1 / 3

PerkinElmer LAS

PerkinElmer LAS. Result Messaging and Demographics. March 21st, 2012. Results Messaging ( RM ). Goal: Create a standardised messaging solution capable of sending results to the right place at the right time Standardised message content - result/reason/comment

Download Presentation

PerkinElmer LAS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PerkinElmer LAS Result Messaging and Demographics March 21st, 2012

  2. Results Messaging (RM) • Goal: • Create a standardised messaging solution capable of sending results to the right place at the right time • Standardised message content - result/reason/comment • Solution with longevity for the NHS • Easier to develop, deploy and update. Ultimately cheaper for all • Expectations: • Roll out across other UK Specimen Gate/Lifecycle sites • Standard template for all companies involved from NSC • Results: • Standardised solution not multiple bespoke solutions. • Standard messages using appropriate SNOMED codes • CAP process was painful and would inhibit some laboratory/CH software suppliers. Needs reducing. • Needs other CH software suppliers CAP approved or we have wasted investment

  3. Demographics National solution to a standard specification – this is what we want • Usable demographic data set • Easy/cheap to deploy and support • Central data feed – not connected to multiple CH departments • Scaleable if laboratories want to increase the geographical area screened. Options discussed • NN4B – tried to do this several years ago with Manchester. We were not allowed access to data set • Connect to CH direct – different formats, different companies added complexity • Direct to spine – similar to Results Messaging, data set limited. • New optiontaking an NN4B feed from Newborn Hearing program

More Related