210 likes | 226 Views
Primary Health Care: international experiences & ‘best practices’. Health Care Neighbourhoods and Integrated Care Implications for the Development of Patient Centred Medical and Health Care Homes Sydney, December 01 2016. Professor Chris van Weel Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands
E N D
Primary Health Care: international experiences & ‘best practices’ Health Care Neighbourhoods and Integrated Care Implications for the Development of Patient Centred Medical and Health Care Homes Sydney, December 01 2016 Professor Chris van Weel Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands Australian National University
International concerns driving health reforms and drive primary health care policy • Access • Equity – ressponsiveness to highest need • Affordability • Financial and Societal Terms • Aging and Chrinic Health Problems • Availability • (Community based) Facilities • Discipline-mixture and their professional Training • Appropriateness • Quality & Safety • Autonomy, self-reliance • Inter-sectorial – socio-economic well-being • Accountability • From reactive to pro-active approach
Policy Priorities • Primary Health Care • Since 1941-1948 NL, UK • WHO Alma Ata 1978 • WHO WHR 2008 ‘primary health care now more than ever’ • Universal Health Coverage • Related UN Sustainable Development Goals • Address financial burden of poor health • WHO: to be realised through PHC – need of ‘PHC-literacy’ • Cost-effectiveness • Avoidance of waste of resources • Co-ordination within health system and with other sectors • Multi-disciplinary teams, community centers, PCMH
Reason: primary health care More primary care • Better health population, lower healthcare costs • Higher life expectancy • Better diagnosis, treatment diseases that matter Illness - person with illness - population Barbara Starfield Is Primary Care Essential? Lancet 1994
Reform: move health care intothe community Ecology of Medical Care White et all, NEJM 1961 Green et all, NEJM 2001 Johansen et al NEJM 2016 <=
Community-based PHCParadigm Shift: • PHC • Person andpopulation (people) centered • Continuity, comprehensiveness, co-ordination • Social Context, Co-multimorbidity • Evidence-based Health Policy • Health Systems, Education, Research • Disease-specificity in diagnosis treatment and management
Role, Function, Values Primary Health Care* ‘First’ contact All health problems, all individuals, all stages No pre-selection, undifferentiated Diagnostic and understanding Selectively used contacts Reasons for contact as important as the health problem Needs, expectations, equity Autonomy and self-efficacy Community – population basis Community specific, needs, social determinants health Continuity over time Variety of (health) problems in same individual Personal understanding determines proceeding Trust * WoncaEurope. Definition of the general practitioner/family physician. http://www.woncaeurope.org/sites/default/files/documents/Definition%20EURACTshort%20version%20revised%202011.pdf
From general practice to primary health care* From WHO Resolution WHA 62.12. 2009 Primary health care, including health system strengthening. Professionals: • Nurses, Midwifes, Family Physicians, Allied Health Professionals • The team * WHO: Resolution WHA 62.12. Primary health care, including health system strengthening. In: Sixty-second World Health Assembly, Geneva, 18–22 May 2009. Resolutions and decisions, and annexes. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009:16–19 (WHA62/2009/REC/1).
