140 likes | 504 Views
Shipping and Carbon Footprint, methodolgy to for developing a fair and descent system. Haakon Lindstad Marintek, Trondheim - Norway. Gdansk 29.April - 2008. Development of World Energy Consumption 1990 to 2004. The New Enviromental picture of Europe. In March 2007 The Europen leaders
E N D
Shipping and Carbon Footprint, methodolgy to for developing a fair and descent system Haakon Lindstad Marintek, Trondheim - Norway Gdansk 29.April - 2008
The New Enviromental picture of Europe In March 2007 The Europen leaders meet. They agreed that the energy consumption in 2020 shall be reduced by 20 % compared to 1990. “Today companies are held responsible for the environmental impact of the activities within their own part of the value chain. For the future however, the Commission reveals that manufacturers will be held responsible for the green audit of the whole life cycle of the product, from raw material to consumer good” (from ‘cradle to grave’).
The Enviromental Performance area and some of the relevant KPI’s
HOW TO MAKE A MODEL OF THE SEA TRANSPORT MARKET AND THE REAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION
The trend during the last 30 years in shipping is that nearly all the focus has been on developing efficient vessels from 30 000 dwt upwards to 300 000 dwt, while the SSS feet has been more or less neglected. This can be illustrated by the order books for new building versus the active fleet
Logistics and Distribution scenarios Dramatic increase in need for attention to environmental performance required, this could be the result of a large increase in oil price. Change phased in from 2014
What can be done? Future vessels Post 2020 New vessels 2010-2020 Saling vessels
SST.2008.2.1.4 Continental Shipping -Sustainable Shipping • The main idea in this proposal will be to focus on Improvements for vessels in the range 0 – 25 000 dwt since these vessels are the ones which is used in Short sea Shipping. The trend during the last 30 years in shipping is that nearly all the focus has been on developing efficient vessels from 30 000 dwt upwards to 300 000 dwt (the deep sea fleet), while the SSS fleet has more or less been neglected. Due to this the following comparison can be made: • Energy efficiency Deep/sea versus short sea fleet: 1 / 10 + (carbon footprint 3g/tonnkm versus + 50g/tonn km (best versus worst) • Steel weight Deep sea/versus short sea: 1 / 10 + (Best in deep sea fleet payload/ steel weight 10 +/ 1, Short sea 1 / 2 +) • Short sea versus trucking: The trucks have improved their position both regarding Payload/ own weight and regarding CO2 emissions. So unless SSS improves trucks will be far ahead a few years into the future