1 / 32

Evidence-based impact of experiential learning

This article explores the evidence-based impact of experiential learning in pharmacy education, including the benefits and challenges faced in implementing this approach. It discusses the need for a competency-based curriculum, partnerships with national health systems, and the importance of integrating pharmaceutical and clinical sciences. The article also highlights the role of experiential learning in improving healthcare outcomes, patient experience, and value for money.

egainer
Download Presentation

Evidence-based impact of experiential learning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evidence-based impact of experiential learning Professor Ian Bates Head of Education Development School of Pharmacy University of London

  2. European Directive • 3000 hours of directed study at 4-5 years’ duration • Greater part of curriculum and not less than 50% of final year must be core • At least 35% on actions and uses of drugs • At least 35% on experiments and data analysis • Research project of 3 – 6 months duration

  3. The professional imperative • Better health care, • Better patient experience, • Better value for money

  4. What’s holding us back? • Curricular pressures • Integration of pharmaceutical and clinical sciences • Dislocation of education and practice • Not competency-based • Performance of our graduates? • Not a partnership • With national health systems • With existing health professionals

  5. Short term vs Long term • Long term • The science of medicines must be foundation of education • Knowledge half-life • Short-term imperatives • Understand and engage with the health agenda

  6. What’s holding us back……curriculum The learning experience Syllabus – knowledge & content Delivery & quality Outcomes Context – institutional, societal & cultural Access, finance & policy

  7. Assessment Goals Independence Good Teaching The Learning Experience… Pharmacy students N = 5,243 p<0.0001 Standardised mean scores

  8. The learning experience • It varies • Is this acceptable? • How can we improve it?

  9. the Knowledge problem …pharmacy syllabus is overcrowded chemistry pharmacology biotechnology genetics medicine analysis formulation physical chemistry ethics pharmacognosy phytochemistry drug design immunology pharmacokinetics therapeutics pathology epidemiology health economics chemical analysis physiology proteomics statistics law Licensing&marketing ADRs microbiology medicinal chemistry biochemistry toxicology drug metabolism genomics social & behavioural sciences

  10. And so…? • Methods • PBL • Near to patient cases • Clinical contact • Experiential • Subject Integration • Designs • Scientists as practitioners • Adult learning & self-direction • Pragmatic & meaningful in situ LLL

  11. “Experiential” learning • Experience • We all have ‘experiences’ • We often learn from an “experience” • Working or work-like • As children…. • Anecdotal…. • No real mysterious or obscure theory

  12. The real issue… …getting the “experience” to UG and PG learners (either students or practitioners) • Design • Environment • Outcomes

  13. …outcomes Competency → Competence → Performance Fit to practise?

  14. performance assessment in vivo performance assessment in vitro clinical context assessment factual assessment Miller’s pyramid From UG to post-registration development Does Shows how Knows how Knows

  15. Experiential learning • Should attempt to bring relevant experience to theory • Should therefore illustrate knowledge (working knowledge?) • Should therefore re-enforce primary learning …it should move learning towards the competency agenda…

  16. Graduation One year later Pharm Care Competencies(OSCE) 70% 60% 60% 50% 40% 30% 30% 20% 10% 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 2001/02 McRobbie et al

  17. Behaviours Values attitudes Competency Knowledge Skills “Competence” is a complex educational construct… ...with new currency value

  18. An example.. Drug-drug interactions:- • Theory, knowledge • Examples (from lectures, books, case studies, etc) • Exams and questions

  19. Moving from “knowing” (theory)… towards …“doing” (performance)

  20. performance assessment in vivo performance assessment in vitro clinical context assessment factual assessment Miller’s pyramid From UG to post-registration development Does Shows how Knows how Knows

  21. Barriers • Assessment • Resource • Culture

  22. performance assessment in vivo performance assessment in vitro clinical context assessment factual assessment Miller’s pyramid From UG to post-registration development Does Shows how Knows how Knows

  23. Barriers • Assessment • Resource • Culture …there must be a working relationship with the university and the work environment

  24. School Pharmacy Univ Brighton Univ East Anglia Univ Portsmouth Medway School King’s London Univ Reading Kingston Univ NHS Joint Programme Board (JPB)Generalist Training (3 years)www.postgraduatepharmacy.org • Government funding = committment • PG Diploma in General Pharmacy Practice -Core - MI, Technical, Patient & Clinical Services • Common Validation by HEIs in collaborative • Currently 300 practitioner-students (target 2009 = 750)

  25. FDL, e-modes off-site, experiential Independent Career driven Higher Post-reg UG/Pre UG Learning modality with time/career pathway Predominantly FDL and e-modes Predominantly face-to-face modes Cohort learners Lone learner On-site (HEI) learning Off-site (work) learning

  26. General and Higher level practice: Growing the next generation The next [urgent] challenge… • Competency frameworks for undergraduate education • Assessment of performance at UG level (medicines-centered)

  27. The pharmaceutical imperative • Bring our pharmaceutical science into healthcare practice

  28. Where is our professional ‘centre of gravity’? Patient-focussed, medicines-centred ..can only achieve this through a partnership of universities and health care employers (systems)

  29. Key performance indicators F1(medical) Low Activity High Activity W ê ê ê 200 ê W ê ê ê ê 150 W ê W ê ê ê W ê W Pharmacy establishment WTEs 100 ê W ê W W W ê W W W W W ê W ê 50 W W W ê W W W W W W ê W W ê ê ê 0 ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê 70 80 90 100 110 120 W W R-Square = 0.16 W W W W R-Square = 0.76 Mortality rate Index

  30. Evidence-based impact of experiential learning Professor Ian Bates Head of Education Development School of Pharmacy University of London

More Related