220 likes | 244 Views
Module 3 Finding the Evidence: Pre-appraised Literature. EBM Literature: Reviews. Individual Studies: Experimental. Individual Studies: Observational. Evidence hierarchy. Meta a nalyses Systematic reviews. Randomized control trials (RCTs) Controlled trials w/o randomization.
E N D
EBM Literature: Reviews Individual Studies:Experimental Individual Studies:Observational Evidence hierarchy Meta analyses Systematic reviews Randomized control trials (RCTs) Controlled trials w/o randomization Level of evidence Cohort studies Case control studies/retrospective cohort Case studies/qualitative studies
Review literature Systematic reviews • Address a single clinical question • Locate and validate all trials/studies relevant to the question (inclusion and exclusion criteria) • Should include an explicit literature search • Draw a conclusion, if possible, based on multiple studies Meta-analyses • Systematic reviews taken 1 step further • Look for studies where the data can be combined large study • End product is often displayed in a graphical format (forest plot)
Growth of reviews 15,000 12,500 10,000 7500 # published per year 5000 2500 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
DARE DARE (CRD) commentary for:Gaster B, Holroyd J. St John's Wort for depression: a systematic review. Archives of Internal Medicine 2000; 160(2): 152-156
An example Linde K, et al. 2005. St John's wort for depression: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. British Journal of Psychiatry 186:99-107
Still many interventions not covered by SRs The Cochrane Database is good example of this: approximately 10-15,000 Cochrane reviews are needed to cover interventions that have been investigated in clinical trials. After 18 years <50% have been published (completion is est. ~30 years). Need constant upkeep Half will need to be updated each year Most take 6-12 months to be developed and published Keep in mind