130 likes | 305 Views
ETP Food for Life (1) History and Achievements First ideas for an agri-food ETP : October 2004 Official launch of the ETP Food for Life and b asi c Vision Paper prepared under auspices of CIAA: July 2005
E N D
ETP Food for Life (1) History and Achievements First ideas for an agri-food ETP: October 2004 Official launch of the ETP Food for Life and basic Vision Paper prepared underauspices of CIAA: July 2005 Board, Operational Committee and Working Groups : formed in December 2005, ensuring representation of all stakeholders Strategic Research Agenda: pubblished in September 2007 after extensivenational, regional and web-based consultations Implementation Action Plan:finalised in October 2008
ETP Food for Life (2) History and Achievements 36 National Food Technology Platforms andNTP-network developed Workshops on Public/Private Partnerships established : January 2007 Creation of SME Task Force: April 2007 Creation of Member State Mirror Group: June 2008
ETP Food for Life (3) History and acheivements • CIAA introduced the ETP Food for Life into its Road Map: 2009 • Linkage with the European Platform on Diet, Phisycal Activity and Health ( throught CIAA) • Recognition by the EU: • Financial support through FP6 Specific Support Action 2006 • 90% of SRA-based priorities included in all calls of the FP7 Knowledge Based Bio Economy, theme 2 : 2009 • European Commission High Level Group recognized importance of the ETP : 2009
Core Challenges addressed in the Strategic Research Agenda ( SRA) Communication, Training & Technology Transfer Food Food & Quality & Health Manu- facturing Food Safety - Food & Sustainable Consumer Food Production Food Chain Management Ensuring that the healthy choice is the easy choice for consumers Delivering a healthier diet Delivering quality food products Assuring safe foods that consumers can trust Achieving sustainable food production Managing the food chain
From the Strategic Research Agenda (SRA) to the Implementation Action Plan ( IAP ) The SRA outlined three key research thrusts to ensure that European resources are effectively targeted to boost competitiveness of the sector. The aim of the IAP is to turn the proposalsmade in the Strategic Research Agenda intofocused, multi-disciplinary andcollaborative activities.
Key Thrusts Improve health, well-being and longevity Build consumer trust in the food chain Sustainable and ethical production New products, processes and tools that….....
KT 3 Sustainable & Ethical production KT 1 Food, Health, Well-being and Longevity KT 2 Consumer trust in the food chain CIAA Research/Science group Board of ETP Food for Life MS Mirror Group Coordination Committee incl. Horizontal Activities Research & Innovation Cooperation Outreach National Platforms SME Task Force PPP Task Force ERANets etc. Lead Market Task Force International Activities Task Force CTTT Activities Stakeholders
National Platforms • Based in Food & Drink organisations Nationally • Operate Nationally • Cooperate in identifying funding • Cooperate on identifying issues of relevans for the private sector • Including SME’s activities
Improving resources utilisation: the ETP Member States Mirror Group Created in June 2008 Chair: • Lisbeth Munksgaard Composition : • National funding bodies • Ministries representatives Mission : • Exchanging best practice and informationabout the topics included in national strategicprogrammes of research • Leading to theidentification of overlaps and duplication • Explore opportunities for aligningresearch programmes • Developing joint calls(for example, through ERA-NETplus activities),
Next Steps Development of the Implementation Plan: • Stimulation of formation of ERA Nets on • Food, Health, Wellbeing & Longevity, • Sustainable Food Production/Food Chain Management, • Food-you-can-trust (extension of SAFEFoodERA). • Development of a potential Lead Market (food and health) • Stimulating the creation of public-private partnershipsand specific Eureka themes • Identifying “funding opportunities” (COST, European Institute of Technology, European Investment Bank, Venture Capital, etc…) • Improving communication training and technology transfer • Creating afavourable business environment (improvedregulation, standards, IPR, etc.) to gainfull commercial benefits of innovations
Problemstillinger om funding • Hvad er ambitionsniveauet: • Projekt calls? • Programmer • Veje til at få emnerne på dagsorden: • I EU: PC, MS, Adv. Boards, Andre forslagsstillere • Nationalt: FØSU, FVM, andre interessenter • Dansk problemstilling: Hvor får man finansieret et ERA-net?