1 / 15

Phase 2 – site specific investigation Summary of results

Phase 2 – site specific investigation Summary of results. Tonkin & Taylor Ltd 2 July 2012. Summary of investigation. 206 residential properties and 1 ECC 6 residential properties not included in the investigation 544 investigation locations – hand augers Approx 30 sample locations per ha

efia
Download Presentation

Phase 2 – site specific investigation Summary of results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Phase 2 – site specific investigationSummary of results Tonkin & Taylor Ltd 2 July 2012

  2. Summary of investigation • 206 residential properties and 1 ECC • 6 residential properties not included in the investigation • 544 investigation locations – hand augers • Approx 30 sample locations per ha • 1668 soil samples • All samples analysed with the XRF • 409 samples (25%) analysed at the lab

  3. Subsurface materials • East of Tararu Road • Fill placed in late 1800s • Discontinuous layers of silty sand - mullock • Minimal evidence of processed mine tailings or industrial waste • East of Moanataiari Street • Fill placed between 1870s – 1940s • Discontinuous layers of silt, sand and clay - mullock • Minimal evidence of processed mine tailings or industrial waste • West of Moanataiari Street • Fill placed in 1960s • Discontinuous layers of silt, sand and clay - local quarried rock • Minimal evidence of industrial waste

  4. Subsurface materials • Groundwater • Present at 0.8 - 1.2 below ground level • Slightly above sea level • Fill depth • Natural ground encountered at some locations in the east (<1m fill depth) • 0.95 and 1.6m deep in groundwater wells • Cap in eastern area • No visible difference in surface material

  5. Results Summary of laboratory results

  6. Key contaminants • Arsenic • Most concentrations exceed 20 mg/kg • Consistently high in east • Consistently lower in west • Good fit with site history

  7. Key contaminants • Lead • Present in isolated clusters only • Mostly affecting eastern area • Clusters can be linked to site history

  8. Key contaminants • Thallium • Mostly affecting eastern area • Associated with elevated arsenic

  9. Certainty • Heterogeneity of soils • Testing (XRF and laboratory) • Receptor behaviour (now and in the future) • Toxicology (eg bioavailability)

  10. Certainty • Conservative • Ministry for the Environment Guidance • Number of samples • Careful logging of soils • Field and laboratory quality assurance and control • Staged approach

  11. Certainty Laboratory = 1000 mg/kg XRF = 400mg/kg

  12. Certainty Laboratory = 1000 mg/kg XRF = 400 mg/kg Human Health Guideline = 100 mg/kg

  13. Certainty Laboratory = 550 mg/kg XRF = 500 mg/kg

  14. Certainty Laboratory = 550 mg/kg Human Health Guideline = 525 mg/kg XRF = 500 mg/kg

  15. Ground model

More Related