480 likes | 725 Views
2. Agenda. Where are we with the Core Content, Version 4.0?What is Depth of Knowledge and how will it influence item development for the 2007 state assessment?. 3. Core Content for Assessment, Version 4.0. Not a comprehensive curriculum or course of studySubset of the Program of StudiesReprese
E N D
1. Kentucky’s Core Content for Assessment, Version 4.O
2. 2 Agenda Where are we with the Core Content, Version 4.0?
What is Depth of Knowledge and how will it influence item development for the 2007 state assessment?
3. 3 Core Content for Assessment, Version 4.0 Not a comprehensive curriculum or course of study
Subset of the Program of Studies
Represents content standards from Kentucky’s Academic Expectations and the Program of Studies
4. 4 The Core Content for Assessment, Version 4.0 Provides parameters for test developers as they design the state assessment items and identifies content that is fair game for inclusion on the state assessment.
Provides focus for the development of the 2007 Kentucky Core Content Test (KCCT). Captures the “big ideas.”
5. 5 The Core Content for Assessment Provides additional clarity and support for instruction beginning school year 2006 – 2007.
6. 6 Core Content for Assessment CCA, 4.0 draft posted on the KDE website
2007 assessment contract to be awarded in January 2006
Field test the items developed from CCA, 4.0 in the Spring 2006
Make any adjustments to CCA based on field test and external reviews
7. 7 Core Content for Assessment Schools and districts can begin to use CCA, 4.0 to adjust their curriculum
Crosswalks between 3.0 and 4.0 are posted on KDE website
Upcoming ISN Newsletters will identify any updates and provide the link to the most current drafts (Next update, 10/19)
8. 8
9. 9 To maintain focus on what is assessed at the state, without narrowing the curriculum locally.
10. 10 End of primary, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, high school
To ensure continuity and conceptual development, even though the current state assessment varies for those grade levels based on the content area. The Core Content for Assessment Version 4.0 is organized by grade level (end of primary – 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, and high school) in order to ensure continuity and conceptual development even though the current state assessment varies for those grade levels based on the content area. This is different from the current 3.0 Version, which is organized in grade spans.
Core Content standards under each assertion highlight the grade level differences. The Core Content standards are usually aligned across grade level clusters to show the spiraling curriculum of social studies where a concept is introduced in elementary school and further developed in middle and high school. The numbers may be different but the concept usually spirals.
The Core Content for Assessment Version 4.0 is organized by grade level (end of primary – 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, and high school) in order to ensure continuity and conceptual development even though the current state assessment varies for those grade levels based on the content area. This is different from the current 3.0 Version, which is organized in grade spans.
Core Content standards under each assertion highlight the grade level differences. The Core Content standards are usually aligned across grade level clusters to show the spiraling curriculum of social studies where a concept is introduced in elementary school and further developed in middle and high school. The numbers may be different but the concept usually spirals.
11. 11 Organized using Bold and Italicized Statements Bold = state assessed
Italicized = supporting content Core content statements are bolded for “state assessment” or italicized for “supporting content but not for state assessment”. The intent is to show what core content statements are fair game to be assessed on the Kentucky Core Content Test (KCCT) and those that instructionally support the state assessed content, but will not be assessed at the state level.
Core content statements are bolded for “state assessment” or italicized for “supporting content but not for state assessment”. The intent is to show what core content statements are fair game to be assessed on the Kentucky Core Content Test (KCCT) and those that instructionally support the state assessed content, but will not be assessed at the state level.
12. 12 Organized using Parentheses If there is a list inside with an e.g.,, preceding it, that means the examples included are meant to be just that, examples.
If the list is NOT preceded by an e.g., the list is to be considered exhaustive and those items that are fair game for assessment..
