1 / 30

The Nottingham liver disease stratification pathway

The Nottingham liver disease stratification pathway. Dr Neil Guha and Dr Emilie Wilkes. Outline of session. LFTS in primary care Why the need for change and aims of the pathway Walk through the pathway using examples. LFTs in primary care. LFTS are utilised widely in primary care

dwoolard
Download Presentation

The Nottingham liver disease stratification pathway

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Nottingham liver disease stratification pathway Dr Neil Guha and Dr Emilie Wilkes

  2. Outline of session • LFTS in primary care • Why the need for change and aims of the pathway • Walk through the pathway using examples

  3. LFTs in primary care • LFTS are utilised widely in primary care • Ballets study table • >40 % chronic disease Management

  4. Three perspectives What we currently do with abnormal LFTS • Primary care • Ignore as not requested for liver (anxiety) • Repeat (might go away) • Refer to secondary care (expense and futility) • Patient • Is my liver damaged, why and what can be done? • Abnormal Liver tests = alcohol • Secondary care • Non-significant disease in new referrals. • LFTS unhelpful in identifying patients at high risk of liver mortality (e.g. cirrhosis)

  5. The rationale for detecting significant liver disease Patient perspective • Have I got something seriously wrong with my liver now? • Will I die from this, if so when and from what ? • Are things getting worse or better with or treatment/observation ? Healthcare perspective • Can we pick this up at a stage where it is serious enough to intervene but not too late to be palliative and/or expensive • Can we intervene with liver specific interventions ( e.g. Pioglitazone in NAFLD and cirrhosis strategies) • Can we organise care in an effective manner (outcomes and costs) • Can we “nudge” behaviour in a positive way for lifestyle aetiologies • Can we select appropriate patients for emerging and/or expensive treatments

  6. How do we assess liver disease

  7. Natural History of Chronic Liver Disease Risk Factors Alcohol Obesity / Diabetes Viral hepatitis Scarring Severe Scarring (Cirrhosis) Symptoms Death 5-20 yrs 10%/yr

  8. A pilot study to tests a community pathway • Targeting risk factors • Synergistic in effect • Applicable to multiple aetiology • Diagnostics performed in the community • Point of care diagnostics in primary care • Diagnostics/brief intervention delivered by nurses • Specialists placed in the community • Integrated primary and secondary care • Hepatology clinics in primary care McCorry et al., QIM 2012; Dolman et al., Liv Int 2013

  9. Fibroscan

  10. Fibroscan • Results affected by: • Obesity • Narrow Rib spaces • Liver inflammation • May not be possible to obtain reliable reading • Operator dependent • Contraindicated in pregnancy, intracardiac devices • Metaanalysis – >90% NPV and PPV for cirrhosis Friedrich-Rust et al, Gastroenterology, 2008

  11. Outcomes • Liver disease • Increased detection of significant liver disease (25 % of those having a community scan) including cirrhosis (3 fold increase) • 68.3% of patients with elevated liver stiffness had normal liver function enzymes • 73.1% of patients with proven cirrhosis had normal liver function enzymes • Patient experience (n=349; 378 forms distributed) • 93.7% of patients would definitely recommend service to friends and family • 95.9% felt that the appointment was important or very important for their health • 94.3% felt they were given enough information • Engagement with pathway • 95 % of investigations were performed in the community setting • Attendance rate for community Fibroscan appointment was 95 % • Cost effective • ICER for NAFLD and ALD are £2,000 and £6,000 respectively

  12. Changing our Approach to Liver Disease Current approach: • Lacks accuracy • Late detection • Hospital based • Costly and invasive Alternative approach: • Focus on risk factors • Early detection • Community testing • Cost saving NHS innovations award winners 2013 BMJ team of the year finalists 2015

  13. NICE guidelines 2016 on NAFLD and cirrhosis • Awareness that NAFLD is common in type 2 diabetes/met syndrome • Detection of NAFLD. FLI index was most cost effective – not a definitive recommendation • Detection of advanced fibrosis in NAFLD ( serum markers of liver fibrosis – ELF score) • Confirmation of cirrhosis using Fibroscan ( hazardous alcohol and advanced fibrosis in NAFLD) • Statins should not be stopped (unless liver enzymes double within 3/12) • Pioglitazone recommended for advanced fibrosis in NAFLD • Cirrhosis surveillance recommended for varices (OGD) and HCC (U/S)

