1 / 36

A Review of Geological Modeling

. Why Is Modeling

dyani
Download Presentation

A Review of Geological Modeling

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. A Review of Geological Modeling A. Keith Turner Colorado School of Mines & Carl W. Gable Los Alamos National Laboratory

    2. Why Is Modeling & Visualization Important? The World of the Geoscientist Is Multi-dimensional Current interpretation methods limit this view Digital versions of traditional maps are not sufficient Increased efficiency demands computer-based methods to: Integrate and Manage the data Interpret geological features Visualize attributes spatially and temporally Model dynamic Earth processes

    3. Importance of This Topic … 3-D subsurface modeling first became feasible in late 1980’s with the introduction of high-performance Unix-based graphical workstations Developing digital representations of the subsurface does not ensure high-quality and efficiently managed projects Society is increasingly demanding: multi-scale, multidisciplinary, integrative projects a shift from passive data collection and archiving to dynamic information management and dissemination

    4. Over The Past Decade Enormously more powerful computers and data storage have vastly reduced costs! Continuing, rapid advances in computer HARDWARE and SOFTWARE technologies Modeling & visualization increasingly integrated Increasingly realistic models possible

    5. Problems in Subsurface Investigation are Unique... Subsurface information is often incomplete and conflicting; The subsurface is naturally complex and heterogeneous; Sampling is most often insufficient to resolve all uncertainties; and Scale effects on rock , fluid, and other properties are usually unknown. TO BEGIN.... There are many problems in subsurface investigation which are unique only to the geosciences. These problems will dictate many of the requirements for an n-Dimensional Earth Modeler. To begin, the subsurface information with which we have to work is often incomplete and conflicting. Even with 3D seismic, the results are often ambigious, and conflict with well information. This is both a matter of the scale of the volume of rock measured, and the resolution at which it is measured by the tool being used. At its best, the resolution of 3D seismic is no more than 45 feet (+/- 15 m), yet a very large volume of the subsurface can be measured. A well on the otherhand can be logged to a few inches or even mm’s of resolution (if for instance cores are taken), but the volume of the subsurface actually sampled is very small on a regional scale. Yet, in nD modeling, these two disparate data types will be combined into a final interpretation. The natural complexity of the subsurface adds yet another problem. The complex and heterogeneous nature of the subsurface makes modeling of attribute distribution and visualization very difficult. We are often forced to make ad hoc simplifications in the model which reduce its validity and the usefulness of the model for the purpose for which it was constructed. Our inability to sufficiently sample the subsurface is constrained by both cost and the availability of tools with which to measure the desired property or properties. Scale effects on rock, fluid, and other geologic processes are usually unknown......more ?????? TO BEGIN.... There are many problems in subsurface investigation which are unique only to the geosciences. These problems will dictate many of the requirements for an n-Dimensional Earth Modeler. To begin, the subsurface information with which we have to work is often incomplete and conflicting. Even with 3D seismic, the results are often ambigious, and conflict with well information. This is both a matter of the scale of the volume of rock measured, and the resolution at which it is measured by the tool being used. At its best, the resolution of 3D seismic is no more than 45 feet (+/- 15 m), yet a very large volume of the subsurface can be measured. A well on the otherhand can be logged to a few inches or even mm’s of resolution (if for instance cores are taken), but the volume of the subsurface actually sampled is very small on a regional scale. Yet, in nD modeling, these two disparate data types will be combined into a final interpretation. The natural complexity of the subsurface adds yet another problem. The complex and heterogeneous nature of the subsurface makes modeling of attribute distribution and visualization very difficult. We are often forced to make ad hoc simplifications in the model which reduce its validity and the usefulness of the model for the purpose for which it was constructed. Our inability to sufficiently sample the subsurface is constrained by both cost and the availability of tools with which to measure the desired property or properties. Scale effects on rock, fluid, and other geologic processes are usually unknown......more ??????

