260 likes | 448 Views
C 70 and C 60 colliding with slow highly charged ions – a comparison. Henrik Cederquist, Physics Department, Stockholm University. Atomic Physics SU : H. Zettergren, H. T. Schmidt, J. Jensen. and H. Cederquist. CEA Ganil : B. Huber, and B. Manil.
E N D
C70 and C60 colliding with slow highly charged ions – a comparison Henrik Cederquist, Physics Department, Stockholm University Atomic Physics SU: H. Zettergren, H. T. Schmidt, J. Jensen and H. Cederquist CEA Ganil: B. Huber, and B. Manil Aarhus University: S. Tomita, S.B. Nielsen, J. Rangama, and P. Hvelplund C60 C70 4th Annual LEIF Meeting Belfast, June 29, 2003
Part of the team (in Stockholm in December 2002): J. Jensen S. Tomita P. Hvelplund S.B. Nielsen J. Rangama H. Cederquist Missing in the picture: H. Zettergren, H.T. Schmidt, and B. Huber
Projectiles: Targets: Xe8+ , Xe16+ , Xe23+ (v= 0.07, 0.10, 0.12 v0) C60, C70 (T=600 °C) Important collision features: A(q-s)+ Hollow ions and atoms E0+E Aq+ E0 C70r+
Similarities and differences in ion-induced fragmentation of C60 and C70 C60 C70 Charge stability limits Kinetic Energy Releases (KER) Fission barriers Competition asymmetric fission/evaporation
Fragmentation modes of excited C60 and C70: Neutral evaporation of small fragments: C60 C60r+C60-2mr+ + C2m (m=1,2,3,4…) C70r+ C70-2mr+ + C2m (m=1,2,3,4…) Asymmetric fission: C70 C60r+C60-2m(r-1)+ + C2m +(m=1,2,3,4…) C70r+ C70-2m(r-1)+ + C2m +(m=1,2,3,4…) Multifragmentation: C60r+many small fragments in low charge states C70r+ many small fragments in low charge states
The experimental technique: Collimated C70 Jet Cylindrical analyzer Xe23+ Vex 0 V -100 V TRIG V1 time-of-flight V2 V3 PSD1 START STOP PSD2 Multi-hit TDC 22+ 21+ C705+ C685+ time-of-flight
(a) Intensity (arb. units) (b) m/q (units of C) Xe8+ - C70 (24 keV) Xe8+ - C60 (24 keV) The C70 powder has high purity (99.4 %)
Xe23+ + C70 Xe (23-s)+ + C70r+ +... Xe23+ + C60 Xe (23-s)+ + C60r+ +... Intensity (arb. units) m/q (units of C)
Relative cross sections for producing intact C70r+ and C60r+ ions in Xe23+-C60 and Xe23+- C70 collisions. C60r+ C70r+
Maximum fullerene charges and Similarities in the fragmentation of C60 and C70 ions
Xe23+ + C70 Xe 20+ + C70r+ +... Light fragments: GATED! Xe23+ + C60 Xe 20+ + C60r+ +... Intensity (arb. units) C709+ GATED! + 2+ C C 15 8 + 7+ C + C 6+ C 9+ C C + 3 C 70 5 70 70 6 8+ C + C Intensity (arb. units) 70 + C 11 2+ C 4 11 4 6 8 10 12 m/q (units of C)
Heavy fragments: 4+ 3+ 5+ C C C 70 70 70 5+ C Xe23+ + C70 Xe 21+ + C70r+ +... 68 4+ 66 C 5+ C 70 68 Xe8+ + C70 Xe 6+ + C70r+ +... 70 3+ C 60 5+ 6+ C C 68 70 10 20 4+ 3+ 5+ C 6+ C C C 60 60 7+ 60 60 C 60 Xe23+ + C60 Xe 21+ + C60r+ +... 56 58 4+ 5+ 3+ C C C 60 60 60 Xe8+ + C60 Xe 6+ + C60r+ +... 6+ C 60 10 20
C68(r-1)+ C58(r-1)+ C2+ C2+ Similarities in kinetic energy releases:
Kinetik energy releases – calibration and resolution Collimator Ion beam Ion beam Warm Xe target (high v(Xe)) ’Cold’ C60-jet (low v(C60)) Xe+ Detector Detector C60+ ~ 40 meV ~ 3 meV Energy resolution Energy calibration
Kinetic Energy Releases (KER’s) for C60r+ asymmetric fission – comparison with other measurements 16 C60r+ C58(r-1)+ + C2+ 17+ Present expt. data for Xe 12 KER’s are insensitive to production method! MIKE Scheier et al., 8 Kinetic Energy Release (eV) MIKE Senn et al., 4 Chen et al., TOF TOF Tomita et al., 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Charge of final fragment C 58
Kinetic Energy Releases for C70r+ asymmetric fission – comparison with other measurements (Xe16+ and Xe23+ projectiles) C70 KER’s are similar for Xe23+ and Xe16+!
C68(r-1)+ C58(r-1)+ C2+ C2+ Model: Comparisons Kinetic Energy Releases C60/C70 C70 data: 25 23+ Present data Xe 16+ Present data Xe 20 15 Kinetic Energy Release (eV) U C60 data: 10 23+ Xe , C 60 5 et al. Cederquist , C 60 R 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Initial charge of C /C , r 70 60
Xe23+ + C70 Xe 21+ + C70r+ +... C684+ C685+ C704+ C705+ Xe8+ + C70 Xe 6+ + C70r+ +... C685+ C705+ C704+ C684+ Surprising no such difference for the C60 target!
Xe23+ + C70 Xe 21+ +... Xe8+ + C70 Xe 6+ +... 5+ 5+ C C 68 68 5+ 5+ C C 70 70 200 250 300 200 250 300 Same comparison - projected distributions:
Data for Xe8+ impact! Note!!
4th Annual LEIF Meeting Belfast, June 29, 2003 Conclusions: The relative cross sections for production of intact C60r+ and C70r+ ions are almost identical as functions of r for a given projectile. The fragmentation spectra are very similar for C70 and C60 indicating similar roles played by asymmetric fission and evaporation – exception: Enhanced production of C60 from C70 Measured Kinetic Energy Releases (KER) for asymmetric fission C70r+ C68(r-1)+ + C2+ are significantly lower than those reported earlier in the literature. KER’s are close for C60 and C70 ionized by Xe23+ - in agreement with the fission process being controlled by a barrier Fission barriers and stability limits are similar for C60 and C70 C70 in intermediate charge states fission after collisions with Xe16+ or Xe23+ but evaporate after collisions with Xe8+ - new phenomena not observed with C60!
Look at the raw data again C60 and C70 really behaves differently with Xe8+ projectiles: Xe8+ + C70 / C60 Xe6+ + C70r+ / C60r+ +... C685+ C705+ C704+ C684+ C604+ C605+ C585+ C584+ Note!
There are some differences even with Xe23+ projectiles: Xe23+ + C70 / C60 Xe21+ + C70r+ / C60r+ +... C684+ C685+ C704+ C705+ C584+ C585+ C604+ C605+
Fission barriers are lower for C70r+ than for C60r+ thus Activation energies for neutral C2-emission must be lower for C70r+ than for C60r+ k=r Ea(C60r+) = Ea(C60) + (Ik(C58)-Ik(C60) ) k=1 k=r Ea(C70r+) = Ea(C70) + (Ik(C68)-Ik(C70) ) k=1 C70 C60