1 / 43

GLP-1 and use with insulin

GLP-1 and use with insulin. Giorgio Sesti. University “Magna Graecia” of Catanzaro. T2DM anti- hyperglycaemic therapy : general recommendations. Diabetes Care 2012;35:1364-1379; Diabetologia 2012; 55:1577-1596. T2DM anti- hyperglycaemic therapy : general recommendations.

edita
Download Presentation

GLP-1 and use with insulin

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. GLP-1 and use with insulin Giorgio Sesti University “Magna Graecia” of Catanzaro

  2. T2DM anti-hyperglycaemic therapy: general recommendations Diabetes Care 2012;35:1364-1379; Diabetologia 2012;55:1577-1596.

  3. T2DM anti-hyperglycaemic therapy: general recommendations Diabetes Care 2012;35:1364-1379; Diabetologia 2012;55:1577-1596.

  4. Why treating with a combination of a glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP‑1) receptor agonist and long-acting insulin ?

  5. Mean relative β-cell volume in obese non-diabetic, IFG and diabetic subjects and lean subjects -50% β-cell volume (%) -63% Obese Lean Butler et al. Diabetes2003’52:102-110.

  6. β-cell apoptosis was 3- fold increased in obese with type 2 diabetes and 10-fold increased in lean with type 2 diabetes vs. their respective control groups (P <0.05) (P <0.05) Butler, A. et al Diabetes 52: 102-110, 2003 Butler AE et al. Diabetes 52:102–110,2003

  7. Schematic view of mechanisms of action of GLP‑1 analogues and long-acting insulin with respect to the pathophysiological phenotype of T2DM Nauck & Meier. J Nat Rev Endocrinol 2011;7:193-195. *Shown in rodents or in vitro modelsonly.

  8. Liraglutide inhibits beta-cell apoptosis in isolated neo-natal rat islets Liraglutide GLP-1 Fatty-acid-induced apoptosis in neo-natal rat islets Cytokine-induced apoptosis 100 100 * * * * * 75 75 * ** * Apoptotic b-cells (% of control) ** * 50 50 25 25 ** ** ND ND 0 0 0 1 10 100 1000 0 1 10 100 1000 Compound (nM) Compound (nM) *p < 0.01, **p < 0.005 Bregenholt et al. BiochemBiophys Res Commun 330: 577–584, 2005

  9. Over time, glycaemic control deteriorates UKPDS ADOPT 9.0 Conventional 8.0 Glibenclamide Rosiglitazone Metformin Glibenclamide Metformin 8.5 Insulin 7.5 8.0 7.5 Median HbA1c (%) 7.0 7.0 Recommended treatment target ≤7.0% 6.5 Rosiglitazone vs. metformin–0.13 (–0.22 to –0.05), p=0.002 Rosiglitazone vs. glibenclamide–0.42 (–0.50 to –0.33), p<0.001 6.5 6.0 6.0 6.2% – upper limit of normal range 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 Time (years) Years from randomisation UKPDS 34. Lancet 1998:352:854–865 Kahn et al. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2427–43

  10. β-cell function progressively declines –5 –4 –3 –2 –1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 UKPDS ADOPT Diabetes diagnosis 100 Treatment difference (95% CI) Rosiglitazone vs. metformin, 5.8 (1.9 to 9.8); p=0.003 Rosiglitazone vs. glyburide, -0.8 (-4.7 to 3.1)); p=0.67 100 80 90 60 -cell function (%, HOMA) 80 β-cell function (%) 40 70 Sulphonylurea (n=511) Annualised slope (95% CI) 20 Diet (n=110) Rosiglitazone: -2.0 (-2.6 to -1.3) Metformin (n=159) Metformin: -3.1 (-3.8 to -2.5) 60 Extrapolation of β-cell function prior to diagnosis Glyburide: -6.1 (-6.8 to -5.4) 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 Time (years) Years from diagnosis UKPDS 16. Diabetes1995;44:1249-1258; Lebovitz1999;7:139-153. Kahn et al. N Engl J Med2006;355:2427-2443.

