1 / 27

Failure Mechanisms in Twill-weave Laminates: FEM Predictions vs. Experiments by

Failure Mechanisms in Twill-weave Laminates: FEM Predictions vs. Experiments by Gianni Nicoletto and Enrica Riva Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale Università di Parma Parma, Italy. COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne, France Jan. 28, 2003.

edana
Download Presentation

Failure Mechanisms in Twill-weave Laminates: FEM Predictions vs. Experiments by

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Failure Mechanisms in Twill-weave Laminates: FEM Predictions vs. Experiments by Gianni Nicoletto and Enrica Riva Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale Università di Parma Parma, Italy COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne, France Jan. 28, 2003

  2. COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva Outline • Introduction e motivation • Related works • Twill-weave laminate chacterization • Finite element modeling • Experimental observations and computational results • Conclusions

  3. COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva Motivation Cooperation with Dallara Automobili F3 racing car IRL racing car Infinity Pro CFRP Chassis

  4. COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva Woven Composites • Definitions • Yarns: bundle of thousands fibers • Warp yarns: parallel to load direction • Fill yarns: perpendicular to load direction • Texture: plain weave, twill weave, etc. • Crimp ratio: degree of yarn curvature • Advantages • With respect to unidirectional laminates: • Easier handling and shaping • Improved impact resistance • Superior out-of-plane stiffness • Balanced in-plane mechanical properties • Cost competitive yarn

  5. COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva Objectives of the work • Develop a finite element-based modeling approach to the mechanics of woven laminate composites. • Compare modeling results and experimental observations. • Analyze the role of texture on mechanical performance. • Develop tools for monitoring damage development in woven laminates.

  6. COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva Related Modeling Work • Analytical approach • T.W. Chu et al (1983 - ) • N.K. Naik et al (1991 - ) • Models, such as mosaic, crimp and bridging models subjected to iso-strain or iso- stress conditions, predict adequately the stiffness of woven laminates. • These models are less satisfactory for strength prediction and micromechanical stress determination. • Convenient approach for texture design. • The plain-weave texture has been mainly considered.

  7. COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva • Finite element approach • J. Whitcomb et al. (1990-1998) • V. Carvelli and C. Poggi (2001) • D. Blackketter et al. (1993) • Computational prediction of the mechanics of woven laminate composites. • The finite element method is used to geometrically model an elementary cell of the woven laminate. • Boundary conditions enforcing stress and strain periodicity are imposed to the representative volume (RV) . • Stress-based damage and stiffness discount technique to model damage progression. • Most studies deal with the plain-weave texture.

  8. COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva Related Experimental Work K. Schulte et al (1988 - ) J.C. Abry et al. (1998) Electrical resistance method applied to unidirectional composites

  9. COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva Material and Experiments 0° direction Fiber: Toray T-300 carbon fibers Fiber diameter: 7 μm Fiber volume fraction Vf: 42% Density ρ: 1.76 g/cm2 Strength su= 3200 MPa Elastic modulus E: 228 GPa Matrix: Epoxy Hexcel 1990S Laminate Lay-up: 8-ply Texture: Twill-weave Yarns: 3k fibers Warp and fill yarns: Identical Laminate thickness: 2.4 mm • Tensile tests according to: ASTM D3039 • Servo-hydraulic testing machine: MTS 810 • Resistance strain gages & Extensometer • Electric resistance measuring apparatus

  10. COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva Geometrical Characterization of Twill-weave Texture Yarn shape: circular arcs Ply stacking: random All dimensions in mm

  11. Twill-weave laminates Stress vs. strain (R-R0)/R0 Stress (MPa) Norm. elect. resistance vs. strain Strain COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champaign G. Nicoletto & E. Riva Tensile Tests and Evolution of Electrical Resistance

  12. Fill yarn Tow yarn Epoxy Fiber fracture Fracture in yarn COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva Damage Observations

