1 / 8

Assessment Review Committee Report School of Dental Medicine (SoDM)

Assessment Review Committee Report School of Dental Medicine (SoDM). Geralyn Crain, DDS, PhD Assistant Dean for Educational Support and Faculty Development June 4, 2014. 2013 Institutional Planning, Assessment, and Research. Mentoring/Review Process.

edan-bullock
Download Presentation

Assessment Review Committee Report School of Dental Medicine (SoDM)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Assessment Review CommitteeReportSchool of Dental Medicine (SoDM) Geralyn Crain, DDS, PhD Assistant Dean for Educational Support and Faculty Development June 4, 2014 2013 Institutional Planning, Assessment, and Research

  2. Mentoring/Review Process • “Because we are a new school…”: • SoDM curriculum and student assessment are highly “centralized” • Faculty are “fully engaged” in developing & delivering content • Accreditation every two years! • Initial, interim approach: • Assistant Dean and Director of Program Planning & Assessment met with key faculty and administrators to determine initial outcomes, criteria for success, results, etc. • These same 2 individuals + Susan Morrissey = “ARC” 2013 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research

  3. 2012-13 Component Data 2013 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research

  4. Data Visualization 2013 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research

  5. Substantive Changes • Program/Unit: Reorganization of the entire SoDM assessment process • Description of Changes: Establishing Sustainable Working Action Groups (SWAGs) according to groups of related accreditation standards • SWAGs will continue their work between accreditation site visits (every 7 years) • Justification for Changes: • SWAGs most closely related to curriculum will work in place of a “traditional” curriculum committee • SWAGs will focus on ongoing assessment; will be able to draw from SWAGs to form a new ARC 2013 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research

  6. Rubric and Review Process Feedback • Feedback on the rubric and review process. • Susan and Susan were great! • Bottom line: one-on-one “handholding” worked best for us (but is this sustainable for the institution?) • What difficulties were encountered? Looking forward to new format… • SoDM ARC’s process and progress towards addressing comments for “developing” and “acceptable” components received in the 2013 assessment review: • This year: Assistant Dean, Director, and Susan(s) • Future: SWAGs 2013 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research

More Related