80 likes | 191 Views
Tucannon Endemic Steelhead – An Integrated Program. picture. Background. ESA listings (Snake, Mid-Columbia) 1999 Hatchery Bi-OP ruled that LSRCP steelhead stocks constituted “jeopardy” to the wild populations (Snake ESU), new broodstocks (localized) should be pursued.
E N D
Background • ESA listings (Snake, Mid-Columbia) • 1999 Hatchery Bi-OP ruled that LSRCP steelhead stocks constituted “jeopardy” to the wild populations (Snake ESU), new broodstocks (localized) should be pursued. • Hatchery production stock (LFH and Wallowa) returns were generally exceeding LSRCP Goal’s. • Started test trapping for endemic broodstock feasibility on the Tucannon and Touchet rivers (1999). • Interim agreements with co-managers • 5-year test to evaluate each before programs were expanded • 50,000 smolt release per year • HGMP development • Reductions in standard production stocks while increasing localized stocks
Genetic Information 99LyonsFerry 04Touchet 05Touchet 03Touchet 02Touchet 05LyonsFerry 01Touchet 00Touchet 02LyonsFerry 98.5 66.0 99Touchet 04LyonsFerry 05Tucannon 00Tucannon 98/99Lyons Ferry 04Tucannon 03Tucannon 02Tucannon 01Tucannon 98/99 Tucannon 0.002
Evaluation of Program Success • Pit tag data • Trap site data
Long-term and Current Objectives? • Long Term • 150,000 total release goal • (50,000 conservation component) • (100,000 marked for harvest) • Current • 75,000 for conservation
Tucannon River Harvest Opportunities • Lyons Ferry Stock Steelhead: Last juvenile released in lower Tucannon River occurred in 2009 (100,000) • Tucannon Stock Steelhead: Release juveniles for harvest?
Facility Impacts • Hatchery improvements / upgrades (LSRCP obligated until BPA picks up conservation component?) • Tucannon -vs- Lyons Ferry Hatchery • Rearing to full term
Questions ? • Could LSRCP or other co-managers helped in this situation to avoid the loss of fishing opportunities? • Will we be able to move forward with the harvest component without an up to date WDFW Steelhead management plan in place?