200 likes | 339 Views
Proximity Searching in High Dimensional Spaces with a Proximity Preserving Order. Edgar Ch ávez Karina Figueroa Gonzalo Navarro. UNIVERSIDAD DE CHILE, CHILE. UNIVERSIDAD MICHOACANA, MEXICO. Content. About the problem Basic concepts Previous work Our technique Experiments
E N D
Proximity Searching in High Dimensional Spaces with a Proximity Preserving Order Edgar Chávez Karina Figueroa Gonzalo Navarro UNIVERSIDAD DE CHILE, CHILE UNIVERSIDAD MICHOACANA, MEXICO
Content • About the problem • Basic concepts • Previous work • Our technique • Experiments • Conclusion and future wok
Huge Database Expensive distance Proximity Searching • Exact searching is not possible
Applications • Retrieval Information • Classification • People finder through the web • Clustering • Currently used on • Classification of Spider’s web • Face recognition on Chilean’s Web
Extraction of characteristics Complex objects Index Problems (metric spaces) Huge databases High dimension Memory limited
Terminology • Queries • Range query • K nearest neighbor • Properties • Symmetry • Strict possitiveness • Triangle inequality
Pivot based Partition based Pivot distance q Previous work Range query
Pivot based Partition based q centro Previous work
Permutant u Our techniquePermutation P1 p2 P4 P6 IDEA p5 p3
Our technique • Exact matching elements have the same permutation • Similar elements must have a similar permutation (we guess) • Spearman footrule metric • Measures the similarity of the permutations • Promissority elements first
Spearman Footrule metricExample 3-1, 6 - 2, 3-2, 4-1, 5-5, 6-4 Difference of positions
p3,p1,p2 Permutant p1 p3 p2,p1,p3 p2 p2,p3,p1 p3,p2,p1 Searching process (1a. part)Preprocessing time
Permutant q Searching process (2a. part)Query time Sorting elements by Spearman Footrule metric p2,p1,p3 p2,p3,p1 ….. ….. p3,p1,p2 p3,p1,p2 p1 p3 p2,p1,p3 p2 p2,p1,p3 p2,p3,p1 p3,p2,p1
93% retrieved, comparing 10% of database 90% retrieved, comparing 60% of database Pivot based algorithm Retrieved 48% Experiments %retrieved
100% retrieved, comparing 15% of database 100% retrieved, comparing 90% of database Experiments up to 84% less work %retrieved
Metric algorithms are using one of them How good is our prediction? Dimension 256, using 256 pivots retrieved Percentage of the database compared
Similarities between permutations Almost the same value
Conclusion • A new probabilistic algorithm for proximity searching in metric space. • Our technique is based on permutations. • Close elements will have similar permutations. • This technique is the fastest known algorithm for high dimension. • Permutations are good predictor
Future Work • Can Non-metric spaces be tackled with this technique? • Approximated all K Nearest neighbor algorithm. • Improving other metric indexes.
Thank you UNIVERSIDAD MICHOACANA, MEXICO UNIVERSIDAD DE CHILE, CHILE Kfiguero@dcc.uchile.cl