270 likes | 394 Views
Moving Readers to Proficiency. Using ReadingPlus to motivate and encourage student achievement. HCHS Demographics. Hancock Co., Kentucky (Lewisport) On the Ohio River halfway between Louisville, KY and Evansville, IN Small, rural county with plenty of industry
E N D
Moving Readers to Proficiency Using ReadingPlus to motivate and encourage student achievement
HCHS Demographics • Hancock Co., Kentucky (Lewisport) • On the Ohio River halfway between Louisville, KY and Evansville, IN • Small, rural county with plenty of industry • Over 1600 students in the district – 2 elementary schools, 1 middle school and 1 high school • HCHS had 475 students in 09/10 and currently has 487 enrolled for 10/11
Hancock Co. High School • Less than 5% minority • 35% Free and Reduced population (would qualify for more…) • 45 to 55% of our students go on to college
State Accountability Test ComparisonReading Test • Average Incoming Freshman Lexile = 914.2 (As Of September 10, 2010) • That is a 6.0 Grade Level reading ability. • With active reading instruction, students MAY increase 100 Lexile points per year. (High estimate based on Cross-Curricular Reading Instruction.) • Average growth per year in high school is 50 lexile points or .5 grade level per year. (source: MetraMetrics research) • By the March ACT junior year, projected Lexile level would be 1214.2. • Still 200 Lexile points BELOW the ACT reading exam. So, what are WE doing?
Reading Programs • Our SBDM passed a policy (Summer 2005) that required ANY student not reading at grade level to take a Reading Class in addition to the required Language Arts class. • 9th Grade Students who are tested and considered more than one year below Reading Level. • Reading students remain in reading classes each year until they “test out”
How it all began • Former student surveys indicated need for more reading • Two years of reading course with no curriculum and no textbooks yielded poor results -TABE Test, too many failures -KCCT Reading, yo-yo effect -ACT Reading scores below National Average • Saw the need for something new and innovative
Reading Curriculum Reading class curriculum consists of: • The Seven Keys to Comprehension by Susan Zimmerman and Chryse Hutchins • Intensive Vocabulary Instruction Year One = Roots, Prefixes, and Suffixes Year Two = Hot Words for the SAT • Scholastic Reading Inventory (SRI) • Reading Plus
Placement Procedures • SBDM Policy 3.03 – Revised August 2008 • Based on EPAS (EXPLORE, PLAN, ACT) Data Benchmarks for College/Career Readiness • Based on RTI legislation, the bottom 20% of students not meeting these benchmarks must be remediated at Tier II – these students go into the class. • This is ABOVE & BEYOND state regulation.
Example Data • All EPAS DATA is entered into an EXCEL Workbook for use in multiple departments for RTI, Classroom Instruction, and Scheduling purposes. • Green indicates students who meet their benchmark. • Yellow indicates students in the top 80% of those NOT meeting the benchmark. (Tier I – classroom remediation and monitoring) • Red indicates the bottom 20% placed in a Reading course and Tier II intervention.
Reading Across Content Areas • LEAD-independent and group reading/discussion • Classroom thinking strategies (see packet) • Summer PD 2010 • Independent reading projects
Reading Results • Results!! • Kentucky Core Contest Test (State Assessment) • Student Scores range from Novice-Low, Novice-Mid, Novice-High, Apprentice-Low, Apprentice-Mid, Apprentice-High, Proficient and Distinguished • In 2009, 84.1% of our sophomores scored Proficient or Distinguished! • Only 10 students scored less than Apprentice-High with ONE Novice!
HCHS Academic Success (ACT) • ACT Comparison (HCHS Graduates)
What ReadingPlusIs • An internet based, differentiated reading program • A tool for struggling, adequate, AND advanced students • A comprehension program • A fluency program • A homework tool for independent readers
What ReadingPlus is NOT • A complete reading curriculum • A replacement for direct reading instruction • A substitute for sustained silent reading • An unstructured free time for students
Obstacles we faced • Lab space • Funding • Buy-in, district and school level • Parental support
Student Accountability Rewards Grades • Immediate • Consistent • Simple • Feasible • Motivating • Consistent • Fair
Rewards Individual Whole Class • 70% or higher 3 times in a row on GR = sucker • 80% or higher five times in a row= chocolate • Reaching two out of three goals on GR (Comprehension goal, I-Rate, G-Rate)= 5 bonus points on anything – points used that week • 70% average comprehension at the end of each nine weeks= drop one quiz grade • 80% of class earns 70% or better five (5) times in a row = Movie Day • 80% of class Level Up 1 = free period in gym • 90% of class meet WPM goal three (3) times in a row = donuts or pizza! • 100% of class level up 2 = field trip!
Grades • Guided Reading is a daily grade each session. • Vocabulary (Cloze Plus or RAW) is a daily grade once per week.
Teacher matters • All great programs rely on attentive and consistent teachers! • Must be positive! • Must be motivating! • Must be attentive! • Learning the hard way…
Lists each student’s individual scores on specific reading skills that are aligned with standards. Student Skills Report
Standardized Results • Advanced Juniors – average ACT Reading increase, 8.4 • KCCT Reading – 98 to 103 in one year! • 2010 Junior ACT -78 Juniors completed at least 20 RPlus sessions -53 Juniors did not complete ANY RPlus sessions -Average reading score for RPlus Juniors = 19.72 -Average reading score for non-RPlus Juniors = 17.29 -ReadingPlus students scores were 2.43 scale points higher than those not enrolled in the program -A 3rd year reading student who has completed ReadingPlus for 3 years scored a 30 in Reading!
ReadingPlus with RTI • Works as a Tier I, Tier II, or Tier III intervention • Differentiation caters to individual needs and skills • Can use skills report to assess key weaknesses, such as “identifying main idea,” or “making inferences” • Because all students in a class are involved, students do NOT feel singled out