13. 13 Organized using Verbs to represent how students will be expected to demonstrate their knowledge;
to reflect the depth of knowledge and cognitive complexity expected for the state assessment. The content statements for the state assessment have been clarified with verbs to represent what students will be expected to do and to reflect the depth of knowledge and cognitive complexity expected for the state assessment. They are not meant to limit the cognitive complexity for instruction in the classroom. In order for students to perform at a high level on the KCCT, they need to have mastered the supporting content as well as the state assessed content.The content statements for the state assessment have been clarified with verbs to represent what students will be expected to do and to reflect the depth of knowledge and cognitive complexity expected for the state assessment. They are not meant to limit the cognitive complexity for instruction in the classroom. In order for students to perform at a high level on the KCCT, they need to have mastered the supporting content as well as the state assessed content.
14. 14 Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Established Depth of Knowledge levels to indicate the cognitive demand limits for the state assessment and to guide item development, classification of items, and alignment to Kentucky standards
Coded each Core Content for Assessment Standard to the DOK level that represents the “ceiling” or highest level for assessment
15. 15 Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Applied Norman Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Levels (1997, 2003)
Drew upon other work such as NAEP’s (2004) Levels of Complexity and Dr. Andy Porter’s Curriculum Content Analysis of Student Expectations (2002, 2004)
16. 16 Depth of Knowledge
Descriptive, not a taxonomy
Focuses on how deeply a student has to know the content in order to respond
Not the same as difficulty
17. 17 Depth of Knowledge Interpreting and assigning depth-of-knowledge levels to content standards and assessment items is an essential requirement of alignment analysis.
Four levels of depth of knowledge were used for our analysis:
Level 1 - Recall and Reproduction
Level 2 – Skills & Concepts
Level 3 - Strategic reasoning
Level 4 - Extended reasoning
18. 18 Level 1 Recall and Reproduction Focus is on specific facts, definitions, details, or using routine procedures (measure, divide, follow recipe, etc.); explaining “that”…; can be “difficult” without requiring “deep” content knowledge to respond to item (memorize a complex theory without being able to explain its meaning or apply it to a real work situation); a combination of level ones do not = level 2; one right answer
19. 19 DOK Level 1 Examples Reads words in isolation
Locate or recall facts or details explicitly presented in text
Performs a simple scientific process or set of procedures
Identify or describe features of places or people
20. 20 DOK Level 1 Examples Solve linear equations
Determine the perimeter or area of rectangles or triangles given a drawing or labels
21. 21 Level 2: Skills/Conceptual Understanding Focus is on applying skills (in a familiar/typical situation) and concepts, relationships (compare, cause-effect), main ideas – requires deeper knowledge than definition; explaining how or why; making decisions – estimating, interpreting in order to respond; one right answer
22. 22 DOK Level 2 Examples Identify and summarize the major events, problem, solution, conflicts in literary text
Obtain information using text features
Predict a logical outcome based on information in a reading selection
Classify, organize or estimate
23. 23 DOK Level 2 Examples Organize, represent and compare data
Describe cause-effect of particular events
Compare/contrast people, events, places, concepts
Classify plane and three dimensional figures
24. 24 Level 3: Strategic Thinking and Deeper Reasoning Focus is on need for reasoning and planning in order to respond (e.g., write an essay, apply in new/novel situation); complex and abstract thinking is required; often need to provide support for reasoning or conclusions drawn; more that one “correct”response or approach is often possible
25. 25 DOK Level 3 Examples Explain, generalize, or connect ideas using supporting evidence from the text or from other sources
Analyze interrelationships among elements of the text (plot, subplots, characters, setting)
26. 26 DOK Level 3 Examples Develop a scientific model for a complex idea
Form conclusion from experimental or observational data
Propose and evaluate solutions
Explain, generalize or connect ideas, using supporting evidence from a text or source
27. 27 DOK Level 3 Examples Describe, compare and contrast solutions methods
Solve a multiple-step problem and provide support with a mathematical explanation that justifies the answer
28. 28 Level 4: Extended Reasoning and Thinking Requires complex reasoning, planning, and thinking generally over extended periods of time for the investigation or to complete the multiple steps of the assessment item. Students may be asked to relate concepts within the content area and among other content areas or to real-world applications in new situations.