  11. Schematic view of mechanisms of action of GLP‑1 analogues and long-acting insulin with respect to the pathophysiological phenotype of T2DM Nauck & Meier. J Nat Rev Endocrinol 2011;7:193-195. *Shown in rodents or in vitro modelsonly.

  12. Liraglutide increased first-phase insulin secretion p=0.05 20 p<0.02 First-phase insulin secretion Meanchange vs.baseline(pmol/l/hr) 15 10 5 0 0.65 mg/day(n=5) 1.25 mg/day(n=9) 1.90 mg/day (n=6) Placebo(n=5) Vilsbøllet al. Diabet Med2008;25:152-156.

  13. Insulin and Glucagon Dynamics in Response to Meals Are Abnormal in Type 2 Diabetes 360 Meal 330 300 Glucose (mg%) 270 Type 2 diabetes 240 Normals 110 80 120 90 Insulin (μ/ml) 60 30 Delayed/depressed insulin response 140 0 130 Non-suppressed glucagon 120 110 Glucagon (μIμ/ml) 100 90 (minutes) -60 0 60 120 180 240 Normals, n=11; Type 2 diabetes, n=12. Muller WA et al. N Engl J Med. 283:109–115, 1970.

  14. Excessive hepatic glucose production Pancreatic cells: -cell -cell -cell Glucagon secretion Hepatic glucose production Insulin secretion

  15. Schematic view of mechanisms of action of GLP‑1 analogues and long-acting insulin with respect to the pathophysiological phenotype of T2DM Nauck & Meier. J Nat Rev Endocrinol 2011;7:193-195. *Shown in rodents or in vitro modelsonly.

  16. Liraglutide significantly reduced the 24-h AUC of glucagon in T2DM Placebo Liraglutide Degn KB et al. Diabetes 53:1187–1194, 2004

  17. Change in FPG over time: LEAD-3 2-year completers 8.54 mmol/l FPG (mmol/l) 7.58 mmol/l 7.45 mmol/l 0 Observed mean±2SE, no imputation for missing values. Garber et al. Diabetes ObesMetab2011;13:348-356.

  18. Gastric emptying rate is an important determinant of PPG in early Type 2 Diabetes Jones KL, et al. J Nucl Med 37:1643-1648, 1996

  19. Schematic view of mechanisms of action of GLP‑1 analogues and long-acting insulin with respect to the pathophysiological phenotype of T2DM Nauck & Meier. J Nat Rev Endocrinol 2011;7:193-195. *Shown in rodents or in vitro modelsonly.

  20. Gastric emptying is inhibited in a dose-dependent manner by GLP‑1 administration Meier JJet al. J. Clin. Endocrinol. 88: 2716–2725, 2003

  21. PPG profile of liraglutide 1.8 mg (baseline corrected) 5 Liraglutide 1.8 mg Placebo 4 3 2 Change from baseline (mmol/l) 1 0 -1 3.0 4.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.5 4.5 5.0 -0.5 Time since start of meal (hours) Flint et al. Adv Ther 2011;28:213-226.

  22. GLP-1 action on the GI and central nervous systems Gastric emptying Satiety GLP-1 Energy intake

  23. Liraglutide increases anorectic neurotransmitter CART mRNA expression and prevents fasting induced orexigenic NPY mRNA expression in rats CART P<0.05 NPY P<0.05 2.5 2.5 p<0.05 p<0.05 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.5 Gene expression (arbitrary units) Gene expression (arbitrary units) 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 • In the arcuate nucleus, mRNA expression of the anorectic neurotransmitter CART was significantly increased following liraglutide treatment. • Liraglutide prevented the increase in orexigenicNPY mRNA seen in weight-matched (food-restricted) rats. 0 0 Vehicle Liraglutide Weight-matched Vehicle Liraglutide Weight-matched Vrang et al. Diabetes 59 (Suppl 1) 583 P, 2010