  14. Concepts of the Nottinghamshire Adult Liver Disease Stratification pathway • Focussed on risk factors in addition to LFTS • Compromise between the views of the CCG, hepatology and NICE guidance • Stratification of liver risk rather than a definitive diagnostic test • Highlighting the need to link in with community services that deal with the underlying issues driving the risk factors including alcohol and weight loss

  15. Acknowledging the following • Complex to follow ! • The ICE interface is currently far from ideal and the need to take on feedback form users to improve this • Fatty Liver Index uses variables that may not be easy to access ( e.g. waist circumference and GGT) • The pathway is not didactic in some aspects – both an advantage and disadvantage • The pathway will be evaluated and iterated

  16. Case 1 • 56 y/o female.Teacher • Only significant medical history was asthma • Hazardous alcohol intake for many years ( 30 units/week) but increase in last 18 months following work issues ( 50 units/week). Normal LFTs. BMI 30. • Monthly visits to GP with different symptoms over 9 months. Found to be hypertensive. Advised to reduce alcohol intake. Declined alcohol services. “Not an alcoholic”. • Invited to participate in the community study.

  17. Case 1 • Fibroscan reading elevated at 25 KpA • Review with hepatology and cirrhosis confirmed • OGD – showed early varices • Diagnosis was a “shock” ; cirrhosis was a diagnosis for people who “drank on park benches”. • Engaged with last orders, now abstinent for 2 years , off anti-hypertensive meds and has also lost 2 stones in weight. • Varices have disappeared on follow up endoscopy

  18. Case 2 • 38 y/o shop assistant • History of anxiety – uses alcohol as anxiolytic (20 units per week) • Fluctuating weight with BMI of 30 to 35; borderline diabetes; raised cholesterol of 7 • Strong FH of IHD and hyperlipidaemia • GP had offered statin but declined • ALT 67 but AST/ALT ratio normal • Referred to secondary care

  19. Case 2 • Liver screen performed in hospital – negative • U/S – shows significant steatosis . • FLI index consists of: BMI, waist circumference, Gamma GT and Triglyceride levels (pre current local guidance not calculated, but if it had been >60). • Fibroscan was 12 Kpa – indeterminate range • Petrified of liver biopsy – declined this. However the idea that she may have liver disease and this may stratify for future CV risk taken on board. • Lost 3 stones (via community weight loss services), referred for CBT and started statin • LFTS normal 12 months later and no evidence of insulin sensitivity

  20. Case 3 MG 47 y/o security officer Type 2 diabetes , BMI 36 , teetotal Raised ALT fluctuating between 60 and 90 for 5 years AST/ALT ratio elevated 0.9. Liver screen not performed U/S – severe steatosis Declined referral. Assumed fatty liver

  21. Case 3 Presented to hospital for episode of non specific chest pain. Abnormal LFTs noted and Liver screen requested – Hep B serology was positive (sAg and HBV DNA +ve) On further questioning – regular trips to Thailand with unprotected intercourse Treated with oral therapy ( HBV levels are undetected).

  22. Case 4 • 52 y/o house wife • Presents with “tired all the time” symptoms • Overweight BMI 30; Hypertension and hyperlipidaemia • Strong FH of type 2 DM • ALT 50, AST/ALT 0.9, ALP 456 • Community U/S – shows steatosis, gall stones in GB. • Referred to secondary care

  23. Case 4 • Liver screen performed in hospital – positive Anti-mitochondrial Antibody and IgM raised • Liver biopsy – discussed and agreed. • Diagnosis of Primary Biliary Cholangitis (Stage 3 disease – Advanced fibrosis, not cirrhosis), some steatosis present. • LFTs normal after 12 months of Ursodeoxycholic acid. • Fatigue symptoms persist but participates in local PBC support group and has developed coping strategies.

  24. Feedback: e Healthscope Issues Log

  25. The Scarred Liver Project Team • Guru Aithal • Dave Harman • Becky Harris • Neil Guha • Tim Card • Steve Ryder • Martin James • Emilie Wilkes • Aquiline Chivinge • AHSN • Nick Hamilton • Lucy Sitton-Kent • Primary Care • Matt Jelpke • Sean Ottey • Ken Brown • Marcia Chamberlain

More Related