29. 29 Level 4: Extended Reasoning and Thinking Students may have to devise or select one approach among many alternatives on how the situation can be solved.
30. 30 Level 4: Extended Reasoning and Thinking Extended time period is not a distinguishing factor if the required work is only repetitive and does not require applying significant conceptual understanding and higher-order thinking.
31. 31 Level 4 Extended Reasoning/Thinking Examples Gather, analyze, organize, and interpret information from multiple (print and non print sources) to draft a reasoned report
Conduct an investigation from specifying a problem to designing and carrying out an experiment, to analyzing its data and forming conclusions
32. 32 Level 4 Extended Reasoning/Thinking Examples Analyze and explain multiple perspectives or issues within or across time periods, events, or cultures
Conduct a project that specifies a problem, identifies solution paths, solves the problem, and reports the results
33. 33 Level 4 Extended Reasoning/Thinking Examples Analyzing author’s craft (e.g., style, bias, literary techniques, point of view)
34. 34 Determining DOK: Science Example
35. 35 Next Steps Post DOK annotations for Released Items
Roll out Core Content for Assessment to higher education, districts, and schools
Revise the Program of Studies
Combine Academic Expectations, Core Content for Assessment and Program of Studies into an instructional document for teachers
Spring 2006 – Field test items
36. 36 Table Discussions Select a content area
Determine the DOK for the released open-response and multiple-choice items
Discuss your reasoning
Review the DOK annotations for the released items
Jot down questions you have
37. Proposed High School Graduation Requirements Review of HS Graduation Requirements for the Class of 2010
38. 38 Language Arts 4 credits required
Currently schools move students through English I, II, III, and IV in that order
4 credits required
Courses include the content strands of reading, writing, speaking, listening, observing, inquiry, and using technology as a communication tool.
Language arts shall be taken every year of high school.
39. 39 Mathematics Currently
3 credits required
Courses include Algebra I, Geometry, and one elective
Proposed
3 credits required
Include the content strands of number and computation, geometry and measurement, probability and statistics, and algebraic ideas and the following:
One mathematics course taken every year of high school based on the student's Individual Graduation Plan;
Required courses shall include: Algebra I, Geometry, and Algebra II or a course of equal rigor;
The minimum course for credit shall be Algebra I
40. 40 Social Studies Currently
3 credits
Coursework should incorporate U.S. History, Economics, Government, World Geography, and World Civilization
Recommendation
3 credits
Coursework to include the content strands of historical perspective, geography, economics, government and civics, and culture and society
41. 41 Science Currently
3 credits
Coursework includes life science, physical science, earth and space science
Recommendation
3 credits
Coursework shall incorporate lab-based scientific investigation experiences
Coursework includes the content strands of biological science, physical science, earth and space science, and unifying concepts
42. 42 Health/Physical Education Currently
˝ credit of Health
˝ credit of PE
Recommendation
˝ credit of Health to include the content strands of individual well-being, consumer decision, personal wellness, mental wellness, and community services
˝ credit of PE to include the content strands of personal wellness, psychomotor, and lifetime activity
43. 43 History and Appreciation of Visual and Performing Arts Currently
1 credit
Recommendation
1 credit to include the content strands of arts, dance, music, theatre, and visual arts (or another arts course which incorporates this content) or a standards-based specialized course based on the student’s Individual Graduation Plan
44. 44 Electives Currently
7 elective credits
Recommendation
7 standards-based learning experiences in academic and career interest areas
Of the 7, four (4) must be aligned with the Individual Graduation Plan
45. 45 World Language Currently
No current minimum requirement for high school graduation
Recommendation
Demonstrated proficiency in understanding and communicating in a second language
46. 46 RecommendationDemonstrated proficiency in technology and 21st century literacy Currently
No current minimum requirement for high school graduation
Recommendation
Demonstrated proficiency in technology and 21st century literacy
47. 47 Total Credits Currently
22 credits
Recommendation
22 Credits
48. 48