    6. Why We Need Special Modeling and Visualization Tools and Not Just CAD

    7. A Typical Modeling Project

    8. Geometry (Descriptive) Modeling Definition: Geometry (Descriptive) Modeling involves visually describing, through various means such as computer graphics and modeling: The geologic framework Distribution and propagation of attributes

    9. 3-D Model Involves Two Stages Framework Definition Borehole and isolated sample data Triangulated surfaces 2-D grids and meshes Iso-volumetric models – from triangulated surfaces – from cross-sections – from grids and meshes – parametric (NURBS, etc) – Boundary Representations Discretisation and Property Distribution 3-D grids and meshes – regular hexahedral – octree variable – geocellular – tetrahedral unstructured meshes

    10. Modeling Often Begins with Borehole Data

    11. Geometry Models can be Constructed Using Cross-Sections

    12. 3-D Solid Models can be developed from Multiple Surfaces

    13. Layered Models may involve many surfaces Complex channels and “pinch-outs” are difficult to model

    14. Regional (Volumetric) Subdivision Feasible for Non-stratigraphic Cases

    15. Framework Models require Grids or Meshes to assign Property Distributions

    16. Geological Framework Defined First – then Grid Resolution

    17. Discretisation may involve “structured” and “unstructured” meshes

    18. “Geocellular” Volumetric Model

    19. Yucca Mountain Represented by a Tetrahedral Mesh Model

    20. Accurately Modeling Faults is a Challenge Near-horizontal thrust faults form additional surfaces Steeply inclined Faults commonly shown as vertical

    21. Advanced Fault Modeling

    22. Models may be “Nested” from Regional to Local Scales

    23. Purpose of Modeling is Prediction… Prediction has an extrapolative rather than interpolative character… Involves risk Leads to Decision-making

    24. Predictive Modeling Definition: Predictive Modeling involves prediction and/or simulation of events, dynamic and other types of processes occurring in the geological subsurface: Solve equations, or other numerical analyses Forward and inverse modeling techniques

    25. Another example is given in this model. This is a again a relatively layer cake type geology, but now we want to represent, model and visualize the distribution of a particular contaminant in the subsurface…..particularly within the blue layer, here presumed to be an aquifer.Another example is given in this model. This is a again a relatively layer cake type geology, but now we want to represent, model and visualize the distribution of a particular contaminant in the subsurface…..particularly within the blue layer, here presumed to be an aquifer.

    26. This image shows the overall volume and distribution of the contamination, in this case, lead….within the geologic strataThis image shows the overall volume and distribution of the contamination, in this case, lead….within the geologic strata

    27. If we peel away the strata, we can see only the contaminant volume itself and we can begin to slice through the volume to see the concentration levels of lead. The sticks represent borehole data points. The coloring on the sticks represents the thickness and nature of the geological strata at each penetration. Hotter colors are used to represent the concentrations of lead. In most cases like this some multivariate statistical technique or more commonly, multiple conditional probabilities (I.e., stochastic techniques, geostatistics) are used to determine the concentrations between wells.If we peel away the strata, we can see only the contaminant volume itself and we can begin to slice through the volume to see the concentration levels of lead. The sticks represent borehole data points. The coloring on the sticks represents the thickness and nature of the geological strata at each penetration. Hotter colors are used to represent the concentrations of lead. In most cases like this some multivariate statistical technique or more commonly, multiple conditional probabilities (I.e., stochastic techniques, geostatistics) are used to determine the concentrations between wells.

    28. The Bottom Line … Trends in 3-D Modeling Continuing, rapid advances in computer technologies Increasingly realistic models possible “Coarse-” vs. “Fine-scale” Models Cannot easily incorporate geologic knowledge (i.e. geologic interpretations) Difficulties representing uncertainties Hampered by imprecise data and inability to adequately sample the prototype

    29. The Modeling Challenge Build 3-D models from isolated bore data and “soft” information Connect known conditions between the boreholes Model real-world complexity Verify the resulting models Represent the uncertainties of the geologic framework Reduce cost and time of model development

    30. An Integrated Data Management Process

    31. What Benefits will an Integrative Approach Provide?? To the Individual Scientist – To the Scientist’s Organization – To the “Client” Organizations and Their Staff – To Society at Large –

    32. Benefits to the Individual Scientist – More time for science, so…. More interactions with colleagues More interesting projects/studies More job satisfaction More publications More rapid promotions

    33. Benefits to the Scientist’s Organization – Society Maximize Organization’s Value to “Customers” Maximize Strategic Value – BETTER! Maximize Financial Value – CHEAPER! Maximize Operational Effectiveness – FASTER!

    34. Benefits to the “Client” Organizations and Their Staff – Model Consistency Data versioning, audit trail, documentation QA compliance Improved Predictive Capability & Model Maintenance Efficiency: streamlining processes, updating databases Auto-updating decision support tools

    35. Benefits to Society at Large – Relevant science that supports decision-making Clearly communicated results Cost reductions

    36. Questions???

More Related