  13. Crack in fill yarn Inter-ply delamination Delamination between orthogonal yarns COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva Damage Mechanisms: a Summary • Final longitudinal fiber fracture is preceeded by a number of mechanisms. • Matrix cracks develop in fill yarns. • Delamination occurs between orthogonal yarns. • Inter-ply delamination is observed

  14. COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva Homogeneization Method for Composite Materials • Assumption of periodic microstructures which can be represented by unit cells • Asymptotic expansion of all variables and the average technique to determine the homogeneized (macroscopic) material properties and constitutive relations of composite materials • Prediction of microscopic fields of deformation inside the unit cell through the localization process

  15. COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva Texture and Representative Volume RV • Material models: • Yarn: transverse isotropic, linear elastic • Matrix: linear elastic Twill-weave RV

  16. COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva Finite Element Modeling of RV • Parametric geometrical model (I-DEAS) • Finite element code (ABAQUS) • Convergence study • Optimized model: > 30000 elements • Geometric nonlinearity included • Progressive damage evolution routine in FORTRAN

  17. COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva Boundary conditions on RV Free surface Carvelli & Poggi (2001) where u(x) is the displacement field in the RV u0 is a rigid displacement of the RV W is a small rigid rotation of RV E is the average strain (macroscopic) of RV ũ(x) is a periodic displacement associated to microscopic strain field within RV Post, Han and Ifju (1994)

  18. COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva Damage Modes for Fiber Yarn M. Zako et al (2003)

  19. COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva Modeling Damage Development Discount method Blackketter et al (1993) • Iterative procedure. • Evaluation at each integration point. • Normal stress criterion for failure. • Elastic modulus is reduced to 1/10 of its initial value. • Role of time step and mesh size.

  20. Plain weave Thick laminate Twill weave Lamina COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva Effect of Texture on Longitudinal Stiffness • Strong influence of crimp ratio on stiffness. • Good correlation with experimental results. • A thick laminate is stiffer than a single lamina. • At high crimp ratios the twill-weave is stiffer than the plain- weave.

  21. COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva Effect of Crimp Ratio on Stress-Strain Curve • Strong influence of crimp ratio on stress-strain curve. • Good correlation with experimental results. • Low crimp ratio shows a trend linear to failure. • Influence of computational parameters.

  22. COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva d c b a Stresses and Damage Step a • The critical stress is perpendicular to the fill yarn surface. • The wedge elements of the straight portion of the fill yarns fail first. • Initial damage occurs near the fill yarns. • The critical stress is representative of damage initiation in the matrix.

  23. COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva d c b a Stresses and Damage Step b • The critical stress direction does not change. It is perpendicular to the fill yarn surface. • Damage continues in the fill yarns. • Damage now involves the brick elements next to the wedge elements. • The damage spreads into the matrix.

  24. COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva d c b a Stresses and Damage Step c • The wedge elements, where the two perpendicular yarns are close to each other, fail. • Fiber failure occurs in the fill yarn. • Failure occurs where the yarn is curved to the maximum.

  25. COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva d c b a Stresses and Damage Step d • Failure extends to the neighboring brick elements up to final catastrophic collapse. • In this final stage different failure modes are activated such as transverse and longitudinal shear, and transverse direct stress.

  26. Crack in fill yarn Inter-ply delamination Delamination between orthogonal yarns Computational COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva Qualitative Correlation Experimental

  27. COMPTEST 2003 Chalons en Champagne G. Nicoletto & E. Riva Conclusions • Optical inspection of a twill-weave laminate during tensile testing showed different damage mechanisms. • Finite element modelling of an appropriate RV provided the macroscopic stress-strain relation of a woven laminate that were compared to experimental results. • The finite element model of the RV provided the microscopic stresses and strains within matrix and reinforcements. • An iterative procedure based on a damage routine has been developed to simulate damage evolution. • A first correlation between experimental observations and computed damage evolution in a twill-weave laminate is encouraging.

More Related