  24. Change in body weight over time — 2-year completers of LEAD-3 +1.0 kg Change in body weight (kg) -2.3 kg -2.8 kg Time (weeks) Observed mean±2SE (standard error), no imputation for missing values Garber et al. Diabetes ObesMetab2011;13:348–56 (LEAD-3 2-year extension)

  25. Liraglutide vs. sitagliptin for type 2 diabetes patients who did not have adequate glycaemic control with metformin: Change in body weight –0.96 kg –2.86 kg –3.38 kg Pratley RE et al. Lancet 375: 1447–1456, 2010

  26. Dose–response relationships for the effects of GLP-1 Holst JJ et al Trends in Mol Med 2008

  27. Network meta-analysis of pairwise comparisons of randomized controlled trials evaluating the use of anti-hyperglycemic agents in addition to metformin vs. placebo: At least one event of overall hypoglycaemia (odds ratio) At least one event of overall hypoglycaemia (odds ratio) SU Glinides TZDs Acarbose DPP-4 GLP-1 BasalBiphasic inhibitorsagonistsinsulininsulin Liu S-C et al. Diabetes Obes and Metab 14: 810–820, 2012

  28. The combination of basal insulin and GLP‑1-based therapies addresses complimentary targets such as: • Fasting and pre-prandial glucose by suppressing hepatic glucose production and improving β-cell function • Post-prandial glucose by decelerating gastric emptying • …and may help alleviate some of the problems of insulin therapy: • Weight gain • Hypoglycaemia • Elevated doses of insulin

  29. Clinical outcomes • In clinical practice, combination therapy could arise: • By adding insulin to pre-existing GLP-1RA therapy • By adding GLP-1RAs to established insulin therapy

  30. DeVrieset al. Diabetes Care 2012;35:1446-1454.

  31. Trial design Randomisation Run-in period: 12 weeks Randomised period: 26 weeks Adults 18–80 years with T2DM HbA1c: 7.0–10.0% (MET only) 7.0–8.5% (MET + SU) MET (≥1500 mg) or MET (≥1500 mg) + SU (≤50% max. dose) for ≥3 months Open-label study with two randomised and one non-randomised treatment arm Conducted in 7 European countries, Canadaand the US HbA1c <7.0% Observational group 61%of run-in completers had HbA1c <7.0% Liraglutide 1.8 mg (n=498) Liraglutide 1.8 mg HbA1c ≥7.0% (1:1 randomisation) Randomised treatment group IDet + liraglutide 1.8 mg (n=162) Liraglutide 1.2 mg 1 week Liraglutide 0.6 mg 1 week 39%of run-in completers had HbA1c ≥7.0% Randomised control group Liraglutide 1.8 mg (n=161) Metformin ≥1500 mg/day; SU discontinued IDet, insulin detemir; MET, metformin; SU, sulphonylurea DeVrieset al. Diabetes Care 2012;35:1446-1454.

  32. Mean change in HbA1c by week Run-in (Weeks -12 to 0) Randomised period (Weeks 0 to 26) Time (weeks) RC: -0.66 RT: -0.60 Change in HbA1c (%) (final value 7.5) RC: -0.76 (final value 7.1) RT: -1.13 (final value 6.6) O: -1.12 RC: 8.29 RT: 8.22 O: 7.72 O: -1.34 Mean (2SE); data are from the FAS, no imputation. DeVrieset al. Diabetes Care 2012;35:1446-1454.

