671 likes | 2.44k Views
Observational Gait Analysis. Nerrolyn Ford PhD. Issues for discussion. The observational gait analysis process Reliability/Validity What is done in practice? Visual search strategies Decision making strategies. Selection of Cues to observe. Evaluation of Cues. Interpretation of findings.
E N D
Observational Gait Analysis Nerrolyn Ford PhD
Issues for discussion • The observational gait analysis process • Reliability/Validity • What is done in practice? • Visual search strategies • Decision making strategies
Selection of Cues to observe Evaluation of Cues Interpretation of findings The Observational Gait Analysis process
Selection of Cues to observe Evaluation of Cues Interpretation of findings Plane: Coronal Sagittal Parameter Temporal Spatial Kinematic Region: Feet KneesHipsTrunkShoulderArmsHandsHead
Selection of Cues to observe Evaluation of Cues Interpretation of findings Theoretical/biomechanical knowledge Working environment/ Interaction with colleagues Internalizedmodel of “normal walking” Experience/exposure to similar cases
Selection of Cues to observe Evaluation of Cues Interpretation of findings Decision not to intervene Normal Decision to intervene Decision about success of treatment Abnormal Decision to attend to different cues
Research Aims • Investigate and describe the current practice of observational gait analysis from an information processing and visual search perspective • Develop and test an observational gait analysis training program
Decision making in OGA • Examine specific methods and cognitive processes used by clinicians performing observational gait analysis. • Identify sources of error and bias that may compromise OGA reliability and validity
Method (subjects) • 17 clinicians represent different professional groups • Prosthetics, orthotics, physiotherapy, medicine • Clinicians evaluated in their own clinical environment while performing a gait related consultation • Video assisted recall
Method • Prior to performing a clinical consultation clinicians were fitted with a lightweight head mounted video camera
Recall session • Immediately after performing the consultation clinicians participated in a recall session • View video and attempt to verbalise thoughts, feeling and decisions they remember having had at the time of the consultation • Recall sessions dubbed over a copy of the original tape and transcribed verbatim for coding and analysis
Transcript coding • Decision type • treatment or diagnostic • Decision strategy • Hypothetico-deductive, pattern recognition, exhaustive, multiple branching • Observational variables • kinematic upper limb • kinematic lower limb • temporospatial
All clinicians tend to use a pattern recognition decision strategy Clinicians differ in the types of decisions made Clinicians differ in the observational variables they consider Major findings
If clinicians differ in the information they consider, do they differ in the information they visually attend to?
Study aims • Compare the visual search strategies of expert clinicians, novice clinicians and lay subjects
Testing sessions • Video taped footage of 10 gait affected and 2 non affected subjects (split screen) • Identify “major” walking problems • Eye movements tracked using video based eye tracking system (DBA systems inc.)
Participants 16 expert clinicians Prosthetists, orthotists, physiotherapists, medical specialist 13 novice clinicians 2nd year prosthetics and orthotics students 5 lay subjects No prior experience in gait assessment
Recording of eye movements using video based tracking system
Data analysis procedure • x-y coordinates of eye position (eye tracker) • x-y coordinates of major joints, head & trunk (PEAK) • visual fixation occurs when eye remains within designated region for 0.24 seconds
Data analysis Visual fixations Location Plane (coronal or sagittal) Body region (feet, knees, hips, trunk, shoulders, elbows, hands, head) Sequencing
Sequencing of visual fixations Lay subjects Novice subjects Expert subjects
Important findings • Coronal plane viewing bias (expert/novice and lay subjects) • expert clinicians allocate significantly greater proportion of fixations to the trunk and upper body • eye movement transitions most likely to occur from superior to an inferior body region • Novice clinicians more likely to make eye movement transitions between anatomically distant body regions
Can visual search strategies be taught to novice clinicians?
Traditional model of teaching observational gait analysis • Knowledge/cue based learning • Specific body regions (Segment by segment) • Theoretical training rather than experience based training
Perceptual training • Novice task performers will eventually gravitate towards pattern recognition decision strategies • Training more efficient if it complements pattern recognition strategies from the outset • (Kirlik et al., 1996)
Perceptual training • Reduces cognitive load • Less sensitive to situations of high stress, time pressures • More likely to be retained over a period of time (Rogers et al., 1997)
Aim Investigate effects of perceptual training on visual search strategies of novice clinicians
Method Testing sessions 1 - pre-training 2 - post training 3 - five months post training
Sequencing of visual fixationsPathology-based learning group Pre-training Post-training 5 months post
Sequencing of visual fixationsCue-based learning group Pre-training Post-training 5 months post
Discussion • Both training groups significantly increased the proportion of fixations directed at the upper body • Cue groups were less rapid to respond to training, did not adopt the search strategy emphasised throughout training.
How can we improve our OGA skills • Recognize errors and biases • Observer training • Optimize viewing conditions • Collect appropriate patient information (narrow the search) • Identify visual cues that can be observed in a valid and reliable manner • Nature and number of visual cues that must be observed in order to make a valid and reliable decision