and Development (R & D) to Implementation • Segment 1 baseline established • Dual track service acquisition and rulemaking activities underway • Risk Mitigation plans in effect • Governance Process • Backup Analysis underway • Separation Standards Workgroup established • Specification coordination with industry and international community Success through a collaborative FAA / industry relationship

22. Backup

23. Definition of Program: Segment 1 Locations • ADS-B service locations include the following: • Service Coverage Volume: Southeast Alaska Juneau Area • Service Delivery Point: Anchorage Center and Juneau Air Traffic Control Tower • Service: Surveillance, TIS-B, FIS-B • Service Coverage Volume: Gulf of Mexico Area • Service Delivery Point: Houston Center and Helicopter Operator Dispatch Center • Service: Communication, Weather, Surveillance • Service Coverage Volume: Louisville (KY), Kansas City (MO), Garden City (KS), and North Platte (NE) Areas • Service Delivery Point: Louisville TRACON and UPS Airline Operations Center • Service: Surveillance, TIS-B, FIS-B • Service Coverage Volume: Philadelphia, PA and Ontario, CA Areas • Service Delivery Point: Philadelphia TRACON and UPS Airline Operation Center • Service: Surveillance • TIS-B / FIS-B expansion • Existing “east coast deployment” will be expanded westward into the Great Lakes Region • Phoenix/Prescott, AZ coverage will spread westward to Central and Southern California Link to Segment 1 Locations

24. General Rulemaking Process RPR Process* NPRM Process* Final Rule Process** OPR identifies need for rulemaking Rulemaking team drafts NPRM Comment period closes Final team concurrence 40 Days 2 Weeks OPR prepares Phase I RPR 8-12 Months Rulemaking team disposes of comments Economist draft economic evaluation Internal FAA coordination 45 Days 90 Day Comment Period Council approves Phase I RPR Meets every 6 weeks ANPRM, if necessary Rulemaking team prepares Phase III RPR Final team concurrence Significant? OST Review and OMB Review Yes 120 Days 120 Days No RPR team prepares Phase II RPR Council approves Phase III RPR Internal FAA coordination 1-3 Months Federal Register publishes final rule 15 Days 2 - 4 Weeks Council approves Phase II RPR Subtotal = 16 Months Rulemaking team drafts final rule Significant? OST Review and OMB Review 6 Months Yes Expedited Approach No Economist prepares Regulatory Evaluation End Federal Register publishes NPRM Subtotal = 18 – 24.5 Months Total = 34 Months – 40.5 Months 45 Days Link to Rulemaking 2 Weeks **Source: FAA Office of Rulemaking Quality Management System Rulemaking Manual; Average timeframes provided, actual timeframes depend on size and complexity of project *Estimated durations and diagram provided by AVS/Mitre