  33. Seven-point glucose profiles Randomisation (Week 0) Week 26 Randomised control group (metformin+liraglutide1.8 mg) Randomised control group (metformin+liraglutide1.8 mg) Randomised treatment group (metformin+IDet+liraglutide1.8 mg) Randomised treatment group (metformin+IDet+liraglutide1.8 mg) Self-measured plasma glucose (mmol/l) p=0.0003 p=0.0244 p=0.0141 0 Before breakfast 90 min after breakfast Before lunch 90 min after lunch Before dinner 90 min after dinner Bedtime Mean (2SE); data are from the FAS, no imputation. p-values are for treatment differences in changes from randomisation (Week 0) for the meal (FAS LOCF) DeVrieset al. Diabetes Care 2012;35:1446-1454.

  34. Mean body weight change by week Run-in (Weeks −12 to 0) Randomised period (Weeks 0 to 26) Time (weeks) RC: 3.46 RT: 3.53 Change in body weight (kg) RT: 4.00 Baseline: RC: 98.6 RT: 99.5 O: 99.0 RC: 4.74 O: 4.78 O: 4.35 Mean (2SE); data are from the FAS, no imputation. DeVrieset al. Diabetes Care 2012;35:1446-1454.

  35. Clinical outcomes • In clinical practice, combination therapy could arise: • By adding insulin to pre-existing GLP-1RA therapy • By adding GLP-1RAs to established insulin therapy

  36. Buseet al. Ann Intern Med 2011;154:103-112.

  37. Study design Randomisation Screening Insulin Titration Endpoint Exenatide Exenatide 5 µg BID 10 µg BID * * + + Insulin glargine + OAMs continued throughout study Placebo Placebo (volume equivalent) (volume equivalent) T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T Visit 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 10 10 10 11 11 11 12 12 12 13 13 13 13 13 Week of 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 6 6 6 6 6 8 8 8 10 10 10 10 14 14 14 18 18 18 22 22 22 26 26 26 30 30 30 30 30 − treatment BID, twice daily (≤60 min before morning and evening meals); FPG, fasting plasma glucose; OAMs, oral antihyperglycaemic medications (metformin and/or pioglitazone); T, telephone call. aInsulintitrated to FPG of <5.6 mmol/l 5 weeks after randomisation and throughout remainder of study using "Treat to Target" algorithm adapted from Riddle et al. Diabetes Care2003;26(11):3080-3086. bValuesfor at least 1 FPG since the last assessment. cBasedon the average of FPGs during the last 3 to 7 days. Note: The increase in the total daily dose should not exceed more than 10 U/day or 10% of the current total daily dose, whichever is greater. Buseet al. Ann Intern Med 2011;154:103-112.

  38. HbA1c reduction: patients taking exenatide or placebo with insulin glargine Difference in HbA1c at 30 weeks: -0.69% (95% CI -0.93 to -0.46%; p<0.001) Data are mean±95% CI. Buseet al. Ann Intern Med 2011;154:103-112.

  39. Body weight change: patients taking exenatide or placebo with insulin glargine Body weight change over 30 weeks (p<0.001; all time points) Data are mean±95% CI. Buseet al. Ann Intern Med 2011;154:103-112.

  40. Hypoglycaemic events Insulin glargine+exenatide Insulin glargine+placebo Proportion of patients experiencing hypoglycaemia (%) Minor Minor nocturnal Major Buseet al. Ann Intern Med 2011;154:103-112.

  41. Increase insulin dosage from baseline was greater in the placebo group Between-group Difference -6.5 (95% CI 12.3 to 0.8); p=0.030 Change in insulin dose (U/d) Insulin glargine+exenatide Insulin glargine+placebo Buse et al. Ann Intern Med 154:103-112, 2011

  42. Overall conclusions • Adding basal insulin to pre-existing GLP-1RA therapy or adding GLP-1RAs to established insulin therapy may help improve glycaemic control and reduce glycaemic excursions • Improvement in HbA1c by combining GLP-1RAs with insulin is associated with: • Weight loss • No increased risk of hypoglycaemia • Reduction in insulin doses

  43. THANK YOU ! Sesti lecture

More Related