1 / 29

2011 Achievement Gaps By Various Subgroups: Reading and Math EOG

2011 Achievement Gaps By Various Subgroups: Reading and Math EOG. Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools Board of Education October 11, 2011. Introduction.

dylan-franks
Download Presentation

2011 Achievement Gaps By Various Subgroups: Reading and Math EOG

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2011 Achievement GapsBy Various Subgroups:Reading and Math EOG Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools Board of Education October 11, 2011

  2. Introduction • The following charts compare the EOG performance in reading and math by gender and other subgroup classifications for African-American, Hispanic and White students • Due to the small number of students for American Indian, Asian and Multiracial subgroups, results are variable and demonstrate inconsistent patterns • Charts include the 5 Urban Districts when data are available

  3. MATH

  4. Historical Math Gaps

  5. 2011 Math 3-8 Proficiency by Group and Urban District

  6. LEP URBAN COMPARISONS 2011 Math 3-8 LEP vs. Not LEP Percent of Math 3-8 Tested Population that is LEP

  7. 2011 EOG MATH 3-8:By Gender & Ethnicity 4.5 2.7 5.8 4.7 3.6 1.1 2.0 0.4 -- -- -1.1 2.5 1.9 0.9 -0.2

  8. 2010 vs. 2011 Math EOG 3-8Gender Gap Difference: African-American

  9. 2010 vs. 2011 Math EOG 3-8Gender Gap Difference: Hispanic

  10. 2010 & 2011 EOG Math: WSFCS Gender Gaps by Ethnicity & Grade

  11. 2011 Math EOG 3-8: Lunch Eligibility By Ethnicity Numbers in parentheses reflect percent of population

  12. 2011 Math EOG 3-8: Free/Reduced Lunch By Ethnicity and Gender

  13. 2011 Math EOG 3-8: Paid Lunch By Ethnicity and Gender

  14. 2011 Math EOG 3-8: Free/Reduced Lunch By Ethnicity and LEP Status

  15. 2011 Math EOG 3-8: Paid Lunch By Ethnicity and LEP Status

  16. READING

  17. Historical Reading Gaps

  18. 2011 Reading 3-8 Proficiency by Group and Urban District

  19. LEP URBAN COMPARISONS 2011 Reading 3-8 LEP vs. Not LEP Percent of Reading 3-8 Tested Population that is LEP

  20. 2011 EOG READING 3-8:By Gender & Ethnicity 8.9 7.0 8.2 9.8 6.6 2.8 4.3 1.4 2.5 2.7 2.5 7.1 5.3 5.0 3.3

  21. 2010 vs. 2011 Reading EOG 3-8Gender Gap Difference:African-American

  22. 2010 vs. 2011 Reading EOG 3-8Gender Gap Difference:Hispanic

  23. 2010 & 2011 EOG Reading: WSFCS Gender Gaps by Ethnicity & Grade

  24. 2011 Reading EOG 3-8: Lunch Eligibility By Ethnicity Numbers in parentheses reflect percent of population

  25. 2011 Reading EOG 3-8: Free/Reduced Lunch By Ethnicity and Gender

  26. 2011 Reading EOG 3-8: Paid Lunch By Ethnicity and Gender

  27. 2011 Reading EOG 3-8: Free/Reduced Lunch By Ethnicity and LEP Status

  28. 2011 Reading EOG 3-8: Paid Lunch By Ethnicity and LEP Status

  29. Summary • Gender Gaps are larger in the middle grades • Gender Gaps are larger for the African-American and Hispanic subgroup as a whole and increasingly in middle grades for African-American students • Economic differences account for about 1/3 – 1/2 of the gap for African-American students • English proficiency and economic differences account for virtually all of the gap for Hispanic students

More Related