Community basedprimary health care PHC team / Patient-centeredmedical home Based of shared values andthecompetenceto act on it White et all, NEJM 1961 Green et all, NEJM 2001 Johansen et al NEJM 2016 <=
Determinants of effective Primary Health Care Structure health care • Level 1. Primary Health Care Structure • Access to Health Care through PHC • Specialist, Hospital Care throughReferral • Level 2. Personal Relation • Listing of Patientswith a GP/FP • Capitationpayment as main source financing • Level 3. Community relation • Community Health Centres • Multidisciplinary teams • Level 4. Intersectorialstructure • Socialdeterminants of health • Integrating health and welfare
Experiences from The Netherlands • 1941 Sick Fund Decree – affordable health care, population needs, equity • ‘Primary health care structure’, with patients listed with a GP, capitation payment • 1956 DCGP – paradigm shift, person centeredness of health care • Start of academicdevelopment • 1968 Founding University Departments, chairs general practice, all schools • Teaching, Specialty Training (1973), Research • 1975 White Paper ‘Primary Health Care’ population/community centeredness • Support multidisciplinary health centres • Rewarding of pro-active planning of community health care • 1986 GP Research, DCGP Quality program – EBM, primary-hospital care • Research for practice, guideline program • Individual and practice audit & accreditation • 2006 Introduction mandatory for-profit health insurance – innovative initiatives • Support for collaborative partnerships public health – PHC – hospital care • Inter-sectorial collaboration – ‘community diagnosis’ – social determinants of health • Strong focus on public health – primary health care interaction
Community Based Primary Health Care Practices Academic Network Radboud University Nijmegen • Variety settings, communities • Real life problems, challenges • Experience, empirism • Relation with PHC field
Primary health care teams NL:‘community based’ related to defined ‘practice population’ GPacknowledging primary health care leadershipPatient Centered Medical Home US:‘individual patient’ centeredaimed to impose co-ordination of care that was not availabledirected at the interface hospital – primary health care
Complexity of primary care: in-depth context, in-breadth health problems All Diseases All Patients Groups All Stages • Focus on: • Person • Family • Community • Takinginto account Social-culturalvalues • Werking from: • Direct access • In time (continuity) • Relation of trust
From concept to real life PHC:The International Implementation Research Network in Primary Care • Building international collaboration for PHC policy implementation • Exchanges and fora for critical appraisal of current practice sand needs • Comparative outcome studies • Strategy Development to Involve all stakeholders (patients, professionals, policy makers, researchers) • Advice and training • Collaborate with international bodies (WHO; WONCA; NAPCRG) • Collect evidence and experience from a broad range of countries
Activities until now • Conferences • NAPCRG pre-conferences 2013, 2014, 2015 • WONCA AP Conference 2015 • WONCA SA Conference 2016 • WONCA World Conference 2016 • NAPCRG Workshop 2016 • Publications • Annals Family Medicine 2015 http://www.annfammed.org/content/13/1/86.full.pdf+html • Annals Family Medicine 2016 http://www.annfammed.org/content/14/3/279.full.pdf+html • Br J Gen Pract2016 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X685513 • BMJ Global Health 2016;1:e000057. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2016000057
Countries Profiled and documented • Asia Pacific • China – Hong Kong • China – Shanghai • Japan • Singapore • South Korea • Taiwan • Latin America • Chili • Uruguay • Mexico • South Asia • Bangladesh • India • Nepal • Pakistan • Sri Lanka
Summary of Findings Common Themes • Concerns of equity – Universal Health Coverage • Limited understanding of PHC (‘Black Box’), UHC and PHC as separate issues • Monitoring health reformsignores markers of PHC (f.e. continuity; comprehensiveness) • Continuation of disease-centered care • Reforms: co-ordinated top-down policy and bottom-up implementation action • But are oftendisconnected • Importance of Leadershipfromprimary health care; but: • Specialty training, andrestrictiontopractice PHC forcertified PHC specialists • Community-based teaching, research & development • Turf battles of hospitalspecialists, academic centers • Context-specific • Resistanceto ‘health insurance’ (India) • Restrictionstopracticemedicineoutsidehospital setting (South Korea) • Victim of earliersuccesslimited PHC (Sri Lanka)
Barriers in implementing PHC • Financing models based on the delivery of (often disease-specific) items of service, creating perverse incentives; • Fragmentation of services of providers working in isolation, disrupting continuity and integration of care; • Dis-balance between community based primary care and centralised hospital facilities with a ‘brain drain’ of professionals towards hospital care; • Insufficient professional training and career opportunities in the community setting; • Poor organisation of communities and service users to engage in and co-design local primary health care development and implementation and perform their role as stakeholders.
Importance to monitor PHC Values in health reforms, to secure true changeContinuity, co-ordination, comprehensiveness of care, empowerment of individuals and communities, trustPrimary health care literacy
Plans coming years ContinuedAdvocacyPHC • Corefunction in any health system • Importance of bottom-up implementation of top-down policy • Key factor in realisingaffordable, safe effectiive Universal Health Coverage Comparativecountries- studies • Role, function Community basedprimary health care • Fromphysicianpracticestomultidisciplinary teams • Involvement – participation of patients – community leaders • Focus on SocialDeterminants of Health, intersectorial • Use of ppt template Workshop 2018 WONCA World Conference Seoul • In collaborationwithWHO